Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Therapeutic Protocols Using Inflammatory Markers.

Q2 Medicine Acta Informatica Medica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/aim.2023.31.244-248
Naida Omerovic, Tamer Bego, Besim Prnjavorac, Nermina Ziga Smajic, Fahir Becic, Halil Corovic, Selma Skrbo
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Therapeutic Protocols Using Inflammatory Markers.","authors":"Naida Omerovic, Tamer Bego, Besim Prnjavorac, Nermina Ziga Smajic, Fahir Becic, Halil Corovic, Selma Skrbo","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.244-248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathophysiology and therapy of <b>coronavirus disease-19 (</b>COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), are a dilemma for scientists and health professionals, and the fact that patients show different symptoms and severity of the clinical picture also contributes to that.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic protocols (the use of immunomodulators) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients of various severity of the clinical picture by monitoring inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP), as well as the impact of the type and number of comorbidities patients had on these markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 patients with a mild (n=76), moderate (n=70) or severe (n=54) clinical picture was included. Inflammatory markers [ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), CRP (C-reactive protein)] were examined on three occasions: twice during hospitalization and once after hospital discharge. Immunomodulators used intrahospital were corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone + dexamethasone), tocilizumab or metenkefalin/tridecactide. Posthospital, patients were taking either methylprednisolone or did not use any immunomodulators. For statistical analysis, SPSS 26.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019 were used, with a level of significance of α=0.05. Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank) were applied and effect size (ES) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three corticosteroid therapies used intrahospital caused a significant decrease in both inflammatory markers, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture, but the ES was the biggest with methylprednisolone + dexamethasone, then dexamethasone, and lastly methylprednisolone. Posthospital, methylprednisolone caused a significant decrease in both inflammatory markers, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture. The most common comorbidity in all patients, as well as in patients with a severe clinical picture, was hypertension. There was no statistically significant impact of the number of comorbidities patients had on ESR and CRP, but the highest number of comorbidities was in patients with a severe clinical picture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of immunomodulators, especially methylprednisolone + dexamethasone intrahospital and methylprednisolone posthospital, is justified in most COVID-19 cases as there is a significant correlation between this disease's pathophysiology and the immune response. There is also a positive correlation between the number of comorbidities patients have and the severity of the clinical picture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.244-248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pathophysiology and therapy of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), are a dilemma for scientists and health professionals, and the fact that patients show different symptoms and severity of the clinical picture also contributes to that.

Objective: This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic protocols (the use of immunomodulators) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients of various severity of the clinical picture by monitoring inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP), as well as the impact of the type and number of comorbidities patients had on these markers.

Methods: A total of 200 patients with a mild (n=76), moderate (n=70) or severe (n=54) clinical picture was included. Inflammatory markers [ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), CRP (C-reactive protein)] were examined on three occasions: twice during hospitalization and once after hospital discharge. Immunomodulators used intrahospital were corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone + dexamethasone), tocilizumab or metenkefalin/tridecactide. Posthospital, patients were taking either methylprednisolone or did not use any immunomodulators. For statistical analysis, SPSS 26.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019 were used, with a level of significance of α=0.05. Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank) were applied and effect size (ES) was calculated.

Results: Three corticosteroid therapies used intrahospital caused a significant decrease in both inflammatory markers, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture, but the ES was the biggest with methylprednisolone + dexamethasone, then dexamethasone, and lastly methylprednisolone. Posthospital, methylprednisolone caused a significant decrease in both inflammatory markers, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture. The most common comorbidity in all patients, as well as in patients with a severe clinical picture, was hypertension. There was no statistically significant impact of the number of comorbidities patients had on ESR and CRP, but the highest number of comorbidities was in patients with a severe clinical picture.

Conclusion: The use of immunomodulators, especially methylprednisolone + dexamethasone intrahospital and methylprednisolone posthospital, is justified in most COVID-19 cases as there is a significant correlation between this disease's pathophysiology and the immune response. There is also a positive correlation between the number of comorbidities patients have and the severity of the clinical picture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用炎症标志物评估冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 治疗方案的效果。
背景:由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)的病理生理学和治疗是科学家和卫生专业人员面临的一个难题:本文旨在通过监测炎症指标(血沉和 CRP),评估治疗方案(使用免疫调节剂)对不同临床症状严重程度的 COVID-19 患者的治疗效果,以及患者合并症的类型和数量对这些指标的影响:共纳入 200 名临床症状为轻度(76 人)、中度(70 人)或重度(54 人)的患者。对炎症指标[ESR(红细胞沉降率)、CRP(C反应蛋白)]进行了三次检查:两次在住院期间,一次在出院后。院内使用的免疫调节剂包括皮质类固醇(甲基强的松龙、地塞米松、甲基强的松龙+地塞米松)、妥西珠单抗或甲氰咪胍/曲克奈德。出院后,患者要么服用甲基强的松龙,要么不使用任何免疫调节剂。统计分析采用 SPSS 26.0 和 Microsoft Excel 2019,显著性水平为 α=0.05。采用非参数检验(Kruskal-Wallis 和 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank)并计算效应大小(ES):院内使用的三种皮质类固醇疗法均能显著降低两种炎症指标,尤其是在临床症状严重的患者中,但甲泼尼龙+地塞米松的ES最大,然后是地塞米松,最后是甲泼尼龙。入院后,甲基强的松龙可显著降低两种炎症指标,尤其是在临床症状严重的患者中。在所有患者以及临床症状严重的患者中,最常见的合并症是高血压。患者的合并症数量对 ESR 和 CRP 没有明显的统计学影响,但合并症数量最多的是临床症状严重的患者:结论:在大多数 COVID-19 病例中,使用免疫调节剂,尤其是院内使用甲基强的松龙+地塞米松和院后使用甲基强的松龙是合理的,因为这种疾病的病理生理学与免疫反应之间存在显著的相关性。患者合并症的数量与临床症状的严重程度也呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Carotid Stenosis and Pulsatile Index Measured by Transcranial Doppler. Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes. Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants. How Far Goes the Un-ethic of the Authors Who Submit the Articles to the Journals, Or, Better to Say, Their "Scientific Insolence"? Significance of Detecting Antierythrocyte Antibodies in Pretransfusion Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1