In Vitro Head-to-Head Comparison of Flow Reduction between Fibered and Non-Fibered Pushable Coils.

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurointervention Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.5469/neuroint.2024.00031
Jong-Tae Yoon, Boseong Kwon, Joon Ho Choi, Sun Moon Hwang, Mihyeon Kim, Sungbin Hwang, Yunsun Song, Deok Hee Lee
{"title":"In Vitro Head-to-Head Comparison of Flow Reduction between Fibered and Non-Fibered Pushable Coils.","authors":"Jong-Tae Yoon, Boseong Kwon, Joon Ho Choi, Sun Moon Hwang, Mihyeon Kim, Sungbin Hwang, Yunsun Song, Deok Hee Lee","doi":"10.5469/neuroint.2024.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the embolization effects of a non-fibered pushable coil with a conventional fibered pushable coil in an in vitro bench-top experiment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A simplified vascular phantom with 4 channels (1 for the non-fibered coil, 1 for the fibered coil, and 2 for continuous circuit flow) was used. A single coil of the longest length was inserted to evaluate the effect of single-coil embolization, and 3 consecutive coils were inserted to assess the effect of multiple-coil embolization. Post-embolization angiography was performed to obtain flow variables (time to peak [TTP], relative peak intensity [rPI], and angiographic flow reduction score [AFRS]) from time density curves. The packing densities of the two coil types were calculated, and the AFRS of each channel was determined by dividing the TTP by the rPI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When inserting a single coil, the conventional fibered coil demonstrated better flow reduction, as indicated by a higher AFRS (25.6 vs. 17.4, P=0.034). However, the non-fibered coil exhibited a significantly higher packing density (12.9 vs. 2.4, P=0.001). Similar trends were observed with multiple coils.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conventional fibered pushable coil showed better flow reduction efficiency, while the non-fibered pushable coil had a higher packing density, likely due to the flexibility of the coil loops. A better understanding of the distinct characteristics of different pushable coils can enhance the outcomes of various vascular embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19140,"journal":{"name":"Neurointervention","volume":" ","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2024.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the embolization effects of a non-fibered pushable coil with a conventional fibered pushable coil in an in vitro bench-top experiment.

Materials and methods: A simplified vascular phantom with 4 channels (1 for the non-fibered coil, 1 for the fibered coil, and 2 for continuous circuit flow) was used. A single coil of the longest length was inserted to evaluate the effect of single-coil embolization, and 3 consecutive coils were inserted to assess the effect of multiple-coil embolization. Post-embolization angiography was performed to obtain flow variables (time to peak [TTP], relative peak intensity [rPI], and angiographic flow reduction score [AFRS]) from time density curves. The packing densities of the two coil types were calculated, and the AFRS of each channel was determined by dividing the TTP by the rPI.

Results: When inserting a single coil, the conventional fibered coil demonstrated better flow reduction, as indicated by a higher AFRS (25.6 vs. 17.4, P=0.034). However, the non-fibered coil exhibited a significantly higher packing density (12.9 vs. 2.4, P=0.001). Similar trends were observed with multiple coils.

Conclusion: The conventional fibered pushable coil showed better flow reduction efficiency, while the non-fibered pushable coil had a higher packing density, likely due to the flexibility of the coil loops. A better understanding of the distinct characteristics of different pushable coils can enhance the outcomes of various vascular embolization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外头对头比较纤维和非纤维可推动线圈的流量减少情况
目的:在体外台式实验中比较非纤维可推线圈与传统纤维可推线圈的栓塞效果:使用一个简化的血管模型,该模型有 4 个通道(1 个用于非纤维线圈,1 个用于纤维线圈,2 个用于连续电路流)。插入一个最长的线圈以评估单线圈栓塞的效果,连续插入 3 个线圈以评估多线圈栓塞的效果。栓塞后进行血管造影,通过时间密度曲线获得血流变量(达峰时间[TTP]、相对峰值强度[rPI]和血管造影血流减少评分[AFRS])。计算了两种线圈的堆积密度,并用 TTP 除以 rPI 得出了每个通道的 AFRS:结果:插入单个线圈时,传统纤维线圈能更好地减少血流,AFRS 较高(25.6 对 17.4,P=0.034)。不过,无纤维线圈的堆积密度明显更高(12.9 对 2.4,P=0.001)。多个线圈也观察到类似的趋势:结论:传统的纤维可推线圈具有更好的减流效率,而非纤维可推线圈具有更高的堆积密度,这可能是由于线圈环的灵活性。更好地了解不同可推动线圈的不同特性可提高各种血管栓塞的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transulnar Arterial Access for Intra-Operative Cerebral Angiography during Prone Cerebrovascular Surgery. Ultrasound-Guided Retrograde Internal Jugular Venous Puncture in Neurointerventional Procedures. The Woven EndoBridge for Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study of 120 Cases with Expanded Indications Covering All Subtypes. Axillary Artery Access for Neuroendovascular Procedures in Infants: Where to Go When Femoral Puncture Fails? Infarct Location Matters: Basal Ganglia Involvement Predicts Poor Outcomes despite Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1