How is The Theory of Law Possible? The Subject Area of Legal Theory in A. Reinach's Phenomenological Project

Yi Liu
{"title":"How is The Theory of Law Possible? The Subject Area of Legal Theory in A. Reinach's Phenomenological Project","authors":"Yi Liu","doi":"10.7256/2454-0706.2024.2.69788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article discusses Adolf Reinach's legal doctrine project, as presented in his main work 'The Apriori Foundations of Civil Law'. The author explores the subject matter of Reinach's theoretical discipline of law and the apodictic necessity of apriori laws rooted in the essence of legal concepts. The analysis focuses on the nature of apriori laws that are based on the essence of the legal concept and the correlative relation between apriori laws and their corresponding essence. The legal doctrine of Reinach is examined with special attention to its philosophical and methodological consistency, which is conditioned by the phenomenological method during the period of the Munich-Göttingen community. The author examines the differences between the first project of eidetic-phenomenological philosophy of law and the philosophy of positive law. This article demonstrates how the phenomenological theory of cognition, specifically the theory of science, was incorporated into A. Reinach's apriori doctrine of law. To reveal the problem, it is necessary to establish connections between A. Reinach's 'Apriori Foundations of Civil Law' and Edmund Husserl's 'Logical Investigations'. The article concludes that the concept of the apriori doctrine of law represents the realization of Husserl's theory of science as outlined in the 'Logical Investigations'. The article concludes that A. Reinach defined the subject area of the theory of law by attributing it to the intensional being, relying on E. Husserl's understanding of science. It is argued that the oneness of this subject area of legal theory lies in the intensional (essence-correlative) correlation of the essence of legal concepts and their apriori laws. This study's novelty lies in revealing the epistemological aspects of Reinach's eidetic-phenomenological project, which hold methodological value for phenomenological theory of law.\n","PeriodicalId":503816,"journal":{"name":"Право и политика","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Право и политика","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2024.2.69788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses Adolf Reinach's legal doctrine project, as presented in his main work 'The Apriori Foundations of Civil Law'. The author explores the subject matter of Reinach's theoretical discipline of law and the apodictic necessity of apriori laws rooted in the essence of legal concepts. The analysis focuses on the nature of apriori laws that are based on the essence of the legal concept and the correlative relation between apriori laws and their corresponding essence. The legal doctrine of Reinach is examined with special attention to its philosophical and methodological consistency, which is conditioned by the phenomenological method during the period of the Munich-Göttingen community. The author examines the differences between the first project of eidetic-phenomenological philosophy of law and the philosophy of positive law. This article demonstrates how the phenomenological theory of cognition, specifically the theory of science, was incorporated into A. Reinach's apriori doctrine of law. To reveal the problem, it is necessary to establish connections between A. Reinach's 'Apriori Foundations of Civil Law' and Edmund Husserl's 'Logical Investigations'. The article concludes that the concept of the apriori doctrine of law represents the realization of Husserl's theory of science as outlined in the 'Logical Investigations'. The article concludes that A. Reinach defined the subject area of the theory of law by attributing it to the intensional being, relying on E. Husserl's understanding of science. It is argued that the oneness of this subject area of legal theory lies in the intensional (essence-correlative) correlation of the essence of legal concepts and their apriori laws. This study's novelty lies in revealing the epistemological aspects of Reinach's eidetic-phenomenological project, which hold methodological value for phenomenological theory of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律理论如何可能?莱纳赫现象学项目中的法律理论主题领域
文章讨论了阿道夫-莱纳赫在其主要著作《民法的先验基础》中提出的法律学说计划。作者探讨了莱纳赫法学理论学科的主题,以及根植于法律概念本质的先验法的先验必要性。分析的重点是基于法律概念本质的先验法的性质,以及先验法与其相应本质之间的关联关系。在研究莱纳赫的法律学说时,作者特别关注其在哲学和方法论上的一致性,这种一致性受到慕尼黑-哥廷根学派时期现象学方法的制约。作者探讨了 "爱的现象学 "法哲学的第一个项目与实在法哲学之间的差异。本文论证了关于认知的现象学理论,特别是科学理论,是如何被纳入 A. Reinach 的先验法学说的。为了揭示这一问题,有必要在 A. Reinach 的 "民法先验基础 "与 Edmund Husserl 的 "逻辑研究 "之间建立联系。文章的结论是,法律先验学说的概念代表了胡塞尔在《逻辑研究》中所概述的科学理论的实现。文章的结论是,A. Reinach 根据 E. Husserl 对科学的理解,将法律学说的主题领域归结为内在存在,从而界定了法律学说的主题领域。文章认为,法律理论这一主题领域的一体性在于法律概念的本质与其先验规律之间的内维(本质-相关性)关联。本研究的新颖之处在于揭示了莱纳赫的 "表象项目"(eidetic-phenomenological project)的认识论方面,这对现象学法学理论具有方法论价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shares owned by a limited liability company : grounds and consequences State responsibility for the massive violation of rights and freedoms : a comparative analysis of the experience of the United States of America and the Russian Federation Formation of a state approach to the accumulation of human potential through the prism of the importance of education The social state in Russia and Belarus as a complex constitutional principle On the possibility of compensation for moral damage in case of violation of property rights: traditional views and innovations of practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1