Study Investigates Seismic Monitoring for Carbon Storage Leak Detection

C. Carpenter
{"title":"Study Investigates Seismic Monitoring for Carbon Storage Leak Detection","authors":"C. Carpenter","doi":"10.2118/0224-0086-jpt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper IPTC 22980, “Carbon Storage Leak Detection Through Seismic FWI and RTM: Different Survey Analyses,” by Sajjad Amani, Kyoto University. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2023 International Petroleum Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission.\n \n \n \n In the complete paper, marine seismic data processing is investigated as a tool for monitoring possible leakages in geological carbon storage. Because of the great importance of storage permanence, a precise leakage-monitoring strategy is crucial. The proficiency of seismic monitoring solutions for leakage monitoring can be affected by shallower layers as a result of structure, seismic wave attenuation, and leak size. The authors explore two popular seismic monitoring methods used in this application in different scenarios: full waveform inversion (FWI) and reverse-time migration (RTM).\n \n \n \n Among the various carbon capture and storage (CCS) options, underground storage in saline aquifers is the best-understood solution. To assure storage consistency and permanence, finding the best strategy to precisely detect possible carbon leaks is essential. A perfect method must demonstrate the difference between stored CO2 and injected CO2 to detect potential fast- and slow-leakage areas. The seismic monitoring technique is the most efficient approach in this respect.\n Two popular tools for seismic monitoring are FWI and RTM. Several studies of their use in this application have been conducted. However, previous research did not analyze different survey arrays for carbon-leak detection using FWI and RTM. The current research aims to investigate quantitative aspects of CCS monitoring to conduct sensitivity analysis of the three different survey arrays [vertical seismic profile (VSP), crosswell, and surface] for different amounts of CO2-storage leakage in a saline aquifer reservoir. The capability of seismic-imaging methods for small amounts of leakage was tested. Comparison of these three arrays using monitoring methods such as RTM and FWI reveals their pros and cons in providing detailed information about the reservoir.\n In this research, a simple synthetic model was built that closely fits actual reservoirs characterized by suitable physical features such as velocity and density. Subsequently, elastic wave propagation simulation was implemented by use of a finite-difference scheme over a physical model of the reservoir. Then, FWI was applied to enhance the accuracy of the model parameters. With an efficient forward-modeling and inversion scheme, RTM was used as a powerful imaging tool that provides final high-resolution results for monitoring CO2 migration and possible leakage. This process examined the synthetic model for different amounts of CO2 leakage in saline aquifers to evaluate the performance of CO2 leakage monitoring using the seismic method. The results of the different receiver and source arrays also were compared to establish their effectiveness.\n","PeriodicalId":16720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","volume":"47 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/0224-0086-jpt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper IPTC 22980, “Carbon Storage Leak Detection Through Seismic FWI and RTM: Different Survey Analyses,” by Sajjad Amani, Kyoto University. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2023 International Petroleum Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission. In the complete paper, marine seismic data processing is investigated as a tool for monitoring possible leakages in geological carbon storage. Because of the great importance of storage permanence, a precise leakage-monitoring strategy is crucial. The proficiency of seismic monitoring solutions for leakage monitoring can be affected by shallower layers as a result of structure, seismic wave attenuation, and leak size. The authors explore two popular seismic monitoring methods used in this application in different scenarios: full waveform inversion (FWI) and reverse-time migration (RTM). Among the various carbon capture and storage (CCS) options, underground storage in saline aquifers is the best-understood solution. To assure storage consistency and permanence, finding the best strategy to precisely detect possible carbon leaks is essential. A perfect method must demonstrate the difference between stored CO2 and injected CO2 to detect potential fast- and slow-leakage areas. The seismic monitoring technique is the most efficient approach in this respect. Two popular tools for seismic monitoring are FWI and RTM. Several studies of their use in this application have been conducted. However, previous research did not analyze different survey arrays for carbon-leak detection using FWI and RTM. The current research aims to investigate quantitative aspects of CCS monitoring to conduct sensitivity analysis of the three different survey arrays [vertical seismic profile (VSP), crosswell, and surface] for different amounts of CO2-storage leakage in a saline aquifer reservoir. The capability of seismic-imaging methods for small amounts of leakage was tested. Comparison of these three arrays using monitoring methods such as RTM and FWI reveals their pros and cons in providing detailed information about the reservoir. In this research, a simple synthetic model was built that closely fits actual reservoirs characterized by suitable physical features such as velocity and density. Subsequently, elastic wave propagation simulation was implemented by use of a finite-difference scheme over a physical model of the reservoir. Then, FWI was applied to enhance the accuracy of the model parameters. With an efficient forward-modeling and inversion scheme, RTM was used as a powerful imaging tool that provides final high-resolution results for monitoring CO2 migration and possible leakage. This process examined the synthetic model for different amounts of CO2 leakage in saline aquifers to evaluate the performance of CO2 leakage monitoring using the seismic method. The results of the different receiver and source arrays also were compared to establish their effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳储存泄漏检测地震监测研究
本文由 JPT 技术编辑 Chris Carpenter 撰写,收录了京都大学 Sajjad Amani 发表的 IPTC 22980 号论文 "通过地震 FWI 和 RTM 进行碳储存泄漏检测:不同的勘测分析 "的要点。该论文未经同行评审。版权归 2023 年国际石油技术大会所有。经许可转载。 在这篇完整的论文中,研究了海洋地震数据处理作为监测地质碳封存中可能出现的泄漏的工具。由于封存永久性的重要性,精确的泄漏监测策略至关重要。由于结构、地震波衰减和泄漏大小等原因,较浅的地层可能会影响地震监测解决方案对泄漏监测的熟练程度。作者探讨了两种常用的地震监测方法:全波形反演 (FWI) 和反向时间迁移 (RTM)。 在各种碳捕集与封存(CCS)方案中,在含盐含水层中进行地下封存是最容易理解的解决方案。为了确保封存的一致性和永久性,找到精确检测可能的碳泄漏的最佳策略至关重要。一种完美的方法必须能够显示出封存的二氧化碳与注入的二氧化碳之间的差异,从而检测出潜在的快速和缓慢泄漏区域。在这方面,地震监测技术是最有效的方法。两种常用的地震监测工具是 FWI 和 RTM。关于这两种工具在这一应用中的使用,已经进行了多项研究。然而,以往的研究并未对使用 FWI 和 RTM 进行漏碳检测的不同勘测阵列进行分析。目前的研究旨在对 CCS 监测的定量方面进行研究,针对盐碱含水层储层中不同数量的 CO2 储存泄漏,对三种不同的勘测阵列(垂直地震剖面 (VSP)、交叉井和地表)进行敏感性分析。测试了地震成像方法处理少量泄漏的能力。通过使用 RTM 和 FWI 等监测方法对这三种阵列进行比较,可以发现它们在提供储层详细信息方面的优缺点。在这项研究中,建立了一个简单的合成模型,该模型非常符合实际储层的特点,具有适当的物理特征,如速度和密度。随后,在储层物理模型上使用有限差分方案进行了弹性波传播模拟。然后,应用 FWI 来提高模型参数的精度。通过高效的正演建模和反演方案,RTM 被用作一种强大的成像工具,为监测二氧化碳迁移和可能的泄漏提供最终的高分辨率结果。这一过程针对盐类含水层中不同数量的二氧化碳泄漏对合成模型进行了检验,以评估使用地震方法监测二氧化碳泄漏的性能。还对不同接收器和震源阵列的结果进行了比较,以确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended Laterals and Hydraulic Fracturing Redevelop Tight Fractured Carbonates Proposed Methods Accelerate Permanent CO2-Storage Process 2024 SPE Pioneers of Improved Oil Recovery What You Don’t Know About Chevron’s New 20K Anchor Project Downhole Hydrogen-Generation System Stimulates Challenging Formations in Kuwait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1