High Probability of Gene-Drug Interactions Associated with Medication Side Effects in Adolescent Depression: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacogenetic Testing.
Sara Nooraeen, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Julia Shekunov, Scott S Orth, Magdalena Romanowicz, Mark A Frye, Jennifer L Vande Voort
{"title":"High Probability of Gene-Drug Interactions Associated with Medication Side Effects in Adolescent Depression: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacogenetic Testing.","authors":"Sara Nooraeen, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Julia Shekunov, Scott S Orth, Magdalena Romanowicz, Mark A Frye, Jennifer L Vande Voort","doi":"10.1089/cap.2023.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing panels are widely available in clinical practice and often separate medications into columns/bins associated with low, medium, or high probability of gene-drug interactions. The objective of the Adolescent Management of Depression (AMOD) study was to determine the clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing in a double-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study by comparing patients who had genetic testing results at time of medication initiation to those that did not have results until week 8. The objective of this <i>post hoc</i> analysis was to assess and report additional outcomes with respect to significant gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication in the high probability gene-drug interaction bin as defined by a proprietary algorithm) compared with patients taking a medication with minimal to moderate gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication from the low or medium probability gene-drug interaction bin, respectively). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adolescents 13-18 years (<i>N</i> = 170) with moderate to severe major depressive disorder received pharmacogenetic testing. Symptom improvement and side effects were assessed at baseline, week 4, week 8, and 6 months. Patients were grouped into three categories based on whether the medication they were prescribed was associated with low, medium, or high risk for gene-drug interactions. Patients taking a medication from the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin were compared with patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin were more likely to endorse side effects compared with patients taking a medication in the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin at week 8 (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and 6 months (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Depressive symptom severity scores did not differ significantly across the medication bins. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study demonstrates the utility of gene-drug interaction testing to guide medication decisions to minimize side effect burden rather than solely prioritizing the search for the most efficacious medication. (Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02286440).</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":"34 1","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2023.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing panels are widely available in clinical practice and often separate medications into columns/bins associated with low, medium, or high probability of gene-drug interactions. The objective of the Adolescent Management of Depression (AMOD) study was to determine the clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing in a double-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study by comparing patients who had genetic testing results at time of medication initiation to those that did not have results until week 8. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess and report additional outcomes with respect to significant gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication in the high probability gene-drug interaction bin as defined by a proprietary algorithm) compared with patients taking a medication with minimal to moderate gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication from the low or medium probability gene-drug interaction bin, respectively). Methods: Adolescents 13-18 years (N = 170) with moderate to severe major depressive disorder received pharmacogenetic testing. Symptom improvement and side effects were assessed at baseline, week 4, week 8, and 6 months. Patients were grouped into three categories based on whether the medication they were prescribed was associated with low, medium, or high risk for gene-drug interactions. Patients taking a medication from the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin were compared with patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin. Results: Patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin were more likely to endorse side effects compared with patients taking a medication in the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin at week 8 (p = 0.001) and 6 months (p < 0.0001). Depressive symptom severity scores did not differ significantly across the medication bins. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of gene-drug interaction testing to guide medication decisions to minimize side effect burden rather than solely prioritizing the search for the most efficacious medication. (Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02286440).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes:
New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics
New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders
Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.