16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the oral and fecal microbiota in colorectal cancer positives versus colorectal cancer negatives in Iranian population.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s13099-024-00604-0
Sama Rezasoltani, Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Seyedesomayeh Jasemi, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, Maria Gazouli, Amir Sadeghi, Shirin Torkashvand, Reyhaneh Baniali, Hartmut Schlüter, Mohammad Reza Zali, Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi
{"title":"16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the oral and fecal microbiota in colorectal cancer positives versus colorectal cancer negatives in Iranian population.","authors":"Sama Rezasoltani, Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Seyedesomayeh Jasemi, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, Maria Gazouli, Amir Sadeghi, Shirin Torkashvand, Reyhaneh Baniali, Hartmut Schlüter, Mohammad Reza Zali, Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi","doi":"10.1186/s13099-024-00604-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant healthcare challenge, accounting for nearly 6.1% of global cancer cases. Early detection, facilitated by population screening utilizing innovative biomarkers, is pivotal for mitigating CRC incidence. This study aims to scrutinize the fecal and salivary microbiomes of CRC-positive individuals (CPs) in comparison to CRC-negative counterparts (CNs) to enhance early CRC diagnosis through microbial biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 80 oral and stool samples were collected from Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, encompassing both CPs and CNs undergoing screening. Microbial profiling was conducted using 16S rRNA sequencing assays, employing the Nextera XT Index Kit on an Illumina NovaSeq platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Distinct microbial profiles were observed in saliva and stool samples of CPs, diverging significantly from those of CNs at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, and species. Saliva samples from CPs exhibited abundance of Calothrix parietina, Granulicatella adiacens, Rothia dentocariosa, and Rothia mucilaginosa, absent in CNs. Additionally, Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae were markedly higher in CPs' feces, while the Fusobacteria phylum was significantly elevated in CPs' saliva. Conversely, the non-pathogenic bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila exhibited a significant decrease in CPs' fecal samples compared to CNs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through meticulous selection of saliva and stool microbes based on Mean Decrease GINI values and employing logistic regression for saliva and support vector machine models for stool, we successfully developed a microbiota test with heightened sensitivity and specificity for early CRC detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12833,"journal":{"name":"Gut Pathogens","volume":"16 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10880352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-024-00604-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant healthcare challenge, accounting for nearly 6.1% of global cancer cases. Early detection, facilitated by population screening utilizing innovative biomarkers, is pivotal for mitigating CRC incidence. This study aims to scrutinize the fecal and salivary microbiomes of CRC-positive individuals (CPs) in comparison to CRC-negative counterparts (CNs) to enhance early CRC diagnosis through microbial biomarkers.

Material and methods: A total of 80 oral and stool samples were collected from Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, encompassing both CPs and CNs undergoing screening. Microbial profiling was conducted using 16S rRNA sequencing assays, employing the Nextera XT Index Kit on an Illumina NovaSeq platform.

Results: Distinct microbial profiles were observed in saliva and stool samples of CPs, diverging significantly from those of CNs at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, and species. Saliva samples from CPs exhibited abundance of Calothrix parietina, Granulicatella adiacens, Rothia dentocariosa, and Rothia mucilaginosa, absent in CNs. Additionally, Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae were markedly higher in CPs' feces, while the Fusobacteria phylum was significantly elevated in CPs' saliva. Conversely, the non-pathogenic bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila exhibited a significant decrease in CPs' fecal samples compared to CNs.

Conclusion: Through meticulous selection of saliva and stool microbes based on Mean Decrease GINI values and employing logistic regression for saliva and support vector machine models for stool, we successfully developed a microbiota test with heightened sensitivity and specificity for early CRC detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对伊朗人群中结直肠癌阳性与结直肠癌阴性患者的口腔和粪便微生物群进行 16S rRNA 测序分析。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是一项重大的医疗挑战,占全球癌症病例的近 6.1%。利用创新生物标志物进行人群筛查,有助于早期发现,这对降低 CRC 发病率至关重要。本研究旨在仔细研究 CRC 阳性个体(CPs)与 CRC 阴性个体(CNs)的粪便和唾液微生物组,通过微生物生物标志物提高 CRC 的早期诊断率:从伊朗德黑兰沙希德-贝赫什提医科大学 Taleghani 医院共收集了 80 份口腔和粪便样本,其中包括接受筛查的 CPs 和 CNs。在 Illumina NovaSeq 平台上使用 Nextera XT 指数试剂盒,利用 16S rRNA 测序分析法进行了微生物谱分析:结果:在氯化石蜡患者的唾液和粪便样本中观察到了不同的微生物特征,与氯化石蜡患者的唾液和粪便样本在不同的分类水平(包括门、科和种)上存在显著差异。氯化石蜡患者的唾液样本中含有大量的Calothrix parietina、Granulicatella adiacens、Rothia dentocariosa和Rothia mucilaginosa,而氯化石蜡患者的唾液样本中没有这些微生物。此外,氯化石蜡粪便中的Lachnospiraceae和Prevotellaceae明显较多,而氯化石蜡唾液中的Fusobacteria门明显较多。相反,CP 粪便样本中的非致病菌 Akkermansia muciniphila 与 CN 相比明显减少:通过根据平均下降 GINI 值对唾液和粪便微生物进行精心筛选,并对唾液采用逻辑回归法,对粪便采用支持向量机模型,我们成功开发出了一种微生物群检测方法,其灵敏度和特异性均有所提高,可用于早期 CRC 检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gut Pathogens
Gut Pathogens GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Gut Pathogens is a fast publishing, inclusive and prominent international journal which recognizes the need for a publishing platform uniquely tailored to reflect the full breadth of research in the biology and medicine of pathogens, commensals and functional microbiota of the gut. The journal publishes basic, clinical and cutting-edge research on all aspects of the above mentioned organisms including probiotic bacteria and yeasts and their products. The scope also covers the related ecology, molecular genetics, physiology and epidemiology of these microbes. The journal actively invites timely reports on the novel aspects of genomics, metagenomics, microbiota profiling and systems biology. Gut Pathogens will also consider, at the discretion of the editors, descriptive studies identifying a new genome sequence of a gut microbe or a series of related microbes (such as those obtained from new hosts, niches, settings, outbreaks and epidemics) and those obtained from single or multiple hosts at one or different time points (chronological evolution).
期刊最新文献
Clonal and horizontal transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales strains and genes via flies. Genomic characterisation of an extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate assigned to a novel sequence type (6914). Occurrence and assemblage distribution of Giardia Duodenalis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in southeastern Iran (2019-2022). A triad of gut dysbiosis, dysregulated immunity, and 'leaky' gut characterize HCMV associated neonatal cholestasis. Venous intestinal ischemia of fungal origin as a cause of intestinal obstruction in immunocompromised patients: case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1