Health Care Students' Perceptions of Bias During Their Clinical Training and Insights on Mitigating It.

Q2 Health Professions Journal of Physician Assistant Education Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JPA.0000000000000550
Mehnaz Parvez, Lisa Barnes, Rebecca Gonzalez, Keanna Prestegaard, Tara J Rick
{"title":"Health Care Students' Perceptions of Bias During Their Clinical Training and Insights on Mitigating It.","authors":"Mehnaz Parvez, Lisa Barnes, Rebecca Gonzalez, Keanna Prestegaard, Tara J Rick","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand health care students' perception of implicit bias and examine their insights to create a bias-free training environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical phase students from one university's 4 health care programs participated in this study. Students were surveyed regarding their knowledge of implicit bias and perception of their experiences in the clinical learning environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 50.9%, N = 161. In total, 52.6% reported having prior training on implicit bias, and 55% self-reported that they had personally observed preceptors who exhibited an implicit bias toward patients based on race, ethnicity, or other qualities. There was no statistically significant relationship between those with prior training on implicit bias and being able to identify implicit bias exhibited by preceptors. Participants also expressed their unwillingness to report an incident unless it is confidential due to fear of retribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that health care students from one university's 4 health care programs perceived implicit bias in their clinical learning environment, which they believe could be improved by taking intentional steps. Some suggestions provided were \"Safe space to report and openly discuss bias,\" \"Education/training on implicit bias,\" \"Time for self-reflection,\" and \"Hiring process that evaluates/trains against implicit bias.\" The implication of our study is to create a bias-free training environment that will help interrupt the propagation of biases contributing to health disparity. Further research should examine a national population and identify interventional methods and outcomes in multiple health care disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To understand health care students' perception of implicit bias and examine their insights to create a bias-free training environment.

Methods: Clinical phase students from one university's 4 health care programs participated in this study. Students were surveyed regarding their knowledge of implicit bias and perception of their experiences in the clinical learning environment.

Results: The response rate was 50.9%, N = 161. In total, 52.6% reported having prior training on implicit bias, and 55% self-reported that they had personally observed preceptors who exhibited an implicit bias toward patients based on race, ethnicity, or other qualities. There was no statistically significant relationship between those with prior training on implicit bias and being able to identify implicit bias exhibited by preceptors. Participants also expressed their unwillingness to report an incident unless it is confidential due to fear of retribution.

Conclusion: This study found that health care students from one university's 4 health care programs perceived implicit bias in their clinical learning environment, which they believe could be improved by taking intentional steps. Some suggestions provided were "Safe space to report and openly discuss bias," "Education/training on implicit bias," "Time for self-reflection," and "Hiring process that evaluates/trains against implicit bias." The implication of our study is to create a bias-free training environment that will help interrupt the propagation of biases contributing to health disparity. Further research should examine a national population and identify interventional methods and outcomes in multiple health care disciplines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生在临床培训期间对偏见的看法以及减少偏见的见解。
目的:了解医疗保健专业学生对隐性偏见的看法,并研究他们对创造无偏见培训环境的见解:来自一所大学 4 个医疗保健专业的临床阶段学生参与了这项研究。调查内容包括学生对内隐性偏见的认识以及他们在临床学习环境中的感受:答复率为 50.9%,N=161。总共有 52.6% 的学生表示之前接受过有关隐性偏见的培训,55% 的学生自称曾亲眼目睹过戒护员因种族、民族或其他特质而对患者表现出隐性偏见。在统计学上,接受过隐性偏见培训的人与能够识别戒酒师表现出的隐性偏见之间没有明显的关系。参与者还表示,由于害怕报复,他们不愿意报告事件,除非事件是保密的:本研究发现,某大学 4 个医疗保健专业的学生认为他们的临床学习环境中存在隐性偏见,他们认为可以通过采取有意识的措施来改善这种情况。他们提出的一些建议包括:"报告和公开讨论偏见的安全空间"、"关于隐性偏见的教育/培训"、"自我反思的时间 "以及 "针对隐性偏见进行评估/培训的招聘流程"。我们研究的意义在于创造一个无偏见的培训环境,这将有助于阻断导致健康差异的偏见的传播。进一步的研究应该对全国人口进行调查,并确定多个医疗学科的干预方法和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Using Four-Component Instructional Design to Create an Interactive Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Physician Associate Students. Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants. Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link? Viewing Medical Education Through the Lens of Second Language Acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1