Physician-led thoracic ultrasound-guided biopsy; a district general hospital perspective.

IF 0.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1177/14782715241231331
M J Cafferkey, G A Martin
{"title":"Physician-led thoracic ultrasound-guided biopsy; a district general hospital perspective.","authors":"M J Cafferkey, G A Martin","doi":"10.1177/14782715241231331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician-led thoracic ultrasound (TUS)-guided biopsies provide a prompt route to tissue diagnosis in pleural and peripheral lung malignancies. This retrospective study reviews the diagnostic performance and safety of this approach in a UK District General Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time to biopsy, diagnostic yield and complication rate were analysed in a cohort of 49 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided tissue sampling between September 2019 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one TUS-guided biopsies were attempted. Mean time from decision to biopsy was 5 days. The overall diagnostic yield was 82%. Complication rate was low; 3 minor adverse effects were reported which led to no change in routine care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This single centre retrospective study shows that physician-led TUS-guided biopsy provides a safe and timely method of obtaining a tissue diagnosis in thoracic malignancy. It offers an alternative to computer tomography (CT)-guided or thoracoscopic biopsies and should be considered in selected patients where local procedural expertise exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"14-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715241231331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician-led thoracic ultrasound (TUS)-guided biopsies provide a prompt route to tissue diagnosis in pleural and peripheral lung malignancies. This retrospective study reviews the diagnostic performance and safety of this approach in a UK District General Hospital.

Methods: Time to biopsy, diagnostic yield and complication rate were analysed in a cohort of 49 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided tissue sampling between September 2019 and December 2022.

Results: Fifty-one TUS-guided biopsies were attempted. Mean time from decision to biopsy was 5 days. The overall diagnostic yield was 82%. Complication rate was low; 3 minor adverse effects were reported which led to no change in routine care.

Conclusion: This single centre retrospective study shows that physician-led TUS-guided biopsy provides a safe and timely method of obtaining a tissue diagnosis in thoracic malignancy. It offers an alternative to computer tomography (CT)-guided or thoracoscopic biopsies and should be considered in selected patients where local procedural expertise exists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生主导的胸部超声引导活检;地区综合医院的视角。
背景:医生指导下的胸部超声(TUS)引导活检为胸膜和周围肺部恶性肿瘤的组织诊断提供了一条捷径。这项回顾性研究回顾了英国一家地区综合医院采用这种方法的诊断效果和安全性:方法:对2019年9月至2022年12月期间接受超声引导组织取样的49名患者的活检时间、诊断率和并发症发生率进行分析:结果:共尝试了51例TUS引导活检。从决定到活检的平均时间为 5 天。总体诊断率为 82%。并发症发生率较低;报告了3例轻微不良反应,未导致常规护理的改变:讨论:这一单中心回顾性研究表明,由医生主导的 TUS 引导活检是获得胸部恶性肿瘤组织诊断的一种安全、及时的方法。它为计算机断层扫描(CT)引导或胸腔镜活检提供了一种替代方法,应考虑在当地有手术专长的特定患者中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
期刊最新文献
Clinical lead in medicine and co-lead at Medical School: Reflections from transitioning through the RCP Chief Registrar programme within the NHS. Dealing with manuscript rejections in academic medicine: It takes two hands to clap. 'Primum non nocere' - The old lie? Realigning history: The Toronto Four insulin discovery team. Development and preliminary validation of a cognitive-physical frailty index in an older adult cohort: The NEDICES study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1