Inner and outer penetrating spinal cord injuries lead to distinct overground walking in mice

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES IBRO Neuroscience Reports Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.02.005
Yuma Shirota , Taketo Otani , Sayo Wasada , Shunsuke Ito , Tokue Mieda , Kazuhiro Nakamura
{"title":"Inner and outer penetrating spinal cord injuries lead to distinct overground walking in mice","authors":"Yuma Shirota ,&nbsp;Taketo Otani ,&nbsp;Sayo Wasada ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Ito ,&nbsp;Tokue Mieda ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating mechanical trauma. Although locomotion of model animals that mimic contusion SCI was actively examined, locomotion after penetrating SCI caused by sharp objects was not extensively studied. Severity of walking difficulty after partial transection of the spinal cord including penetrating SCI likely depends on the regions affected. Therefore, we compared beam walking and overground walking between mice after penetrating SCI at inner spinal cord region and mice with the injury at the outer region. Mice with the both penetrating SCIs did not display changes in beam walking. When appearance and movements of hindlimbs during overground walking was rated using Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion (BMS), however, mice with inner penetrating SCI showed low score shortly after the SCI. However, the score became high at later time points, as seen in contusion SCI mice. By contrast, BMS score did not decrease shortly after the outer penetrating SCI. However, the score became low 3 weeks after the SCI. As quantitative values during overground walking, movement duration in an open field were shorter at 1 day after the two penetrating SCIs. However, slower moving speed and fewer number of movement at 1 day were specific to mice with inner and outer penetrating SCIs, respectively. Moreover, BMS score was correlated with walking distance in open field only in mice with inner penetrating SCI. Thus, inner and outer penetrating SCI cause difficulty in overground walking with different severity and progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000216/pdfft?md5=c58a0a40e161258e8d21401c5d9c5e87&pid=1-s2.0-S2667242124000216-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating mechanical trauma. Although locomotion of model animals that mimic contusion SCI was actively examined, locomotion after penetrating SCI caused by sharp objects was not extensively studied. Severity of walking difficulty after partial transection of the spinal cord including penetrating SCI likely depends on the regions affected. Therefore, we compared beam walking and overground walking between mice after penetrating SCI at inner spinal cord region and mice with the injury at the outer region. Mice with the both penetrating SCIs did not display changes in beam walking. When appearance and movements of hindlimbs during overground walking was rated using Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion (BMS), however, mice with inner penetrating SCI showed low score shortly after the SCI. However, the score became high at later time points, as seen in contusion SCI mice. By contrast, BMS score did not decrease shortly after the outer penetrating SCI. However, the score became low 3 weeks after the SCI. As quantitative values during overground walking, movement duration in an open field were shorter at 1 day after the two penetrating SCIs. However, slower moving speed and fewer number of movement at 1 day were specific to mice with inner and outer penetrating SCIs, respectively. Moreover, BMS score was correlated with walking distance in open field only in mice with inner penetrating SCI. Thus, inner and outer penetrating SCI cause difficulty in overground walking with different severity and progress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内外穿透性脊髓损伤导致小鼠不同的地面行走能力
脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种破坏性机械创伤。尽管人们对模拟挫伤性脊髓损伤的模型动物的运动进行了积极研究,但对锐器造成的穿透性脊髓损伤后的运动却没有进行广泛研究。脊髓部分横断(包括穿透性 SCI)后行走困难的严重程度可能取决于受影响的区域。因此,我们比较了脊髓内侧穿透性损伤小鼠和脊髓外侧损伤小鼠的横梁行走和地面行走情况。两种穿透性脊髓损伤的小鼠在横梁行走方面均无变化。然而,当使用巴索运动小鼠量表(Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion,BMS)对小鼠在地面行走时后肢的外观和运动进行评分时,内侧脊髓穿透性损伤的小鼠在脊髓损伤后不久得分较低。然而,与挫伤性 SCI 小鼠的情况一样,内侧穿透性 SCI 小鼠在 SCI 后不久得分较低,但在随后的时间点得分变高。相比之下,外穿透性 SCI 小鼠的 BMS 评分在损伤后不久没有降低。然而,在 SCI 3 周后,得分变得很低。与地面行走时的定量值一样,两种穿透性 SCI 小鼠在损伤后 1 天,在空旷场地的运动持续时间也较短。然而,内侧和外侧穿透性 SCI 小鼠在 1 天内的移动速度较慢,移动次数较少。此外,只有内侧穿透性 SCI 小鼠的 BMS 评分与野外行走距离相关。因此,内穿透性和外穿透性脊髓损伤导致的地面行走困难的严重程度和进展各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Irisin alleviates chronic constriction injury-induced hyperalgesia and affective disorders in mice through NF-κB and Nrf2 signaling pathways Spontaneous running wheel exercise during pregnancy prevents later neonatal-anoxia-induced somatic and neurodevelopmental alterations Cannabinoid type 2 receptor deficiency leads to Aβ-induced cognitive impairment through promoting microglial sensitivity to Aβ in the prefrontal cortex in mice Effect of microwave radiation on adult neurogenesis and behavior of prenatally exposed rats Modulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor alters the electrophysiological properties of cerebellar Purkinje cells in harmaline-induced essential tremor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1