Inhaled Corticosteroids May Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Pneumonia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.4046/trd.2023.0176
Min-Seok Chang, In-So Cho, Iseul Yu, Sunmin Park, Seok Jeong Lee, Suk Joong Yong, Won-Yeon Lee, Sang-Ha Kim, Ji-Ho Lee
{"title":"Inhaled Corticosteroids May Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Pneumonia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Min-Seok Chang, In-So Cho, Iseul Yu, Sunmin Park, Seok Jeong Lee, Suk Joong Yong, Won-Yeon Lee, Sang-Ha Kim, Ji-Ho Lee","doi":"10.4046/trd.2023.0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is reportedly associated with a higher risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the clinical implications of ICS have not been sufficiently verified to determine their effect on the prognosis of pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic health records of patients hospitalized for pneumonia with underlying COPD were retrospectively reviewed. Pneumonia was confirmed using chest radiography or computed tomography. The clinical outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD who received ICS and those who received long-acting bronchodilators other than ICS were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 255 hospitalized patients, 89 met the inclusion criteria. The numbers of ICS and non-ICS users were 46 and 43, respectively. The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years) scores at the initial presentation of pneumonia were comparable between the two groups. The proportions of patients with multilobar infiltration, pleural effusion, and complicated pneumonia in the radiological studies did not vary between the two groups. Additionally, the defervescence time, proportion of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stays, and mortality rate at 30 and 90 days were not significantly different between the two groups. ICS use and blood eosinophils count were not associated with all pneumonia outcomes and mortality in multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical outcomes of pneumonia following ICS use in patients with COPD did not differ from those in patients treated without ICS. Thus, ICS may not contribute to the severity and outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"319-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2023.0176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is reportedly associated with a higher risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the clinical implications of ICS have not been sufficiently verified to determine their effect on the prognosis of pneumonia.

Methods: The electronic health records of patients hospitalized for pneumonia with underlying COPD were retrospectively reviewed. Pneumonia was confirmed using chest radiography or computed tomography. The clinical outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD who received ICS and those who received long-acting bronchodilators other than ICS were compared.

Results: Among the 255 hospitalized patients, 89 met the inclusion criteria. The numbers of ICS and non-ICS users were 46 and 43, respectively. The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years) scores at the initial presentation of pneumonia were comparable between the two groups. The proportions of patients with multilobar infiltration, pleural effusion, and complicated pneumonia in the radiological studies did not vary between the two groups. Additionally, the defervescence time, proportion of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stays, and mortality rate at 30 and 90 days were not significantly different between the two groups. ICS use and blood eosinophils count were not associated with all pneumonia outcomes and mortality in multivariate analyses.

Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of pneumonia following ICS use in patients with COPD did not differ from those in patients treated without ICS. Thus, ICS may not contribute to the severity and outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入皮质类固醇可能不会影响慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺炎的临床疗效。
背景:据报道,虽然吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)与慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者患肺炎的风险较高有关,但 ICS 的临床影响尚未得到充分验证,因此无法确定其对肺炎预后的影响:方法:对因肺炎住院并伴有慢性阻塞性肺病的患者的电子病历进行回顾性研究。肺炎通过胸片或计算机断层扫描确认。比较了接受 ICS 和接受 ICS 以外的长效支气管扩张剂的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺炎临床结果:在 255 名住院患者中,有 89 人符合纳入标准。使用 ICS 和未使用 ICS 的患者人数分别为 46 人和 43 人。两组患者在肺炎初诊时的 CURB-65 评分相当。两组患者在放射学检查中出现多叶浸润、胸腔积液和复杂性肺炎的比例没有差异。此外,两组患者的延期时间、机械通气比例、入住重症监护室、住院时间以及 30 天和 90 天的死亡率均无显著差异。在多变量分析中,使用 ICS 和血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数与所有肺炎结果和死亡率无关:结论:慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用 ICS 后的肺炎临床结果与未使用 ICS 的患者没有差异。因此,ICS 可能不会导致慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺炎的严重程度和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of Lung Cysts in Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome from Patients with Multiple Lung Cysts. Request for Study Design Modification in Examining Nutritional Intake and Muscle Strength in Individuals with Airflow Limitation. Air Pollution and Interstitial Lung Disease. Dry Medical Thoracoscopy with Artificial Pneumothorax Induction Using Veress Needle. Clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to smoking status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1