The comparative analysis of the Ex and Hz fields sensitivity generated by electric dipole sources

IF 1.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geophysics and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jge/gxae018
XianXiang Wang, Jiaqi Li, Songda Lei
{"title":"The comparative analysis of the Ex and Hz fields sensitivity generated by electric dipole sources","authors":"XianXiang Wang, Jiaqi Li, Songda Lei","doi":"10.1093/jge/gxae018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the CSAMT method, orthogonal electric and magnetic fields are commonly measured to determine the Cagniard apparent resistivity. However, in the near-field zone, the Cagniard resistivity is severely distorted, which is unrelated to underground structures. The Ex and Hz amplitudes in a homogeneous half-space monotonically vary in resistivity, and a numerical algorithm could achieve high-precision apparent resistivity without distortion for all frequencies. On this basis, the main focus of this investigation is on the comparative analysis of the sensitivity for the Ex field, Hz field, and Cagniard apparent resistivity to conductive and resistivity targets via synthetic models. The achieved results confirm that the Ex field could exhibit a more enhanced sensitivity for the resistive objects, while the Hz field could more effectively identify the conductive target. Besides, the static effect often distorts the electromagnetic data, which rigorously influences their application. The influence of the static effect on both the Ex and Hz fields is also examined in detail. The apparent resistivity based on the Ex field and Cagniard apparent resistivity is significantly affected by the static effect, which can mask deep anomalous blocks. However, the apparent resistivity based on the Hz field is almost unaffected by the static effect. Finally, a more efficient observation approach is provided for both the insulating and conductive targets.","PeriodicalId":54820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the CSAMT method, orthogonal electric and magnetic fields are commonly measured to determine the Cagniard apparent resistivity. However, in the near-field zone, the Cagniard resistivity is severely distorted, which is unrelated to underground structures. The Ex and Hz amplitudes in a homogeneous half-space monotonically vary in resistivity, and a numerical algorithm could achieve high-precision apparent resistivity without distortion for all frequencies. On this basis, the main focus of this investigation is on the comparative analysis of the sensitivity for the Ex field, Hz field, and Cagniard apparent resistivity to conductive and resistivity targets via synthetic models. The achieved results confirm that the Ex field could exhibit a more enhanced sensitivity for the resistive objects, while the Hz field could more effectively identify the conductive target. Besides, the static effect often distorts the electromagnetic data, which rigorously influences their application. The influence of the static effect on both the Ex and Hz fields is also examined in detail. The apparent resistivity based on the Ex field and Cagniard apparent resistivity is significantly affected by the static effect, which can mask deep anomalous blocks. However, the apparent resistivity based on the Hz field is almost unaffected by the static effect. Finally, a more efficient observation approach is provided for both the insulating and conductive targets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电偶极源产生的 Ex 和 Hz 场灵敏度的比较分析
在 CSAMT 方法中,通常通过测量正交电场和磁场来确定 Cagniard 视电阻率。然而,在近场区内,Cagniard 表观电阻率严重失真,这与地下结构无关。均质半空间中的 Ex 和 Hz 振幅在电阻率上呈单调变化,数值算法可实现高精度视电阻率,且所有频率都不会失真。在此基础上,本次研究的重点是通过合成模型比较分析 Ex 场、Hz 场和 Cagniard 视电阻率对导电目标和电阻率目标的敏感性。研究结果证实,Ex 场对电阻目标的灵敏度更高,而 Hz 场则能更有效地识别导电目标。此外,静态效应通常会扭曲电磁数据,这严重影响了电磁数据的应用。本文还详细研究了静态效应对 Ex 和 Hz 场的影响。基于 Ex 场和 Cagniard 表观电阻率的表观电阻率受到静电效应的严重影响,会掩盖深部异常块。然而,基于 Hz 场的视电阻率几乎不受静电效应的影响。最后,为绝缘和导电目标提供了一种更有效的观测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
87
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering aims to promote research and developments in geophysics and related areas of engineering. It has a predominantly applied science and engineering focus, but solicits and accepts high-quality contributions in all earth-physics disciplines, including geodynamics, natural and controlled-source seismology, oil, gas and mineral exploration, petrophysics and reservoir geophysics. The journal covers those aspects of engineering that are closely related to geophysics, or on the targets and problems that geophysics addresses. Typically, this is engineering focused on the subsurface, particularly petroleum engineering, rock mechanics, geophysical software engineering, drilling technology, remote sensing, instrumentation and sensor design.
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulations of the acoustic and electrical properties of digital rocks based on tetrahedral unstructured mesh Simulation study on the radioactive logging responses in the spiral borehole Kirchhoff Prestack time migration of crooked-line seismic data 2-D acoustic equation prestack reverse-time migration based on optimized combined compact difference scheme Bayesian linearized inversion for petrophysical and pore-connectivity parameters with seismic elastic data of carbonate reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1