Safety and efficacy of new staple-line reinforcement in lung resection: a prospective study of 48 patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02798-x
Suguru Mitsui, Yugo Tanaka, Megumi Nishikubo, Takefumi Doi, Shinya Tane, Daisuke Hokka, Yuji Mitomo, Yoshimasa Maniwa
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of new staple-line reinforcement in lung resection: a prospective study of 48 patients.","authors":"Suguru Mitsui, Yugo Tanaka, Megumi Nishikubo, Takefumi Doi, Shinya Tane, Daisuke Hokka, Yuji Mitomo, Yoshimasa Maniwa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02798-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of new staple-line reinforcement (SLR) in pulmonary resection through a prospective study and to compare the results of this study with historical control data in an exploratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects of this study were 48 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. The primary endpoint was air leakage from the staple line. The secondary endpoints were the location of air leakage, duration of air leakage, and postoperative pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of intraoperative air leakage from the staple line was 6.3%. Three patients had prolonged air leakage as a postoperative pulmonary complication. No malfunction was found in patients who underwent SLR with the stapling device. When compared with the historical group, the SLR group had a significantly lower incidence of air leakage from the staple line (6.3% vs. 28.5%, P < 0.001) and significantly shorter indwelling chest drainage time (P = 0.049) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of SLR in pulmonary resection was safe and effective. When compared with conventional products, SLR could control intraoperative air leakage from the staple line and shorten time needed for indwelling chest drainage and the length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02798-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of new staple-line reinforcement (SLR) in pulmonary resection through a prospective study and to compare the results of this study with historical control data in an exploratory study.

Methods: The subjects of this study were 48 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. The primary endpoint was air leakage from the staple line. The secondary endpoints were the location of air leakage, duration of air leakage, and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Results: The incidence of intraoperative air leakage from the staple line was 6.3%. Three patients had prolonged air leakage as a postoperative pulmonary complication. No malfunction was found in patients who underwent SLR with the stapling device. When compared with the historical group, the SLR group had a significantly lower incidence of air leakage from the staple line (6.3% vs. 28.5%, P < 0.001) and significantly shorter indwelling chest drainage time (P = 0.049) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The use of SLR in pulmonary resection was safe and effective. When compared with conventional products, SLR could control intraoperative air leakage from the staple line and shorten time needed for indwelling chest drainage and the length of hospital stay.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺切除术中新型缝合线加固的安全性和有效性:一项对 48 名患者进行的前瞻性研究。
目的:通过一项前瞻性研究,评估新型缝合线加固(SLR)在肺切除术中的安全性和有效性,并在一项探索性研究中将该研究结果与历史对照数据进行比较:研究对象为 48 名接受胸腔镜肺叶切除术的患者。主要终点是缝合线漏气。次要终点是漏气位置、漏气持续时间和术后肺部并发症:结果:术中缝合线漏气发生率为 6.3%。结果:术中缝合线漏气发生率为 6.3%,3 名患者术后肺部并发症为长时间漏气。使用订书机装置进行 SLR 的患者未发现任何故障。与历史组相比,SLR 组的订书机线漏气发生率明显较低(6.3% 对 28.5%,P 结论:SLR 在肺切除术中的应用是可行的:在肺切除术中使用 SLR 安全有效。与传统产品相比,SLR 可控制术中缝合线漏气,缩短留置胸腔引流所需的时间和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1