Prioritising infant mental health: a qualitative study examining the role of education and training to infant mental health service development in Scotland

Fionnghuala Murphy, Fifi T H Phang, Alicia Weaver, Helen Minnis, Anne McFadyen, Andrew Dawson
{"title":"Prioritising infant mental health: a qualitative study examining the role of education and training to infant mental health service development in Scotland","authors":"Fionnghuala Murphy, Fifi T H Phang, Alicia Weaver, Helen Minnis, Anne McFadyen, Andrew Dawson","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-02-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDespite the long-established importance of infant mental health, internationally this has not been mirrored in the provision of infant mental health services. Within Scotland in the UK, there has been significant recent government investment in developing infant mental health services. However, existing research identifies a massive knowledge and skills gap that could create barriers to implementation. This study aims to use qualitative methods to consider the views of relevant professional stakeholders on education and training within infant mental health.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors completed semi-structured interviews with 14 professional stakeholders working in a health board in Scotland. This study used purposive sampling to include a broad range of professionals across health and social care services and analysed the resulting data using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) methodology. This study adopted a reflexive stance throughout, including the research team interviewing each other as part of the process.\n\n\nFindings\nWithin the theme of education and training, we identified four sub-themes. These included roles for public health and societal education, training for parents, training for professionals and increasing professionals’ experience of infant mental health.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe issues identified are relevant in any area of the UK or internationally in considering the role of education and training in developing and maintaining new infant mental health services. Further research with families and with wider groups of professional stakeholders would be of further benefit.\n","PeriodicalId":517075,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-02-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Despite the long-established importance of infant mental health, internationally this has not been mirrored in the provision of infant mental health services. Within Scotland in the UK, there has been significant recent government investment in developing infant mental health services. However, existing research identifies a massive knowledge and skills gap that could create barriers to implementation. This study aims to use qualitative methods to consider the views of relevant professional stakeholders on education and training within infant mental health. Design/methodology/approach The authors completed semi-structured interviews with 14 professional stakeholders working in a health board in Scotland. This study used purposive sampling to include a broad range of professionals across health and social care services and analysed the resulting data using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) methodology. This study adopted a reflexive stance throughout, including the research team interviewing each other as part of the process. Findings Within the theme of education and training, we identified four sub-themes. These included roles for public health and societal education, training for parents, training for professionals and increasing professionals’ experience of infant mental health. Originality/value The issues identified are relevant in any area of the UK or internationally in considering the role of education and training in developing and maintaining new infant mental health services. Further research with families and with wider groups of professional stakeholders would be of further benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优先考虑婴儿心理健康:一项定性研究,探讨教育和培训对苏格兰婴儿心理健康服务发展的作用
目的尽管婴儿心理健康的重要性由来已久,但在国际上,婴儿心理健康服务的提供情况却不尽相同。在英国苏格兰,政府最近在发展婴儿心理健康服务方面投入了大量资金。然而,现有的研究发现,在知识和技能方面存在着巨大的差距,这可能会对服务的实施造成障碍。本研究旨在使用定性方法来考虑相关专业利益相关者对婴儿心理健康教育和培训的看法。作者对在苏格兰卫生委员会工作的 14 名专业利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。本研究采用了有目的的抽样方法,涵盖了医疗和社会护理服务领域的各类专业人员,并使用 Braun 和 Clarke(2006 年)的方法对所得数据进行了分析。本研究自始至终都采取了反思的态度,包括研究小组在研究过程中相互访谈。研究结果在教育和培训这一主题下,我们确定了四个次主题。原创性/价值在考虑教育和培训在发展和维持新的婴儿心理健康服务中的作用时,所发现的问题与英国或国际上的任何地区都相关。与家庭和更广泛的专业利益相关者群体开展进一步的研究将大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“When I started teaching you wouldn’t notice any of that’: teachers’ perceptions of the issues facing children and adolescents’ mental health and well-being” Effect of smartphone addiction on mental health and sleep quality among undergraduate pharmacy students in a Nigerian public university The impact of sensory modulation in acute mental health units: an organisational case study analysis Experiences of pre-registration student nurses during mental health clinical placements that enhance practice learning: an integrative literature review Participation and satisfaction with thee-learning course “Mental health promotion in school health care”: a mixed-method study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1