Digital Medication Management in Polypharmacy.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Deutsches Arzteblatt international Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0007
Robin Brünn, Jale Basten, Dorothea Lemke, Alexandra Piotrowski, Sara Söling, Bastian Surmann, Wolfgang Greiner, Daniel Grandt, Petra Kellermann-Mühlhoff, Sebastian Harder, Paul Glasziou, Rafael Perera, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Peter Ihle, Marjan van den Akker, Nina Timmesfeld, Christiane Muth
{"title":"Digital Medication Management in Polypharmacy.","authors":"Robin Brünn, Jale Basten, Dorothea Lemke, Alexandra Piotrowski, Sara Söling, Bastian Surmann, Wolfgang Greiner, Daniel Grandt, Petra Kellermann-Mühlhoff, Sebastian Harder, Paul Glasziou, Rafael Perera, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Peter Ihle, Marjan van den Akker, Nina Timmesfeld, Christiane Muth","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate drug prescriptions for patients with polypharmacy can have avoidable adverse consequences. We studied the effects of a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) for medication management on hospitalizations and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial involved an open cohort of adult patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices (=clusters) in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. During the period of the intervention, their medication lists were checked annually using the CDSS. The CDSS warns against inappropriate prescriptions on the basis of patient-related health insurance data. The combined primary endpoint consisted of overall mortality and hospitalization for any reason. The secondary endpoints were mortality, hospitalizations, and high-risk prescription. We analyzed the quarterly health insurance data of the intention- to-treat population with a mixed logistic model taking account of clustering and repeated measurements. Sensitivity analyses addressed effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and other effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>688 primary care practices were randomized, and data were obtained on 42 700 patients over 391 994 quarter years. No significant reduction was found in either the primary endpoint (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [0.95; 1.04]; p = 0.8716) or the secondary endpoints (hospitalizations: OR 1.00 [0.95; 1.05]; mortality: OR 1.04 [0.92; 1.17]; high-risk prescription: OR 0.98 [0.92; 1.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The planned analyses did not reveal any significant effect of the intervention. Pandemicadjusted analyses yielded evidence that the mortality of adult patients with polypharmacy might potentially be lowered by the CDSS. Controlled trials with appropriate follow-up are needed to prove that a CDSS has significant effects on mortality in patients with polypharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate drug prescriptions for patients with polypharmacy can have avoidable adverse consequences. We studied the effects of a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) for medication management on hospitalizations and mortality.

Methods: This stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial involved an open cohort of adult patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices (=clusters) in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. During the period of the intervention, their medication lists were checked annually using the CDSS. The CDSS warns against inappropriate prescriptions on the basis of patient-related health insurance data. The combined primary endpoint consisted of overall mortality and hospitalization for any reason. The secondary endpoints were mortality, hospitalizations, and high-risk prescription. We analyzed the quarterly health insurance data of the intention- to-treat population with a mixed logistic model taking account of clustering and repeated measurements. Sensitivity analyses addressed effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and other effects.

Results: 688 primary care practices were randomized, and data were obtained on 42 700 patients over 391 994 quarter years. No significant reduction was found in either the primary endpoint (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [0.95; 1.04]; p = 0.8716) or the secondary endpoints (hospitalizations: OR 1.00 [0.95; 1.05]; mortality: OR 1.04 [0.92; 1.17]; high-risk prescription: OR 0.98 [0.92; 1.04]).

Conclusion: The planned analyses did not reveal any significant effect of the intervention. Pandemicadjusted analyses yielded evidence that the mortality of adult patients with polypharmacy might potentially be lowered by the CDSS. Controlled trials with appropriate follow-up are needed to prove that a CDSS has significant effects on mortality in patients with polypharmacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多药合用中的数字药物管理--一项在初级保健实践中采用阶梯式楔形设计的分组随机对照试验的结果(AdAM)。
背景:对使用多种药物的患者开具不适当的药物处方可能会产生本可避免的不良后果。我们研究了用于药物管理的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)对住院率和死亡率的影响:这项阶梯式、分组随机对照试验的对象是德国威斯特法伦-利佩地区初级医疗机构(=分组)中患有多种药物的成年患者。在干预期间,每年都会使用 CDSS 对患者的用药清单进行检查。CDSS 根据与患者相关的医疗保险数据对不当处方提出警告。综合主要终点包括总死亡率和因各种原因住院率。次要终点是死亡率、住院率和高风险处方。我们采用混合逻辑模型对意向治疗人群的季度健康保险数据进行了分析,其中考虑到了聚类和重复测量。敏感性分析涉及 COVID-19 大流行的影响和其他影响:688 家初级保健机构参与了随机研究,在 391 994 个季度年中获得了 42 700 名患者的数据。无论是主要终点(几率比 [OR] 1.00;95% 置信区间 [0.95;1.04];P = 0.8716)还是次要终点(住院治疗:或次要终点(住院:OR 1.00 [0.95; 1.05];死亡率:OR 1.04 [0.92]):或次要终点(住院:OR 1.00 [0.95; 1.05];死亡率:OR 1.04 [0.92; 1.17];高危处方:结论:结论:计划中的分析并未显示出干预措施的显著效果。大流行调整后的分析表明,CDSS 有可能降低使用多种药物的成年患者的死亡率。要证明 CDSS 对多种药物治疗患者的死亡率有显著影响,还需要进行适当随访的对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
期刊最新文献
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Dengue Fever—Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Interrupted Time Series for Assessing the Causality of Intervention Effects. Part 35 of a Series on Evaluating Scientific Publications. The Incidence and Risk Factors of Persistent Opioid Use After Surgery—a Retrospective Secondary Data Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1