Nitrogen fertilizer source, rate, placement, and application timing effect on sorghum (grain and forage) and corn grain yields

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20469
Johnathan D. Holman, Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz, Augustine K. Obour, Yared Assefa
{"title":"Nitrogen fertilizer source, rate, placement, and application timing effect on sorghum (grain and forage) and corn grain yields","authors":"Johnathan D. Holman,&nbsp;Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz,&nbsp;Augustine K. Obour,&nbsp;Yared Assefa","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying the limiting nutrient, fertilizer source, rate, placement, additives, and timing of application are critical components of fertilizer management. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilizer source, rate, placement method, additives, application timing, and environment on yields of grain sorghum, forage sorghum [<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> (L.) Moench], and corn (for grain, <i>Zea mays</i> L.). Independent field experiments were conducted at 13 different environments in Kansas from 2008 through 2013 on grain sorghum, forage sorghum, and corn. Treatments were an incomplete factorial combination of four fertilizer placement methods, three fertilizer types, five fertilizer additives, three fertilizer application times, and six fertilizer rates that varied by location and across years. Results showed grain and forage sorghum yields responded to N fertilizer in environments that were not extremely dry (&lt;136 mm) or wet (&gt;651 mm). Corn responded to N fertilizer application only in high-precipitation environments. For grain sorghum, where rate × placement × source × additive interaction was significant, broadcast application of urea (source) at high rates (67–134 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), with summer application timing, or with additive in winter (with environmentally smart nitrogen [ESN]) resulted in up to 43% greater yield compared with application of urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN; source) and surface band (placement) at 67 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> without additives. In the one site-year where forage sorghum responded to fertilizer application, forage yields with preplant application of UAN at 56–140 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> were 164% greater than the control. For corn, application of either urea or UAN fertilizer, UAN in coulter or surface band, with ESN blend, applied at planting, and at highest rates (160 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) resulted in best yields compared with the alternatives and 110% greater yield compared with the unfertilized control. We concluded that fertilizer rate is an important management component as it consistently affected yield regardless of crop considered. Fertilizer placement and timing have crop-specific importance as they were significant for only corn, but the main effect of additives (N stabilizers) was not significant for any of the crops. Environment and crop type influenced crop response to N fertilizer rate, timing, placement, and additives.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20469","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the limiting nutrient, fertilizer source, rate, placement, additives, and timing of application are critical components of fertilizer management. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilizer source, rate, placement method, additives, application timing, and environment on yields of grain sorghum, forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and corn (for grain, Zea mays L.). Independent field experiments were conducted at 13 different environments in Kansas from 2008 through 2013 on grain sorghum, forage sorghum, and corn. Treatments were an incomplete factorial combination of four fertilizer placement methods, three fertilizer types, five fertilizer additives, three fertilizer application times, and six fertilizer rates that varied by location and across years. Results showed grain and forage sorghum yields responded to N fertilizer in environments that were not extremely dry (<136 mm) or wet (>651 mm). Corn responded to N fertilizer application only in high-precipitation environments. For grain sorghum, where rate × placement × source × additive interaction was significant, broadcast application of urea (source) at high rates (67–134 kg N ha−1), with summer application timing, or with additive in winter (with environmentally smart nitrogen [ESN]) resulted in up to 43% greater yield compared with application of urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN; source) and surface band (placement) at 67 kg ha−1 without additives. In the one site-year where forage sorghum responded to fertilizer application, forage yields with preplant application of UAN at 56–140 kg ha−1 were 164% greater than the control. For corn, application of either urea or UAN fertilizer, UAN in coulter or surface band, with ESN blend, applied at planting, and at highest rates (160 kg ha−1) resulted in best yields compared with the alternatives and 110% greater yield compared with the unfertilized control. We concluded that fertilizer rate is an important management component as it consistently affected yield regardless of crop considered. Fertilizer placement and timing have crop-specific importance as they were significant for only corn, but the main effect of additives (N stabilizers) was not significant for any of the crops. Environment and crop type influenced crop response to N fertilizer rate, timing, placement, and additives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氮肥来源、施肥量、施肥位置和施肥时间对高粱(谷物和饲料)和玉米籽粒产量的影响
确定限制性养分、肥料来源、施肥量、施肥方法、添加剂和施肥时机是肥料管理的关键要素。本研究旨在量化氮肥来源、施肥量、施肥方法、添加剂、施肥时间和环境对谷物高粱、饲用高粱 [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] 和玉米(谷物玉米)产量的影响。从 2008 年到 2013 年,在堪萨斯州的 13 个不同环境中对谷物高粱、饲料高粱和玉米进行了独立的田间试验。试验采用四种施肥方法、三种肥料类型、五种肥料添加剂、三种施肥时间和六种施肥量的不完全因子组合进行处理,不同地区和不同年份的处理方法各不相同。结果表明,在非极端干旱(136 毫米)或极端潮湿(651 毫米)的环境中,谷物和饲料高粱的产量对氮肥有反应。玉米只在高降水环境中对氮肥的施用有反应。在施肥量 × 施肥位置 × 肥料来源 × 添加剂交互作用显著的情况下,与施用尿素-硝酸铵(UAN;肥料来源)和表面带(施肥位置)67 千克/公顷(不含添加剂)相比,高施肥量(67-134 千克/公顷)、夏季施肥或冬季施肥(含环境智能氮[ESN])的谷物高粱产量最多可提高 43%。在牧草高粱对施肥有反应的一个地点年,播种前施用 56-140 千克/公顷尿素-硝酸铵的牧草产量比对照高出 164%。对于玉米,在播种时施用尿素或尿素氮肥料、犁刀式或表面带式尿素氮肥料、ESN 混合物以及最高施肥量(160 千克/公顷),与其他替代品相比产量最高,与未施肥对照相比产量提高 110%。我们得出的结论是,肥料用量是一个重要的管理要素,因为无论考虑哪种作物,肥料用量都会对产量产生影响。施肥量和施肥时间对特定作物有重要影响,因为它们只对玉米有显著影响,但添加剂(氮稳定剂)的主要影响对任何作物都不显著。环境和作物类型影响着作物对氮肥用量、施肥时间、施肥位置和添加剂的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kinetics of Cd adsorption by biochar, activated carbon, and zeolite in some calcareous soils Comparative analysis of RNN versus IIR digital filtering to optimize resilience to dynamic perturbations in pH sensing for vertical farming Soil greenhouse gas emissions under enhanced efficiency and urea nitrogen fertilizer from Australian irrigated aerobic rice production Changes in the population and diversity of plant parasitic nematodes and their effects on sugarcane growth at Wonji-Shoa Sugar Estate, Ethiopia Application of univariate, multivariate, and mixed models to the stability analysis of Ethiopian tetraploid wheat cultivars under irrigation condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1