Development of a novel five dye insertion/deletion (INDEL) panel for ancestry determination.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00414-024-03196-1
Lucio L Avellaneda, Damani T Johnson, Ryan M Gutierrez, Lindsey Thompson, Sarah A Sturm, Kelly A Sage, Rachel M Houston, Bobby L LaRue
{"title":"Development of a novel five dye insertion/deletion (INDEL) panel for ancestry determination.","authors":"Lucio L Avellaneda, Damani T Johnson, Ryan M Gutierrez, Lindsey Thompson, Sarah A Sturm, Kelly A Sage, Rachel M Houston, Bobby L LaRue","doi":"10.1007/s00414-024-03196-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of genetic markers, specifically Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), has been a valuable tool for identifying persons of interest. However, the ability to analyze additional markers including Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertion/Deletion (INDELs) polymorphisms allows laboratories to explore other investigative leads. INDELs were chosen in this study because large panels can be differentiated by size, allowing them to be genotyped by capillary electrophoresis. Moreover, these markers do not produce stutter and are smaller in size than STRs, facilitating the recovery of genetic information from degraded samples. The INDEL Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs) in this study were selected from the 1000 Genomes Project based on a fixation index (F<sub>ST</sub>) greater than 0.50, high allele frequency divergence, and genetic distance. A total of 25 INDEL-AIMs were optimized and validated according to SWGDAM guidelines in a five-dye multiplex. To validate the panel, genotyping was performed on 155 unrelated individuals from four ancestral groups (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, and East Asian). Bayesian clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed revealing clear separation among three groups, with some observed overlap within the Hispanic group. Additionally, the PCA results were compared against a training set of 793 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project, demonstrating consistent results. Validation studies showed the assay to be reproducible, tolerant to common inhibitors, robust with challenging casework type samples, and sensitive down to 125 pg. In conclusion, our results demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of a 25 loci INDEL system for ancestry inference of four ancestries commonly found in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03196-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of genetic markers, specifically Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), has been a valuable tool for identifying persons of interest. However, the ability to analyze additional markers including Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertion/Deletion (INDELs) polymorphisms allows laboratories to explore other investigative leads. INDELs were chosen in this study because large panels can be differentiated by size, allowing them to be genotyped by capillary electrophoresis. Moreover, these markers do not produce stutter and are smaller in size than STRs, facilitating the recovery of genetic information from degraded samples. The INDEL Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs) in this study were selected from the 1000 Genomes Project based on a fixation index (FST) greater than 0.50, high allele frequency divergence, and genetic distance. A total of 25 INDEL-AIMs were optimized and validated according to SWGDAM guidelines in a five-dye multiplex. To validate the panel, genotyping was performed on 155 unrelated individuals from four ancestral groups (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, and East Asian). Bayesian clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed revealing clear separation among three groups, with some observed overlap within the Hispanic group. Additionally, the PCA results were compared against a training set of 793 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project, demonstrating consistent results. Validation studies showed the assay to be reproducible, tolerant to common inhibitors, robust with challenging casework type samples, and sensitive down to 125 pg. In conclusion, our results demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of a 25 loci INDEL system for ancestry inference of four ancestries commonly found in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发用于确定祖先的新型五染插入/缺失(INDEL)面板。
使用遗传标记,特别是短串联重复序列(STR),一直是识别相关人员的重要工具。不过,由于可以分析包括单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 和插入/缺失 (INDEL) 多态性在内的其他标记,实验室可以探索其他调查线索。本研究之所以选择 INDELs,是因为大样本可以通过大小进行区分,从而可以通过毛细管电泳进行基因分型。此外,与 STR 相比,这些标记物不会产生口吃现象,而且尺寸较小,有利于从退化样本中恢复遗传信息。本研究中的 INDEL 祖先信息标记(AIMs)是根据固定指数(FST)大于 0.50、高等位基因频率差异和遗传距离从 1000 基因组计划中筛选出来的。根据 SWGDAM 指南,在五染多重分析中优化并验证了总共 25 个 INDEL-AIMs。为了验证该面板,对来自四个祖先群体(白种人、非洲人、西班牙裔人和东亚人)的 155 个无亲属关系的个体进行了基因分型。贝叶斯聚类和主成分分析(PCA)显示,三个群体之间有明显的分离,在西班牙裔群体中也观察到一些重叠。此外,还将 PCA 结果与来自 1000 基因组计划的 793 个样本的训练集进行了比较,结果一致。验证研究表明,该检测方法具有可重复性、对常见抑制剂的耐受性、对具有挑战性的个案类型样本的稳健性以及低至 125 pg 的灵敏度。总之,我们的研究结果证明了 25 个位点 INDEL 系统在推断美国常见的四个血统方面的稳健性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
期刊最新文献
A probability model for estimating age in young individuals relative to key legal thresholds: 15, 18 or 21-year Age estimation from median palatine suture using computed tomography reconstructed 3D images: a comparison of Northern and Southwestern Chinese populations A 10-year retrospective analysis of sudden unexpected death in the young investigated at Salt River Mortuary, Cape Town Mood disorders and suicide: pilot study on postmortem toxicologic evidence and adherence to psychiatric therapy by determining blood levels of medications Age estimation of burnt human remains through DNA methylation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1