Mediation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in caregivers of patients with first-stroke in China: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2318087
Sitong Wang, Qingwen Lu, Dan Zhang, Liqun Wang, Hongxu Jin, Yu Zhou, Ruihang Ma
{"title":"Mediation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in caregivers of patients with first-stroke in China: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Sitong Wang, Qingwen Lu, Dan Zhang, Liqun Wang, Hongxu Jin, Yu Zhou, Ruihang Ma","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2318087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-efficacy, perceived social support, and resilience in caregivers of first-stroke patients are closely related, while the interaction mechanism remains unclear. This research explores the mediation effect of self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in caregivers of first-stroke patients in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Convenience sampling was designed and used to recruit participants from the General Hospital of Northern Theater in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China, from February to October 2022, in which 207 self-reported participants completed the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES). In addition, the mediation effect of self-efficacy between perceived social support and resilience was determined by the PROCESS macro for SPSS.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among the 207 caregivers of patients with first-stroke, the mean CD-RISC, MSPPS and GSES scores were (72.17 ± 11.28), (71.17 ± 8.99), and (29.64 ± 5.03) respectively. Caregivers' self-efficacy was positively correlated with perceived social support (<i>r</i> = 0.439, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and resilience (<i>r</i> = 0.730, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Self-efficacy served a mediation function partially between perceived social support and resilience, whose effect accounted for 52.90% of the total.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both simple and mediation roles of perceived social support and self-efficacy are established in the relationship of resilience among caregivers of first-stroke patients. Positive social support and self-efficacy are two important targets for future interventional studies, and interventions on them may synergistically improve resilience. Hence, the nurses and community workers should correctly evaluate social support and self-efficacy, confirm the health education requirements, and implement counseling intervention to protect and improve the health of first-stroke patients and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2318087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-efficacy, perceived social support, and resilience in caregivers of first-stroke patients are closely related, while the interaction mechanism remains unclear. This research explores the mediation effect of self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in caregivers of first-stroke patients in China.

Methods: Convenience sampling was designed and used to recruit participants from the General Hospital of Northern Theater in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China, from February to October 2022, in which 207 self-reported participants completed the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES). In addition, the mediation effect of self-efficacy between perceived social support and resilience was determined by the PROCESS macro for SPSS.

Result: Among the 207 caregivers of patients with first-stroke, the mean CD-RISC, MSPPS and GSES scores were (72.17 ± 11.28), (71.17 ± 8.99), and (29.64 ± 5.03) respectively. Caregivers' self-efficacy was positively correlated with perceived social support (r = 0.439, p < 0.01) and resilience (r = 0.730, p < 0.01). Self-efficacy served a mediation function partially between perceived social support and resilience, whose effect accounted for 52.90% of the total.

Conclusion: Both simple and mediation roles of perceived social support and self-efficacy are established in the relationship of resilience among caregivers of first-stroke patients. Positive social support and self-efficacy are two important targets for future interventional studies, and interventions on them may synergistically improve resilience. Hence, the nurses and community workers should correctly evaluate social support and self-efficacy, confirm the health education requirements, and implement counseling intervention to protect and improve the health of first-stroke patients and their families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我效能对中国首次脑卒中患者照护者感知到的社会支持与复原力之间关系的中介效应:一项横断面调查。
背景:首次脑卒中患者照护者的自我效能感、感知到的社会支持与抗逆力密切相关,但其相互作用机制尚不清楚。本研究探讨了自我效能感在中国脑卒中患者照护者感知到的社会支持与复原力之间的中介效应:方法:研究人员于2022年2月至10月在辽宁省沈阳市北部战区总医院设计并采用便利抽样法招募参与者,其中207名自我报告参与者完成了康纳-戴维森复原力量表(CD-RISC)、感知社会支持多维量表(MSPSS)和一般自我效能感量表(GSES)。此外,还利用 SPSS 的 PROCESS 宏确定了自我效能在感知社会支持和复原力之间的中介效应:在 207 名首次脑卒中患者的护理者中,CD-RISC、MSPPS 和 GSES 的平均得分分别为(72.17±11.28)分、(71.17±8.99)分和(29.64±5.03)分。照顾者的自我效能感与感知到的社会支持呈正相关(r = 0.439,p r = 0.730,p 结论:照顾者的自我效能感与感知到的社会支持呈正相关:感知到的社会支持和自我效能感在初诊脑卒中患者护理者的抗逆力关系中起到了简单和中介的作用。积极的社会支持和自我效能感是未来干预研究的两个重要目标,对它们的干预可以协同提高复原力。因此,护士和社区工作者应正确评估社会支持和自我效能感,确认健康教育要求,实施咨询干预,以保护和改善首次脑卒中患者及其家庭的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
期刊最新文献
What do employers need when supporting stroke survivors to return to work?: a mixed-methods study. Effects of end-effector robotic arm reach training with functional electrical stimulation for chronic stroke survivors. The minimal clinically important difference of two multifaceted fatigue evaluation questionnaires in chronic stroke. The psychometric properties of the PROMIS® profile CAT in people with stroke. Development of the Japanese version of the stroke stigma scale: a validity and reliability assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1