Suicide Crisis Inventory-2: factor structure, internal consistency, and validity in a Brazilian sample.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3366
Jefté Peper-Nascimento, Megan L Rogers, Jenelle A Richards, Alexandre Paim Diaz, Luciane B Ceretta, Gabriela S Keller, João Quevedo, Igor Galynker, Samira S Valvassori
{"title":"Suicide Crisis Inventory-2: factor structure, internal consistency, and validity in a Brazilian sample.","authors":"Jefté Peper-Nascimento, Megan L Rogers, Jenelle A Richards, Alexandre Paim Diaz, Luciane B Ceretta, Gabriela S Keller, João Quevedo, Igor Galynker, Samira S Valvassori","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) among Brazilian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SCI-2 was cross-culturally adapted into Portuguese and administered to 2,265 Brazilian participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity by using measures such as suicidal narratives, stressful life events, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The revised one-factor model of the SCI-2 demonstrated an adequate, although not optimal, model fit (?2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < 0.001, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.09, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.05). The revised five-factor model, on the other hand, demonstrated good fit (?2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < 0.001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04). Comparison of these two models indicated that the five-factor model had a better fit than the one-factor model. Both the total and subscale scores of the SCI-2 showed strong internal consistency and good convergent and criterion validity in relation to stressful life events, suicidal narratives (excluding the goal disengagement subscale), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that the Brazilian version of the SCI-2 is a valid tool for assessing symptoms of suicidal crisis syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20233366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) among Brazilian adults.

Methods: The SCI-2 was cross-culturally adapted into Portuguese and administered to 2,265 Brazilian participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity by using measures such as suicidal narratives, stressful life events, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.

Results: The revised one-factor model of the SCI-2 demonstrated an adequate, although not optimal, model fit (?2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < 0.001, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.09, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.05). The revised five-factor model, on the other hand, demonstrated good fit (?2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < 0.001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04). Comparison of these two models indicated that the five-factor model had a better fit than the one-factor model. Both the total and subscale scores of the SCI-2 showed strong internal consistency and good convergent and criterion validity in relation to stressful life events, suicidal narratives (excluding the goal disengagement subscale), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the Brazilian version of the SCI-2 is a valid tool for assessing symptoms of suicidal crisis syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订版自杀危机量表(SCI-2):巴西样本中的因子结构、内部一致性和有效性。
目的:研究巴西成年人自杀危机量表(SCI-2)的因子结构、可靠性和有效性:研究巴西成年人自杀危机量表(SCI-2)巴西版的因子结构、可靠性和有效性:将 SCI-2 跨文化改编成葡萄牙语,并对巴西社区的 2265 人进行施测。对自杀叙述、生活压力事件、自杀意念和自杀未遂进行了确认性因素分析、内部一致性、聚合效度和标准效度:修订后的 SCI-2 单因素模型具有足够的模型拟合度(χ2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < .001,CFI = .99,TLI = .99,RMSEA = .09,SRMR = .05),但不是最佳拟合度。而修订后的五因素模型则表现出良好的拟合度(χ2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < .001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = .06, SRMR = .04)。这两个模型的比较表明,五因素模型的拟合效果优于单因素模型。SCI-2总量表和分量表在生活压力事件、自杀叙述(目标脱离分量表除外)、自杀意念和自杀未遂方面显示出较强的内部一致性、良好的收敛性和标准效度:这些研究结果表明,巴西版 SCI-2 是测量自杀危机综合征症状的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
期刊最新文献
Item-wise validity study of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R): self-reported reactions of hospital personnel exposed to a stressful workplace. Adventures of Psychiatry in a General Hospital: A tale of C-L psychiatry origins and resistance in Brazil. Virtual reality, social intelligence, mirror neurons and bipolar spectrum a new perspective. Costs of dementia in Brazil. Signal Mining and Risk Analysis of Olanzapine Adverse Events in the FAERS Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1