The Effects of Australia's First Residential Peer-Support Suicide Prevention and Recovery Centre (SPARC).

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000939
Sanne Oostermeijer, Amy Morgan, Natalie Cheesmond, Rachel Green, Nicola Reavley
{"title":"The Effects of Australia's First Residential Peer-Support Suicide Prevention and Recovery Centre (SPARC).","authors":"Sanne Oostermeijer, Amy Morgan, Natalie Cheesmond, Rachel Green, Nicola Reavley","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Aim:</i> This paper reports preliminary evidence of the impacts of Australia's first residential peer-support service for people at risk of suicide. <i>Methods:</i> Psychological distress was measured preintervention, postintervention, and after 3 months and analyzed using paired <i>t</i> tests. Interviews were held postintervention and were analyzed using thematic analysis. <i>Results:</i> Psychological distress significantly improved from preintervention to postintervention (<i>n</i> = 16, <i>d</i> = 1.77) and at follow-up (<i>n</i> = 5, <i>d</i> = 1.12). Interviews (<i>n</i> = 10) indicated that participants experienced improvements in mental well-being and feelings of connectedness, respite, and confidence to engage with other services. The peer-support workers were key. Some participants felt that the location was too remote, too little information was given, and a longer stay would have been preferable. <i>Limitations:</i> The study did not include a control group, the sample was relatively small, and participants may have been subject to socially desirable answers. <i>Conclusions:</i> These findings indicate that residential peer-support services potentially offer a valuable alternative to conventional inpatient treatment for people at risk of suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This paper reports preliminary evidence of the impacts of Australia's first residential peer-support service for people at risk of suicide. Methods: Psychological distress was measured preintervention, postintervention, and after 3 months and analyzed using paired t tests. Interviews were held postintervention and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Psychological distress significantly improved from preintervention to postintervention (n = 16, d = 1.77) and at follow-up (n = 5, d = 1.12). Interviews (n = 10) indicated that participants experienced improvements in mental well-being and feelings of connectedness, respite, and confidence to engage with other services. The peer-support workers were key. Some participants felt that the location was too remote, too little information was given, and a longer stay would have been preferable. Limitations: The study did not include a control group, the sample was relatively small, and participants may have been subject to socially desirable answers. Conclusions: These findings indicate that residential peer-support services potentially offer a valuable alternative to conventional inpatient treatment for people at risk of suicide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚首个寄宿式同伴支持自杀预防和康复中心(SPARC)的效果。
目的:本文报告了澳大利亚首个针对自杀高危人群的寄宿同伴支持服务所产生影响的初步证据。方法对干预前、干预后和 3 个月后的心理困扰进行测量,并使用配对 t 检验进行分析。干预后进行了访谈,并采用主题分析法进行了分析。结果从干预前到干预后(n = 16,d = 1.77)和随访时(n = 5,d = 1.12),心理困扰明显改善。访谈(n = 10)显示,参与者的心理健康得到了改善,并感受到了与他人的联系、喘息机会以及参与其他服务的信心。同伴支持工作者是关键。一些参与者认为,活动地点太偏远,提供的信息太少,最好能逗留更长时间。局限性:研究没有包括对照组,样本相对较少,参与者可能会回答社会需要的答案。结论这些研究结果表明,住院同伴支持服务有可能为有自杀风险的人提供一种有价值的替代传统住院治疗的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
Testing the Three-Step Theory of Suicide. Holding the Line - Mental Well-Being, Stressors, and Coping in Crisis Supporters. Hidden in Plain Sight - Staff Exposure to Suicide and Responses to a New, Systemic Model of Workplace Postvention. The Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation According to Occupation and Other Employment Variables. Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1