The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2024-02-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406207231218624
Margareth C Ozelo, Cedric Hermans, Manuel Carcao, Benoît Guillet, Joan Gu, Randy Guerra, Leilei Tang, Kate Khair
{"title":"The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study.","authors":"Margareth C Ozelo, Cedric Hermans, Manuel Carcao, Benoît Guillet, Joan Gu, Randy Guerra, Leilei Tang, Kate Khair","doi":"10.1177/20406207231218624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-world data assessing treatment outcomes in patients with hemophilia A in routine clinical practice are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate/severe hemophilia A receiving treatment in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The international Antihemophilic Factor Hemophilia A Outcome Database study is an observational, noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This planned interim data read-out was conducted following 7 years of observation of patients receiving octocog alfa (cut-off, 30 June 2020). The primary endpoint was joint health status, assessed by the Gilbert Score. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), health-related quality of life, consumption, and safety. This <i>post hoc</i> analysis stratified data by hemophilia severity at baseline [moderate, factor VIII (FVIII) 1-5%; severe, FVIII <1%].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 711 patients in this analysis, 582 (82%) were receiving prophylaxis with octocog alfa at enrollment, and 498 (70%) had severe disease. Median Gilbert Scores were higher with on-demand therapy <i>versus</i> prophylaxis and scores were comparable in moderate and severe disease. In patients receiving prophylaxis, there was an improvement in HJHS Global Gait Score over 7 years of follow-up overall and in patients with severe disease. ABRs and annualized joint bleeding rates were low across all 7 years. An ABR of zero was reported in 34-56% of prophylaxis patients <i>versus</i> 20-40% in the on-demand group. ABRs were similar in severe and moderate disease. In total, 13/702 (1.9%) patients experienced 18 treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data demonstrate the long-term effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A, especially in those receiving prophylaxis. The high number of patients receiving on-demand treatment experiencing zero bleeds could be due to selection bias within the study, with patients with less severe disease more likely to be receiving on-demand treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02078427.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207231218624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Real-world data assessing treatment outcomes in patients with hemophilia A in routine clinical practice are limited.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate/severe hemophilia A receiving treatment in clinical practice.

Design: The international Antihemophilic Factor Hemophilia A Outcome Database study is an observational, noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study.

Methods: This planned interim data read-out was conducted following 7 years of observation of patients receiving octocog alfa (cut-off, 30 June 2020). The primary endpoint was joint health status, assessed by the Gilbert Score. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), health-related quality of life, consumption, and safety. This post hoc analysis stratified data by hemophilia severity at baseline [moderate, factor VIII (FVIII) 1-5%; severe, FVIII <1%].

Results: Of the 711 patients in this analysis, 582 (82%) were receiving prophylaxis with octocog alfa at enrollment, and 498 (70%) had severe disease. Median Gilbert Scores were higher with on-demand therapy versus prophylaxis and scores were comparable in moderate and severe disease. In patients receiving prophylaxis, there was an improvement in HJHS Global Gait Score over 7 years of follow-up overall and in patients with severe disease. ABRs and annualized joint bleeding rates were low across all 7 years. An ABR of zero was reported in 34-56% of prophylaxis patients versus 20-40% in the on-demand group. ABRs were similar in severe and moderate disease. In total, 13/702 (1.9%) patients experienced 18 treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the long-term effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A, especially in those receiving prophylaxis. The high number of patients receiving on-demand treatment experiencing zero bleeds could be due to selection bias within the study, with patients with less severe disease more likely to be receiving on-demand treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02078427.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
octocog alfa 对 A 型血友病患者的有效性和安全性:真实世界 AHEAD 国际研究长达 7 年的随访。
背景:在常规临床实践中,评估血友病 A 患者治疗效果的真实世界数据非常有限:评估血友病 A 患者在常规临床实践中治疗效果的真实世界数据非常有限:评估在临床实践中接受治疗的中度/重度血友病 A 患者使用辛可格α的有效性和安全性:国际抗血友病因子血友病 A 型结果数据库研究是一项观察性、非介入性、前瞻性、多中心研究:在对接受辛可克α治疗的患者进行 7 年观察后(截止日期为 2020 年 6 月 30 日),计划进行中期数据读取。主要终点是关节健康状况,通过吉尔伯特评分进行评估。次要终点包括年化出血率 (ABR)、血友病关节健康评分 (HJHS)、健康相关生活质量、消耗量和安全性。这项事后分析根据基线时血友病的严重程度对数据进行了分层[中度,因子 VIII (FVIII) 1-5%;重度,因子 VIII 结果]:在参与分析的 711 名患者中,582 人(82%)在入组时接受了辛可格α的预防治疗,498 人(70%)病情严重。按需治疗与预防治疗的吉尔伯特评分中位数更高,中度和重度患者的评分相当。在接受预防性治疗的患者中,经过7年的随访,HJHS总体步态评分总体上有所改善,重症患者的步态评分也有所改善。所有 7 年的 ABR 和年化关节出血率都很低。34-56%的预防性治疗患者的ABR为零,而按需治疗组为20-40%。重度和中度患者的 ABR 相似。13/702(1.9%)名患者共发生了18次与治疗相关的不良事件:这些数据证明了辛可格α对中度和重度 A 型血友病患者的长期有效性和安全性,尤其是对接受预防性治疗的患者。接受按需治疗的患者中出现零出血的人数较多,这可能是由于研究中存在选择偏差,病情较轻的患者更有可能接受按需治疗:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02078427。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of crizanlizumab in patients with sickle cell disease: final results from the phase II SOLACE-adults study. Long-term risks of cardiovascular-specific mortality among myeloproliferative neoplasms patients. Clinical features and treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with secondary myelofibrosis: a retrospective study. Real-world efficacy of chidamide plus R-CHOP in newly diagnosed double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Iron deficiency anemia: an early clinical presentation of cytomegalovirus-induced hemorrhagic colitis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients under dasatinib treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1