Daydreaming and grandiose delusions: development of the Qualities of Daydreaming Scale.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1017/S1352465824000018
Louise Isham, Bao Sheng Loe, Alice Hicks, Natalie Wilson, Richard P Bentall, Daniel Freeman
{"title":"Daydreaming and grandiose delusions: development of the Qualities of Daydreaming Scale.","authors":"Louise Isham, Bao Sheng Loe, Alice Hicks, Natalie Wilson, Richard P Bentall, Daniel Freeman","doi":"10.1017/S1352465824000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daydreaming may contribute to the maintenance of grandiose delusions. Repeated, pleasant and vivid daydreams about the content of grandiose delusions may keep the ideas in mind, elaborate the details, and increase the degree of conviction in the delusion. Pleasant daydreams more generally could contribute to elevated mood, which may influence the delusion content.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to develop a brief questionnaire, suitable for research and clinical practice, to assess daydreaming and test potential associations with grandiosity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>798 patients with psychosis (375 with grandiose delusions) and 4518 non-clinical adults (1788 with high grandiosity) were recruited. Participants completed a daydreaming item pool and measures of grandiosity, time spent thinking about the grandiose belief, and grandiose belief conviction. Factor analysis was used to derive the Qualities of Daydreaming Scale (QuOD) and associations were tested using pairwise correlations and structural equation modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire had three factors: realism, pleasantness, and frequency of daydreams. The measure was invariant across clinical and non-clinical groups. Internal consistency was good (alpha-ordinals: realism=0.86, pleasantness=0.93, frequency=0.82) as was test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient=0.75). Daydreaming scores were higher in patients with grandiose delusions than in patients without grandiose delusions or in the non-clinical group. Daydreaming was significantly associated with grandiosity, time spent thinking about the grandiose delusion, and grandiose delusion conviction, explaining 19.1, 7.7 and 5.2% of the variance in the clinical group data, respectively. Similar associations were found in the non-clinical group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The process of daydreaming may be one target in psychological interventions for grandiose delusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465824000018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Daydreaming may contribute to the maintenance of grandiose delusions. Repeated, pleasant and vivid daydreams about the content of grandiose delusions may keep the ideas in mind, elaborate the details, and increase the degree of conviction in the delusion. Pleasant daydreams more generally could contribute to elevated mood, which may influence the delusion content.

Aims: We sought to develop a brief questionnaire, suitable for research and clinical practice, to assess daydreaming and test potential associations with grandiosity.

Method: 798 patients with psychosis (375 with grandiose delusions) and 4518 non-clinical adults (1788 with high grandiosity) were recruited. Participants completed a daydreaming item pool and measures of grandiosity, time spent thinking about the grandiose belief, and grandiose belief conviction. Factor analysis was used to derive the Qualities of Daydreaming Scale (QuOD) and associations were tested using pairwise correlations and structural equation modelling.

Results: The questionnaire had three factors: realism, pleasantness, and frequency of daydreams. The measure was invariant across clinical and non-clinical groups. Internal consistency was good (alpha-ordinals: realism=0.86, pleasantness=0.93, frequency=0.82) as was test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient=0.75). Daydreaming scores were higher in patients with grandiose delusions than in patients without grandiose delusions or in the non-clinical group. Daydreaming was significantly associated with grandiosity, time spent thinking about the grandiose delusion, and grandiose delusion conviction, explaining 19.1, 7.7 and 5.2% of the variance in the clinical group data, respectively. Similar associations were found in the non-clinical group.

Conclusions: The process of daydreaming may be one target in psychological interventions for grandiose delusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白日梦和妄想症:白日梦特质量表的开发。
背景:白日梦可能有助于维持宏大妄想。反复、愉快和生动地做有关宏伟妄想内容的白日梦,可能会让人牢记这些想法,详细阐述细节,并增加对妄想的确信程度。一般来说,愉快的白日梦可能有助于情绪高涨,而情绪高涨可能会影响妄想的内容。目的:我们试图编制一份适合研究和临床实践的简短问卷,以评估白日梦,并测试白日梦与好大喜功的潜在关联:方法:我们招募了 798 名精神病患者(其中 375 人患有夸大妄想症)和 4518 名非临床成年人(其中 1788 人患有高度自大症)。受试者完成了白日梦项目库、好大喜功程度测量、思考好大喜功信念所花费的时间以及好大喜功信念的信念度。通过因子分析得出了白日梦素质量表(QuOD),并使用成对相关性和结构方程模型对相关性进行了检验:问卷包含三个因子:白日梦的现实性、愉悦性和频率。在不同的临床和非临床组别中,该测量方法是不变的。内部一致性良好(α系数:现实性=0.86,愉悦性=0.93,频率=0.82),测试-再测可靠性也很好(类内系数=0.75)。有妄想症的患者白日梦得分高于无妄想症的患者或非临床组。在临床组数据中,白日梦与好大喜功、花在思考宏伟妄想上的时间和宏伟妄想信念有明显关联,分别解释了19.1%、7.7%和5.2%的变异。在非临床组中也发现了类似的关联:结论:白日梦过程可能是大妄想心理干预的一个目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
期刊最新文献
'Flashforward' mental imagery in adolescents: exploring developmental differences and associations with mental health. Influential Relationship Questionnaire (IRQ): psychometric characteristics of an abbreviated Spanish version. The outcomes of imagery-focused interventions in relation to distress in people with delusions: a systematic literature review. The relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Telehealth-delivered recovery-orientated well-being plan group program for bipolar disorder: a pilot randomised feasibility and acceptability study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1