Genetic Testing Experiences of People Living with Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Results of a Global Survey.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1159/000537818
Nabin Paudel, Avril Daly, Fiona Waters, Petia Stratieva
{"title":"Genetic Testing Experiences of People Living with Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Results of a Global Survey.","authors":"Nabin Paudel, Avril Daly, Fiona Waters, Petia Stratieva","doi":"10.1159/000537818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obtaining a genetic diagnosis via genetic testing (GT) is a fundamental step in determining the eligibility of a patient to be enrolled in emerging clinical trials and research studies. Besides, the knowledge of genetic outcome allows patients to plan for significant life choices. However, critical barriers exist to an equitable access to genetic services globally. The objective of this study was to explore patient experiences while seeking genomic services for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was designed based on a focus group conducted by Retina International and including people affected by IRDs and their families living in different regions around the world. The survey was then circulated to 43 Retina International member organisations globally via email newsletters and social networks. The survey involved questions in relation to the accessibility, affordability, and timeliness of genomic services for IRDs as well as patient perceived awareness of genomic services for IRDs among healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 410 respondents (IRD patients and caregivers) from over 30 countries across all continents responded to the survey. A considerable number of the patients had to go through a long and arduous journey to access GT and counselling services, wherein 40% had to visit more than 5 physicians, 27% had to visit more than 5 clinics, and 57% had to wait for more than 3 years before obtaining a genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, 46% of respondents reported not receiving genetic counselling prior to undergoing GT, and 39% reported not receiving genetic counselling after undergoing GT. Over 3/4th of the participants reported that they did not have to pay for their genomic services for IRDs. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents reported that their eye care professionals (ECPs) were either not aware of GT, remained neutral, or did not encourage them to undergo GT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with IRDs do not have equitable access to best practice GT and counselling services. Greater awareness and training regarding IRDs and the benefits of GT and genetic counselling for patients and families are needed among ECPs. A best practice model on access to genomic services for IRDs is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obtaining a genetic diagnosis via genetic testing (GT) is a fundamental step in determining the eligibility of a patient to be enrolled in emerging clinical trials and research studies. Besides, the knowledge of genetic outcome allows patients to plan for significant life choices. However, critical barriers exist to an equitable access to genetic services globally. The objective of this study was to explore patient experiences while seeking genomic services for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs).

Methods: An online survey was designed based on a focus group conducted by Retina International and including people affected by IRDs and their families living in different regions around the world. The survey was then circulated to 43 Retina International member organisations globally via email newsletters and social networks. The survey involved questions in relation to the accessibility, affordability, and timeliness of genomic services for IRDs as well as patient perceived awareness of genomic services for IRDs among healthcare professionals.

Results: A total of 410 respondents (IRD patients and caregivers) from over 30 countries across all continents responded to the survey. A considerable number of the patients had to go through a long and arduous journey to access GT and counselling services, wherein 40% had to visit more than 5 physicians, 27% had to visit more than 5 clinics, and 57% had to wait for more than 3 years before obtaining a genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, 46% of respondents reported not receiving genetic counselling prior to undergoing GT, and 39% reported not receiving genetic counselling after undergoing GT. Over 3/4th of the participants reported that they did not have to pay for their genomic services for IRDs. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents reported that their eye care professionals (ECPs) were either not aware of GT, remained neutral, or did not encourage them to undergo GT.

Conclusion: Patients with IRDs do not have equitable access to best practice GT and counselling services. Greater awareness and training regarding IRDs and the benefits of GT and genetic counselling for patients and families are needed among ECPs. A best practice model on access to genomic services for IRDs is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传性视网膜变性(IRDs)患者的基因检测经历--全球调查结果。
导言:通过基因检测获得基因诊断是决定患者是否有资格参加新兴临床试验和研究的基本步骤。此外,对遗传结果的了解还能让患者计划重大的人生选择。然而,在全球范围内,公平获得遗传服务还存在严重障碍。本研究旨在探讨患者在寻求 IRDs 基因组服务时的经历:方法:根据视网膜国际组织(Retina International)开展的焦点小组活动设计了一项在线调查,调查对象包括生活在全球不同地区的 IRD 患者及其家属。然后通过电子邮件通讯和社交网络向全球 43 个视网膜国际成员组织分发了调查问卷。调查涉及的问题包括:IRD基因组服务的可及性、可负担性和及时性,以及医护人员对IRD基因组服务的认知度:共有来自各大洲 30 多个国家的 410 名受访者(IRD 患者和护理人员)参与了调查。其中,40%的患者需要看 5 个以上的医生,27%的患者需要看 5 个以上的诊所,57%的患者需要等待 3 年以上才能获得基因诊断。此外,46% 的受访者表示在接受基因检测前没有接受过基因咨询,39% 的受访者表示在接受基因检测后没有接受过基因咨询。超过四分之三的受访者表示,他们无需为 IRD 的基因组服务付费。37%的受访者表示,他们的眼科专业人员要么不了解基因检测,要么保持中立,要么不鼓励他们接受基因检测:结论:IRD 患者无法公平地获得最佳基因检测和咨询服务。眼科护理专业人员需要加强对遗传性视网膜变性以及基因检测和基因咨询对患者和家属的益处的认识和培训。需要为IRD患者提供基因组服务的最佳实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes after implantation of a novel binocular complementary extended depth of focus intraocular lens compared to bilateral low near-add multifocal intraocular lenses. Efficacy and durability of Faricimab in naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Nomogram Construction for Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Caregiver Experience Survey of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Evaluation of Macular Thickness in Glaucoma Patients Using Prostaglandin Analog Eye Drops Undergoing Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C: Prospective, Comparative, Randomized, Masked Examiner Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1