Transvaginal Sonography for the Preoperative Assessment of Parametrial Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1159/000535940
Simone Garzon, Antonio Simone Laganà, Stefano Guerriero, Juan Luis Alcázar, Susan Dababou, Stefano Uccella, Marco Scioscia
{"title":"Transvaginal Sonography for the Preoperative Assessment of Parametrial Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.","authors":"Simone Garzon, Antonio Simone Laganà, Stefano Guerriero, Juan Luis Alcázar, Susan Dababou, Stefano Uccella, Marco Scioscia","doi":"10.1159/000535940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for parametria endometriosis (PE) of transvaginal sonography (TVS) performed following a systematic approach for the assessment of the lateral parametria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A diagnostic accuracy study was employed based on a prospective observational design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis between January 2016 and December 2020 were considered.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at endometriosis referral hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected clinical, imaging, and surgical data of all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis between January 2016 and December 2020. A standardized technique with a systematic approach for the assessment of the lateral parametria following specific anatomic landmarks was used for the TVS. The diagnostic accuracy for PE in TVS was assessed using the intraoperative and pathologic diagnosis of PE as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 476 patients who underwent surgery, PE was identified in 114 out of 476 patients (23.95%): 91 left and 54 right PE out of 476 surgical procedures were identified (19.12% vs. 11.34%; p = 0.001); bilateral involvement in 27.19% (31/114 patients) cases. The sensitivity of TVS for PE was 90.74% (79.70-96.92%, 95% CI) for the right side and 87.91% (79.40-93.81%, 95% CI) for the left side. The specificity was almost identical for both sides (98.58% vs. 98.18%). For the right parametrium, the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 63.82 (28.70-141.90, 95% CI) and 0.09 (0.04-0.22, 95% CI), respectively. On the left parametrium, the PLR and NLR were 48.35 (23.12-101.4, 95% CI) and 0.12 (0.07-0.21, 95% CI), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for right and left PE was 97.69% (95.90-98.84%, 95% CI) and 96.22% (94.04-97.74%, 95% CI), respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The principal limit is the high dependence of TVS on the operator experience. Therefore, although a standardized approach following precise definitions of anatomical landmarks was used, we cannot conclude that the observed accuracy of TVS for PE is the same for all sonographers. In this regard, the learning curve was not assessed. In the case of negative TVS for parametrial involvement with an absent intraoperative suspect, a complete dissection of the parametrium was not performed to avoid surgical complications; therefore, cases of minor PE may be missed, underestimating false negatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TVS performed following a systematic approach for assessing the lateral parametria seems to have good diagnostic accuracy for PE with large changes in the posttest probability of parametrial involvement based on the TVS evaluation. Considering the clinical and surgical implications of PE, further studies implementing a standardized approach for assessing the parametrium by TVS are recommended to confirm our observations and implement a standardized protocol in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for parametria endometriosis (PE) of transvaginal sonography (TVS) performed following a systematic approach for the assessment of the lateral parametria.

Design: A diagnostic accuracy study was employed based on a prospective observational design.

Participants: All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis between January 2016 and December 2020 were considered.

Setting: The study was conducted at endometriosis referral hospitals.

Methods: We prospectively collected clinical, imaging, and surgical data of all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis between January 2016 and December 2020. A standardized technique with a systematic approach for the assessment of the lateral parametria following specific anatomic landmarks was used for the TVS. The diagnostic accuracy for PE in TVS was assessed using the intraoperative and pathologic diagnosis of PE as the gold standard.

Results: In 476 patients who underwent surgery, PE was identified in 114 out of 476 patients (23.95%): 91 left and 54 right PE out of 476 surgical procedures were identified (19.12% vs. 11.34%; p = 0.001); bilateral involvement in 27.19% (31/114 patients) cases. The sensitivity of TVS for PE was 90.74% (79.70-96.92%, 95% CI) for the right side and 87.91% (79.40-93.81%, 95% CI) for the left side. The specificity was almost identical for both sides (98.58% vs. 98.18%). For the right parametrium, the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 63.82 (28.70-141.90, 95% CI) and 0.09 (0.04-0.22, 95% CI), respectively. On the left parametrium, the PLR and NLR were 48.35 (23.12-101.4, 95% CI) and 0.12 (0.07-0.21, 95% CI), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for right and left PE was 97.69% (95.90-98.84%, 95% CI) and 96.22% (94.04-97.74%, 95% CI), respectively.

Limitations: The principal limit is the high dependence of TVS on the operator experience. Therefore, although a standardized approach following precise definitions of anatomical landmarks was used, we cannot conclude that the observed accuracy of TVS for PE is the same for all sonographers. In this regard, the learning curve was not assessed. In the case of negative TVS for parametrial involvement with an absent intraoperative suspect, a complete dissection of the parametrium was not performed to avoid surgical complications; therefore, cases of minor PE may be missed, underestimating false negatives.

Conclusions: TVS performed following a systematic approach for assessing the lateral parametria seems to have good diagnostic accuracy for PE with large changes in the posttest probability of parametrial involvement based on the TVS evaluation. Considering the clinical and surgical implications of PE, further studies implementing a standardized approach for assessing the parametrium by TVS are recommended to confirm our observations and implement a standardized protocol in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经阴道超声术前评估宫旁深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症:诊断准确性研究。
目的评估经阴道超声检查(TVS)对子宫旁子宫内膜异位症(PE)的诊断准确性:设计:基于前瞻性观察设计的诊断准确性研究 参与者:所有接受腹腔镜手术的连续患者:2016年1月至2020年12月期间接受腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症手术的所有连续患者:子宫内膜异位症转诊医院:我们前瞻性地收集了2016年1月至2020年12月期间所有连续接受腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜异位症患者的临床、影像学和手术数据。TVS 采用标准化技术,按照特定的解剖标志对侧宫旁进行系统评估。以术中和病理诊断为金标准,评估了TVS对PE的诊断准确性:在接受手术的 476 例患者中,有 114 例(23.95%)被确诊为 PE:476 例手术中有 91 例左侧和 54 例右侧 PE(19.12% 对 11.34%;P=0.001);27.19%(31/114 例患者)的病例为双侧受累。右侧 PE 的 TVS 敏感性为 90.74%(79.70%-96.92%,95% CI),左侧为 87.91%(79.40%-93.81%,95% CI)。两侧的特异性几乎相同(98.58% 对 98.18%)。右侧宫旁的阳性似然比(PLR)和阴性似然比(NLR)分别为 63.82(28.70-141.90,95% CI)和 0.09(0.04-0.22,95% CI)。左侧宫旁的 PLR 和 NLR 分别为 48.35(23.12-101.4,95% CI)和 0.12(0.07-0.21,95% CI)。右侧和左侧 PE 的诊断准确率分别为 97.69%(95.90%-98.84%,95%CI)和 96.22%(94.04%-97.74%,95%CI):主要局限是 TVS 高度依赖于操作者的经验。因此,虽然采用了精确定义解剖标志的标准化方法,但我们不能断定所有超声技师观察到的 TVS 检测 PE 的准确性都是一样的。在这方面,我们没有对学习曲线进行评估。在宫旁受累 TVS 阴性且术中无可疑病例的情况下,为避免手术并发症,未对宫旁进行完全解剖;因此,可能会漏诊轻微 PE 病例,从而低估了假阴性率:结论:根据评估侧宫旁的系统方法进行 TVS 似乎对 PE 有很好的诊断准确性,根据 TVS 评估,宫旁受累的试验后概率会有很大变化。考虑到 PE 的临床和手术意义,建议进一步研究通过 TVS 评估宫旁的标准化方法,以证实我们的观察结果,并在临床实践中实施标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Statement. The prevalence of occult malignancy in women undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy for benign indications and the impact of morcellation on survival outcomes: a meta-analysis. Clinical and Ultrasound Features of Normocyclic Non-Hyperandrogenic Adolescents in Early Gynecological Life. Pain level and analgesic requirements in patients who underwent vaginal pelvic floor surgery following general or spinal anesthesia. Validated questionnaires for the assessment of Italian patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1