Strategies to mitigate moral distress as reported by eldercare professionals.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1080/17482631.2024.2315635
Tiina Koivisto, Maria Paavolainen, Nina Olin, Eveliina Korkiakangas, Jaana Laitinen
{"title":"Strategies to mitigate moral distress as reported by eldercare professionals.","authors":"Tiina Koivisto, Maria Paavolainen, Nina Olin, Eveliina Korkiakangas, Jaana Laitinen","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2315635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eldercare workers experience higher levels of moral distress than other health and social care service workers. Moral distress is a psychological response to a morally challenging event. Very little is known about moral distress in the context of eldercare and about the mechanisms of preventing or mitigating moral distress. This qualitative study was conducted as part of the \"Ensuring the availability of staff and the attractiveness of the sector in eldercareservices\" project in Finland in 2021. The data were from 39 semi-structured interviews. This qualitative interview data were examined using two-stage content analysis. The key finding of this study, as reported by eldercare professionals, is that strategies to mitigate moral distress can be found at all organizational levels : organizational, workplace and individual. The tools that emerged from the interviews fell into four main categories:) organizational support and education 2) peer support 3) improving self-care and competence and 4) defending patients. The main identified categories confirmed the earlier findings but the qualitative, rich research interview data provided new insights into a little-studied topic: mitigating moral distress in eldercare. The main conclusion is that, in order to mitigate moral distress, ethical competence needs to be strengthened at all organizational levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"19 1","pages":"2315635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2315635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eldercare workers experience higher levels of moral distress than other health and social care service workers. Moral distress is a psychological response to a morally challenging event. Very little is known about moral distress in the context of eldercare and about the mechanisms of preventing or mitigating moral distress. This qualitative study was conducted as part of the "Ensuring the availability of staff and the attractiveness of the sector in eldercareservices" project in Finland in 2021. The data were from 39 semi-structured interviews. This qualitative interview data were examined using two-stage content analysis. The key finding of this study, as reported by eldercare professionals, is that strategies to mitigate moral distress can be found at all organizational levels : organizational, workplace and individual. The tools that emerged from the interviews fell into four main categories:) organizational support and education 2) peer support 3) improving self-care and competence and 4) defending patients. The main identified categories confirmed the earlier findings but the qualitative, rich research interview data provided new insights into a little-studied topic: mitigating moral distress in eldercare. The main conclusion is that, in order to mitigate moral distress, ethical competence needs to be strengthened at all organizational levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年护理专业人员报告的减轻道德困扰的策略。
与其他医疗和社会护理服务工作者相比,老年护理工作者的道德困扰程度更高。道德困扰是对道德挑战事件的一种心理反应。人们对老年护理工作中的道德困扰以及预防或减轻道德困扰的机制知之甚少。这项定性研究是 2021 年在芬兰开展的 "确保养老服务人员的可用性和该行业的吸引力 "项目的一部分。数据来自 39 个半结构化访谈。采用两阶段内容分析法对定性访谈数据进行了研究。根据老年护理专业人员的报告,本研究的主要发现是,减轻道德困扰的策略可以在组织、工作场所和个人等各个层面找到。访谈中发现的工具主要分为四类:1)组织支持和教育 2)同伴支持 3)提高自我护理和能力 4)为患者辩护。已确定的主要类别证实了之前的研究结果,但定性、丰富的研究访谈数据为一个鲜有研究的主题提供了新的见解:减轻老年护理中的道德困扰。主要结论是,为了减轻道德困扰,需要在所有组织层面加强道德能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
"It takes a lot of sisu to get through it"- managerial experiences of facing adversities during pandemic. A qualitative study on the caregiver burden experience in home reflux enema management of infants with congenital megacolon. Exploring the experiences of female undergraduate nursing students in providing home healthcare to older adults. Lost and changed meaning in life of people with Long Covid: a qualitative study. Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1