Improving image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy in lower extremity CT angiography using a split-bolus contrast injection protocol.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae036
Qian Tian, Shumeng Zhu, Yannan Cheng, Jianying Li, Tingting Qu, Xiaoqian Jia, Le Cao, Lihong Chen, Jianxin Guo
{"title":"Improving image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy in lower extremity CT angiography using a split-bolus contrast injection protocol.","authors":"Qian Tian, Shumeng Zhu, Yannan Cheng, Jianying Li, Tingting Qu, Xiaoqian Jia, Le Cao, Lihong Chen, Jianxin Guo","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical value of using a split-bolus contrast injection protocol in improving image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy in lower extremity CT angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty (mean age, 66 ± 12 years) and 39 (mean age, 66 ± 11 years) patients underwent CTA in the lower extremity arteries using split-bolus and fixed-bolus injection schemes, respectively. The objective and subjective image quality of the 2 groups were compared and the diagnostic efficacy for the degree of vessel stenosis was compared using digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the fixed-bolus scheme, the split-bolus scheme greatly improved the consistency of image quality of the low extremities by significantly increasing the arterial enhancement (337.87 ± 64.67HU vs. 254.74 ± 71.58HU, P < .001), signal-to-noise ratio (22.58 ± 11.64 vs. 7.14 ± 1.98, P < .001), and contrast-to-noise ratio (37.21 ± 10.46 vs. 31.10 ± 15.40, P = .041) in the infrapopliteal segment. The subjective image quality was better (P < .001) and the diagnostic accuracy was higher in the split-bolus group than in the fixed-bolus group (96.00% vs. 91.67%, P < .05, for diagnosing >50% stenosis, and 97.00% vs. 89.10%, P < .05, for diagnosing occlusion) for the infrapopliteal segment arteries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the fixed-bolus injection scheme, the split-bolus injection scheme improves the image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy especially for the infrapopliteal segment arteries in lower extremity CTA.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>(1) The split-bolus injection scheme of CTA of the lower extremity arteries improves the overall image quality, uniformity of contrast enhancement. (2) Compared with the fixed-bolus injection scheme, the split-bolus injection scheme especially improves the infrapopliteal segment arteries image quality and diagnostic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11027256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical value of using a split-bolus contrast injection protocol in improving image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy in lower extremity CT angiography (CTA).

Methods: Fifty (mean age, 66 ± 12 years) and 39 (mean age, 66 ± 11 years) patients underwent CTA in the lower extremity arteries using split-bolus and fixed-bolus injection schemes, respectively. The objective and subjective image quality of the 2 groups were compared and the diagnostic efficacy for the degree of vessel stenosis was compared using digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In comparison with the fixed-bolus scheme, the split-bolus scheme greatly improved the consistency of image quality of the low extremities by significantly increasing the arterial enhancement (337.87 ± 64.67HU vs. 254.74 ± 71.58HU, P < .001), signal-to-noise ratio (22.58 ± 11.64 vs. 7.14 ± 1.98, P < .001), and contrast-to-noise ratio (37.21 ± 10.46 vs. 31.10 ± 15.40, P = .041) in the infrapopliteal segment. The subjective image quality was better (P < .001) and the diagnostic accuracy was higher in the split-bolus group than in the fixed-bolus group (96.00% vs. 91.67%, P < .05, for diagnosing >50% stenosis, and 97.00% vs. 89.10%, P < .05, for diagnosing occlusion) for the infrapopliteal segment arteries.

Conclusions: Compared with the fixed-bolus injection scheme, the split-bolus injection scheme improves the image quality consistency and diagnostic accuracy especially for the infrapopliteal segment arteries in lower extremity CTA.

Advances in knowledge: (1) The split-bolus injection scheme of CTA of the lower extremity arteries improves the overall image quality, uniformity of contrast enhancement. (2) Compared with the fixed-bolus injection scheme, the split-bolus injection scheme especially improves the infrapopliteal segment arteries image quality and diagnostic efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用分次注射对比剂方案提高下肢 CT 血管造影的图像质量一致性和诊断准确性。
目的评估使用分波段对比剂注射方案在改善下肢 CT 血管造影(CTA)图像质量一致性和诊断准确性方面的临床价值:分别对 50 名(平均年龄为 66 ± 12 岁)和 39 名(平均年龄为 66 ± 11 岁)患者进行了下肢动脉 CTA 检查,采用分注和定注两种注射方案。比较了两组患者的客观和主观图像质量,并以 DSA 作为金标准比较了血管狭窄程度的诊断效果。A P 结果:与固定注射方案相比,分次注射方案大大提高了低位肢体图像质量的一致性,显著增加了动脉增强(337.87±64.67HU vs. 254.74±71.58HU,P 50%狭窄,97.00% vs. 89.10%,P 结论:与固定注射方案相比,分次注射方案大大提高了低位肢体图像质量的一致性:与固定胆囊注射方案相比,分胆囊注射方案提高了下肢 CTA 图像质量的一致性和诊断准确性,尤其是对腘下动脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Calculating Optic Nerve Planning Organ at Risk Volume Margins for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Optic Nerve Motion determined using MRI. Paediatric magnetoencephalography and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions. Acceptance and results of cryoablation for the treatment of early breast cancer in non-surgical patients. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1