Associations between illness perceptions, word recognition, and perceived sound quality in cochlear implant users.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2313027
Effi Katharina Lehmann, Cynthia Glaubitz, Katharina Heinze-Köhler, Tim Liebscher, Ulrich Hoppe
{"title":"Associations between illness perceptions, word recognition, and perceived sound quality in cochlear implant users.","authors":"Effi Katharina Lehmann, Cynthia Glaubitz, Katharina Heinze-Köhler, Tim Liebscher, Ulrich Hoppe","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2313027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Illness perceptions refer to thoughts and ideas an individual has about an illness. The aim was to understand how cochlear implant (CI) users' illness perceptions, in addition to their monosyllabic word recognition abilities, are associated with their self-perceived sound quality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were collected during routine CI check-up appointments. Participants completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (assessing their illness perceptions) and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (assessing their subjective sound quality). Additionally, monosyllabic word recognition abilities were measured with the Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test. Hierarchical regression analysis were utilised to model users' sound quality ratings. Participants' age was entered first as a control variable. In the next step, monosyllabic word recognition was entered. Finally, participants' illness perceptions were entered.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Fifty-five participants with unilateral CI provision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monosyllabic word recognition was significant in the second step. When illness perceptions and monosyllabic word recognition were both included in the third step, illness perceptions, but not monosyllabic word recognition, were significant. The model explained 22% of the variance of subjective sound quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monosyllabic word recognition abilities and illness perceptions of CI users are important for their self-reported sound quality, but illness perceptions appear to be potentially more relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2313027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Illness perceptions refer to thoughts and ideas an individual has about an illness. The aim was to understand how cochlear implant (CI) users' illness perceptions, in addition to their monosyllabic word recognition abilities, are associated with their self-perceived sound quality.

Design: Data were collected during routine CI check-up appointments. Participants completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (assessing their illness perceptions) and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (assessing their subjective sound quality). Additionally, monosyllabic word recognition abilities were measured with the Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test. Hierarchical regression analysis were utilised to model users' sound quality ratings. Participants' age was entered first as a control variable. In the next step, monosyllabic word recognition was entered. Finally, participants' illness perceptions were entered.

Study sample: Fifty-five participants with unilateral CI provision.

Results: Monosyllabic word recognition was significant in the second step. When illness perceptions and monosyllabic word recognition were both included in the third step, illness perceptions, but not monosyllabic word recognition, were significant. The model explained 22% of the variance of subjective sound quality.

Conclusions: Monosyllabic word recognition abilities and illness perceptions of CI users are important for their self-reported sound quality, but illness perceptions appear to be potentially more relevant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工耳蜗使用者的疾病感知、单词识别和感知音质之间的关联。
目的:疾病感知是指个人对疾病的想法和观念。本研究旨在了解人工耳蜗(CI)使用者对疾病的认知,以及他们的单音节词识别能力,是如何与他们自我感觉的声音质量相关联的:设计:在常规 CI 检查中收集数据。设计:数据是在常规人工耳蜗检查时收集的,受试者填写了简短疾病感知问卷(评估他们的疾病感知)和听力植入音质指数(评估他们的主观音质)。此外,还通过弗莱堡单音节词测试测量了单音节词识别能力。使用层次回归分析法对用户的音质评分进行建模。首先输入受试者的年龄作为控制变量。然后输入单音节词识别率。最后,输入参与者对疾病的看法:研究样本:55 名提供单侧 CI 的参与者:结果:在第二步中,单音节词识别率显著。当疾病认知和单音节词识别都被纳入第三步时,疾病认知(而非单音节词识别)具有显著性。该模型解释了主观音质变异的 22%:结论:CI 使用者的单音节词识别能力和疾病感知对其自我报告的声音质量很重要,但疾病感知似乎与之更为相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
What factors do health professionals view as influencing the success of otitis media detection programs for First Nations children? A scoping review and synthesis of qualitative research. Effect of pre-school sound exposure on children's hearing function: results from preparatory studies assessing hearing function by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hearing aid wear time and its impact on vocabulary in preschoolers with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Effect of reducing electrical stimulation rate on hearing performance of Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients. What's in a name? A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-medical amplification devices in adults with mild and moderate hearing losses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1