Growth responses to waterlogging stress among cool-season grass species

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Grass and Forage Science Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1111/gfs.12655
Ross C. Braun, Aaron J. Patton
{"title":"Growth responses to waterlogging stress among cool-season grass species","authors":"Ross C. Braun,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban grasslands span climates and topography in soils with variable water infiltration and drainage rates that result in occasional waterlogging stress, while data on grass species tolerance to waterlogging stress is scant. Whole plant responses to waterlogging stress among cool-season grass species were quantified in a controlled environment. The following grasses were grown in well-drained vs. waterlogged soil for 55 d: strong creeping red fescue (<i>Festuca rubra</i> ssp. <i>rubra</i>), slender creeping red fescue (<i>F</i>. <i>rubra</i> ssp. <i>littoralis</i>), Chewings fescue (<i>F</i>. <i>rubra</i> ssp. <i>commutata</i>), hard fescue (<i>F. brevipila</i>), tall fescue (<i>F</i>. <i>arundinacea</i> syn. <i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i>), Kentucky bluegrasses (<i>Poa pratensis</i>), annual bluegrass (<i>P. annua</i>), rough bluegrass (<i>P. trivialis</i>), creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i>), perennial ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i>), and alkaligrass (<i>Puccinellia distans</i>). Five cultivars of each fine fescue (<i>Festuca</i> spp.) taxon were included for comparison. When grown in waterlogged soil compared to well-drained conditions, relative differences generally ranged from −3% to −26% (shoots) and −13% to −33% (roots) for creeping bentgrass, tall fescue, and Kentucky bluegrass indicating higher waterlogging stress tolerance. The relative differences ranged from −18% to −43% in shoots and −3% to −34% in roots for annual bluegrass and perennial ryegrass indicating fair performance under waterlogging stress. Fine fescues, rough bluegrass, and alkaligrass exhibited the poorest performance during waterlogging stress with plant responses ranging from −12% to −64% (shoots) and −17% to −73% (roots). Negative whole plant responses among cultivars of four fine fescue taxa were similar. The selection of grasses tolerant to waterlogging stress will be important in developing resilient landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12655","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban grasslands span climates and topography in soils with variable water infiltration and drainage rates that result in occasional waterlogging stress, while data on grass species tolerance to waterlogging stress is scant. Whole plant responses to waterlogging stress among cool-season grass species were quantified in a controlled environment. The following grasses were grown in well-drained vs. waterlogged soil for 55 d: strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp. rubra), slender creeping red fescue (F. rubra ssp. littoralis), Chewings fescue (F. rubra ssp. commutata), hard fescue (F. brevipila), tall fescue (F. arundinacea syn. Schedonorus arundinaceus), Kentucky bluegrasses (Poa pratensis), annual bluegrass (P. annua), rough bluegrass (P. trivialis), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and alkaligrass (Puccinellia distans). Five cultivars of each fine fescue (Festuca spp.) taxon were included for comparison. When grown in waterlogged soil compared to well-drained conditions, relative differences generally ranged from −3% to −26% (shoots) and −13% to −33% (roots) for creeping bentgrass, tall fescue, and Kentucky bluegrass indicating higher waterlogging stress tolerance. The relative differences ranged from −18% to −43% in shoots and −3% to −34% in roots for annual bluegrass and perennial ryegrass indicating fair performance under waterlogging stress. Fine fescues, rough bluegrass, and alkaligrass exhibited the poorest performance during waterlogging stress with plant responses ranging from −12% to −64% (shoots) and −17% to −73% (roots). Negative whole plant responses among cultivars of four fine fescue taxa were similar. The selection of grasses tolerant to waterlogging stress will be important in developing resilient landscapes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷季型草种对水涝胁迫的生长反应
城市草地的气候和地形跨度很大,土壤的渗水和排水率各不相同,因此偶尔会出现涝害胁迫,而草种对涝害胁迫耐受性的数据却很少。我们在受控环境中量化了冷季型草种对水涝胁迫的整株反应。以下草种在排水良好的土壤和渍水土壤中分别生长了 55 天:强匍匐红羊茅(Festuca rubra ssp. rubra)、纤细匍匐红羊茅(F. rubra ssp. littoralis)、嚼翼羊茅(F. rubra ssp. commutata)、硬羊茅(F. brevipila)、高羊茅(F. arundinacea syn.arundinacea syn. Schedonorus arundinaceus)、肯塔基蓝草(Poa pratensis)、一年生蓝草(P. annua)、粗蓝草(P. trivialis)、匍匐翦股颖(Agrostis stolonifera)、多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)和碱草(Puccinellia distans)。每个细羊茅(Festuca spp.)与排水良好的土壤条件相比,匍匐翦股颖、高羊茅和肯塔基蓝草在涝害土壤中生长时的相对差异一般在-3%至-26%(芽)和-13%至-33%(根)之间,这表明它们对涝害胁迫的耐受力较强。一年生蓝草和多年生黑麦草的嫩枝和根的相对差异分别为-18%至-43%和-3%至-34%,表明它们在涝害胁迫下的表现一般。细羊茅、粗蓝草和碱草在涝害胁迫下的表现最差,植物反应在-12%到-64%(芽)和-17%到-73%(根)之间。四种细羊茅类群的栽培品种的整株负反应相似。选择耐受水涝胁迫的禾本科植物对开发具有抗逆性的景观非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
期刊最新文献
Species dynamics in forage seed mixtures exposed to different lengths of growing season Annual and seasonal dry matter production, botanical species composition, and nutritive value of multispecies, permanent pasture, and perennial ryegrass swards managed under grazing Marandu palisade grass‐forage peanut mixed pastures: Forage intake, animal behaviour, and canopy structure as affected by grazing intensities Does the inclusion of crop and forestry components in forage‐based systems affect the ruminal fermentation and methane production of Marandu palisadegrass? Predictive modelling of chlorophyll in Mombaça grass leaves by hyperspectral reflectance data and machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1