Does the Level and Complexity of Femur Fracture Determine Intramedullary Peak Pressures During Reamed Femoral Nailing? A Prospective Study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002786
J Kotze, G McCollum, C Breedt, Nicholas Anthony Kruger
{"title":"Does the Level and Complexity of Femur Fracture Determine Intramedullary Peak Pressures During Reamed Femoral Nailing? A Prospective Study.","authors":"J Kotze, G McCollum, C Breedt, Nicholas Anthony Kruger","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate femoral intramedullary (IM) pressures during reamed antegrade nailing and to determine whether fracture level and/or complexity affect peak pressures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients presenting with femur fractures (OTA/AO 31A3; 32A; 32B; 32C; 33A2; 33A3), requiring antegrade IM nail fixation, were included in this study. Excluded were minors and patients presenting with hemodynamic instability, a reduced level of consciousness and intoxication. Femurs were divided into thirds based on preoperative radiological measurements and allocated to 3 groups based on fracture location: Proximal (A), middle (B), and distal (C) third femur fractures. Fracture complexity was also documented.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Peak IM pressures of proximal, middle, and distal third femoral fractures were compared during antegrade femoral IM nail fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two fractures in 21 patients were enrolled and treated over a 4-month period with a distribution of fracture locations of group A = 12, group B = 6, and group C = 4. Measured mean resting distal IM pressures were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) in proximal fractures (group A: 52.5 mm Hg) than in middle and distal third fractures (group B: 36.6 mm Hg and group C: 27.5 mm Hg). Greatest peak pressures were generated during the first ream in groups A and B, occurring distal to the fracture in all cases. Group A averaged 363.8 mm Hg (300-420), group B 174.2 mm Hg (160-200), and group C 98.8 mm Hg (90-100). There was a significant difference comparing group A with B and C combined ( P < 0.01) and group A with B ( P < 0.05) and C ( P < 0.05]) individually. Group A consisted of 6 comminuted and 6 simple fracture configurations. Mean peak pressures in these subgroups differed significantly: 329 mm Hg (300-370) versus 398 mm Hg (370-430), respectively ( P < 0.05). Complex fractures in study groups B and C did not have significantly different peak pressures compared with simple fractures ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the fracture location and comminution affect peak IM pressures during reamed antegrade femoral nailing. Proximal, simple fracture configurations resulted in significantly higher pressures when compared with more distal and comminuted fracture configurations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate femoral intramedullary (IM) pressures during reamed antegrade nailing and to determine whether fracture level and/or complexity affect peak pressures.

Methods:

Design: Prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort.

Setting: Single level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients presenting with femur fractures (OTA/AO 31A3; 32A; 32B; 32C; 33A2; 33A3), requiring antegrade IM nail fixation, were included in this study. Excluded were minors and patients presenting with hemodynamic instability, a reduced level of consciousness and intoxication. Femurs were divided into thirds based on preoperative radiological measurements and allocated to 3 groups based on fracture location: Proximal (A), middle (B), and distal (C) third femur fractures. Fracture complexity was also documented.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Peak IM pressures of proximal, middle, and distal third femoral fractures were compared during antegrade femoral IM nail fixation.

Results: Twenty-two fractures in 21 patients were enrolled and treated over a 4-month period with a distribution of fracture locations of group A = 12, group B = 6, and group C = 4. Measured mean resting distal IM pressures were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) in proximal fractures (group A: 52.5 mm Hg) than in middle and distal third fractures (group B: 36.6 mm Hg and group C: 27.5 mm Hg). Greatest peak pressures were generated during the first ream in groups A and B, occurring distal to the fracture in all cases. Group A averaged 363.8 mm Hg (300-420), group B 174.2 mm Hg (160-200), and group C 98.8 mm Hg (90-100). There was a significant difference comparing group A with B and C combined ( P < 0.01) and group A with B ( P < 0.05) and C ( P < 0.05]) individually. Group A consisted of 6 comminuted and 6 simple fracture configurations. Mean peak pressures in these subgroups differed significantly: 329 mm Hg (300-370) versus 398 mm Hg (370-430), respectively ( P < 0.05). Complex fractures in study groups B and C did not have significantly different peak pressures compared with simple fractures ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Both the fracture location and comminution affect peak IM pressures during reamed antegrade femoral nailing. Proximal, simple fracture configurations resulted in significantly higher pressures when compared with more distal and comminuted fracture configurations.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨骨折的程度和类型会决定股骨再植钉的髓内峰值压力吗?一项前瞻性研究。
目的调查再植前行钉过程中的股骨髓内压,并确定骨折程度和/或复杂程度是否会影响峰值压力:方法:设计:前瞻性、非随机观察队列:患者选择标准:包括股骨骨折(OTA/AO 31A3;32A;32B;32C;33A2;33A3),需要髓内钉前向固定的患者。未成年人和血流动力学不稳定、意识减退和中毒的患者除外。根据术前放射学测量结果将股骨分为三等分,并按骨折位置分为三组:股骨近端(A)、中部(B)和远端(C)骨折。骨折复杂程度也记录在案:结果:比较了股骨IM钉前向固定过程中股骨近端、中部和远端第三骨折的髓内压峰值:21名患者的22处骨折接受了为期4个月的治疗,骨折位置分布为A组=12处;B组=6处;C组=4处。近端骨折(A 组:52.5 mmHg)的平均静息远端 IM 压力明显高于中段和远端三分之一骨折(B 组:36.6 mmHg,C 组:27.5 mmHg)[p < 0.05]。A 组平均为 363.8 mmHg(300-420),B 组为 174.2 mmHg(160-200),C 组为 98.8 mmHg(90-100)。A 组与 B 组和 C 组相比有明显差异[P 0.05]:结论:骨折位置和粉碎程度都会影响股骨前路扩孔钉的髓内压峰值。近端、简单骨折结构导致的压力明显高于远端和粉碎性骨折结构:证据级别:治疗 II 级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery Is Associated with Increased Post-operative Emergency Department Visits. Lower Extremity Trauma is Associated With an Increased Rate of New Mental Disorder Diagnosis and Suicide Attempt. The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study. Heritable Thrombophilia and Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis After Pelvis or Acetabulum Fracture. Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1