Studying Microbial Ecology of Diabetic Foot Infections: Significance of PCR Analysis for Prudent Antimicrobial Stewardship.

Deema Jaber, Nidal Younes, Enam Khalil, Abla Albsoul-Younes, Mohammed Zawiah, Amal G Al-Bakri
{"title":"Studying Microbial Ecology of Diabetic Foot Infections: Significance of PCR Analysis for Prudent Antimicrobial Stewardship.","authors":"Deema Jaber, Nidal Younes, Enam Khalil, Abla Albsoul-Younes, Mohammed Zawiah, Amal G Al-Bakri","doi":"10.1177/15347346241230288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the microbial ecology of diabetic foot infections (DFIs), using molecular-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis to accurately identify the causative agents. One hundred DFI patients were recruited and classified using the Depth Extent Phase and Associated Etiology (DEPA) score according to their severity. Results revealed polymicrobial infections in 75% of cases, predominantly featuring <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> (83%) and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (63%). Importantly, 20% of samples exhibited facultative anaerobes <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> or <i>Clostridium perfringens</i>, exclusively in high DEPA score ulcers. <i>Candida albicans</i> coinfection was identified in 19.2% of cases, underscoring the need for mycological evaluation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy regimens were tailored to DEPA severity, yet our findings highlighted a potential gap in methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) coverage. Despite an 88% prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococci</i>, vancomycin usage was suboptimal. This raises concerns about the underestimation of MRSA risk and the need for tailored antibiotic guidelines. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of molecular-PCR analysis in identifying diverse microbial communities in DFIs, influencing targeted antibiotic choices. The results advocate for refined antimicrobial guidelines, considering regional variations in microbial patterns and judiciously addressing multidrug-resistant strains. This research contributes crucial insights for optimizing DFIs management and helps the physicians to have a fast decision in selection the suitable antibiotic for each patient and to decrease the risk of bacterial resistance from the improper use of broad-spectrum empirical therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241230288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the microbial ecology of diabetic foot infections (DFIs), using molecular-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis to accurately identify the causative agents. One hundred DFI patients were recruited and classified using the Depth Extent Phase and Associated Etiology (DEPA) score according to their severity. Results revealed polymicrobial infections in 75% of cases, predominantly featuring Staphylococcus epidermidis (83%) and Staphylococcus aureus (63%). Importantly, 20% of samples exhibited facultative anaerobes Bacteroides fragilis or Clostridium perfringens, exclusively in high DEPA score ulcers. Candida albicans coinfection was identified in 19.2% of cases, underscoring the need for mycological evaluation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy regimens were tailored to DEPA severity, yet our findings highlighted a potential gap in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage. Despite an 88% prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococci, vancomycin usage was suboptimal. This raises concerns about the underestimation of MRSA risk and the need for tailored antibiotic guidelines. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of molecular-PCR analysis in identifying diverse microbial communities in DFIs, influencing targeted antibiotic choices. The results advocate for refined antimicrobial guidelines, considering regional variations in microbial patterns and judiciously addressing multidrug-resistant strains. This research contributes crucial insights for optimizing DFIs management and helps the physicians to have a fast decision in selection the suitable antibiotic for each patient and to decrease the risk of bacterial resistance from the improper use of broad-spectrum empirical therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究糖尿病足感染的微生物生态:PCR 分析对谨慎使用抗菌药物的意义。
本研究采用分子聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析法对糖尿病足感染(DFIs)的微生物生态学进行了全面调查,以准确确定致病菌。研究人员招募了 100 名糖尿病足感染患者,并根据其严重程度使用深度、广度和相关病因(DEPA)评分进行分类。结果显示,75%的病例为多微生物感染,主要是表皮葡萄球菌(83%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(63%)。重要的是,20%的样本中出现了兼性厌氧菌脆弱拟杆菌或产气荚膜梭菌,且仅出现在DEPA评分较高的溃疡中。在 19.2% 的病例中发现了白色念珠菌合并感染,这说明有必要进行真菌学评估。经验性抗菌治疗方案是根据 DEPA 严重程度量身定制的,但我们的研究结果凸显了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)覆盖率的潜在差距。尽管耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的发病率高达88%,但万古霉素的使用率却未达到最佳水平。这引起了人们对低估 MRSA 风险的担忧,并认为有必要制定有针对性的抗生素指南。我们的研究证明了分子 PCR 分析在确定 DFI 中不同微生物群落方面的功效,从而影响有针对性的抗生素选择。研究结果主张完善抗菌药物指南,考虑微生物模式的地区差异,明智地应对耐多药菌株。这项研究为优化 DFIs 管理提供了重要见解,有助于医生快速决定为每位患者选择合适的抗生素,并降低因不当使用广谱经验疗法而产生细菌耐药性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1