Shark and odontocete depredation on the catch of the tuna longline fishery in New Caledonia (South Pacific Ocean)

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES ICES Journal of Marine Science Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1093/icesjms/fsae014
Margaux Mollier, Camille Mazé, François Prioul, Paul Hamer, Malo Hosken, Sam McKechnie, Paul Tixier
{"title":"Shark and odontocete depredation on the catch of the tuna longline fishery in New Caledonia (South Pacific Ocean)","authors":"Margaux Mollier, Camille Mazé, François Prioul, Paul Hamer, Malo Hosken, Sam McKechnie, Paul Tixier","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large marine predators feeding on fish caught on fishing gear, referred to as ‘depredation’, occur in a wide range of fisheries worldwide. Depredation can result in negative ecological and socio-economic impacts, leading to conflict between fishers and depredating species. However, depredation remains understudied in many fisheries, and this hampers the development of effective mitigation solutions. In this study, 21 years of fishing data (2002–2022) were used to assess shark and odontocete depredation in the pelagic tuna longline fishery of New Caledonia. Using generalized linear models, the year, season, effort, soaking time, and vessel were identified as variables significantly influencing the probability of depredation to occur. Results showed that while shark depredation occurred more frequently than odontocete depredation (58.5% vs. 9.2% of the longline sets), they damaged a lower proportion of fish (3.9% vs. 12.3%) over the study period. Unlike sharks, odontocetes selectively depredate tuna, with their highest occurrence during periods of high tuna catch rates, suggesting a co-occurrence with fishing activities. Together, these results indicate that depredation in the New Caledonian fishery is high compared to other regions and provide essential information on the dynamics and impacts of the issue as a basis for considering management and mitigation options.","PeriodicalId":51072,"journal":{"name":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large marine predators feeding on fish caught on fishing gear, referred to as ‘depredation’, occur in a wide range of fisheries worldwide. Depredation can result in negative ecological and socio-economic impacts, leading to conflict between fishers and depredating species. However, depredation remains understudied in many fisheries, and this hampers the development of effective mitigation solutions. In this study, 21 years of fishing data (2002–2022) were used to assess shark and odontocete depredation in the pelagic tuna longline fishery of New Caledonia. Using generalized linear models, the year, season, effort, soaking time, and vessel were identified as variables significantly influencing the probability of depredation to occur. Results showed that while shark depredation occurred more frequently than odontocete depredation (58.5% vs. 9.2% of the longline sets), they damaged a lower proportion of fish (3.9% vs. 12.3%) over the study period. Unlike sharks, odontocetes selectively depredate tuna, with their highest occurrence during periods of high tuna catch rates, suggesting a co-occurrence with fishing activities. Together, these results indicate that depredation in the New Caledonian fishery is high compared to other regions and provide essential information on the dynamics and impacts of the issue as a basis for considering management and mitigation options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新喀里多尼亚(南太平洋)金枪鱼延绳钓渔业渔获物上的鲨鱼和齿鲸掠食物
以渔具捕获的鱼为食的大型海洋掠食者被称为 "掠食",发生在世界各地的渔业中。掠食会对生态和社会经济造成负面影响,导致渔民与掠食物种之间的冲突。然而,在许多渔业中,对捕食行为的研究仍然不足,这阻碍了有效缓解方案的开发。本研究利用 21 年的捕捞数据(2002-2022 年)评估了新喀里多尼亚中上层金枪鱼延绳钓渔业中鲨鱼和齿鲸的捕食情况。利用广义线性模型,确定了年份、季节、努力量、浸泡时间和渔船等变量对发生捕食的概率有显著影响。研究结果表明,在研究期间,虽然鲨鱼的捕食发生率(58.5% 对 9.2%)高于齿鲸的捕食发生率(58.5% 对 9.2%),但它们破坏鱼类的比例较低(3.9% 对 12.3%)。与鲨鱼不同的是,齿鲸会选择性地捕食金枪鱼,在金枪鱼捕获率高的时期发生率最高,这表明齿鲸的捕食与捕捞活动同时发生。总之,这些结果表明,与其他地区相比,新喀里多尼亚渔业中的掠食率很高,并提供了有关该问题的动态和影响的重要信息,作为考虑管理和缓解方案的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ICES Journal of Marine Science
ICES Journal of Marine Science 农林科学-海洋学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The ICES Journal of Marine Science publishes original articles, opinion essays (“Food for Thought”), visions for the future (“Quo Vadimus”), and critical reviews that contribute to our scientific understanding of marine systems and the impact of human activities on them. The Journal also serves as a foundation for scientific advice across the broad spectrum of management and conservation issues related to the marine environment. Oceanography (e.g. productivity-determining processes), marine habitats, living resources, and related topics constitute the key elements of papers considered for publication. This includes economic, social, and public administration studies to the extent that they are directly related to management of the seas and are of general interest to marine scientists. Integrated studies that bridge gaps between traditional disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Adaptive small-scale fisheries in the eastern Cantabrian coast through reliance on essential species A roadmap for generating annual bycatch estimates from sparse at-sea observer data Assessing the value of harmful algal bloom forecasts in the Pacific Northwest Uncrewed surface vehicles (USVs) as platforms for fisheries and plankton acoustics Trophic flows to mesozooplankton support the conventional paradigm of pelagic food web structure in ocean ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1