Development of entrustable professional activities for emergency medicine medical education fellowships: A modified Delphi study

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10944
Stephen Villa MD, MACM, Holly Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE, Lalena M. Yarris MD, MCR, Samuel O. Clarke MD, MAS, Wendy C. Coates MD, Kimberly A. Sokol MD, MACM, Amanda Jurvis DO, MACM, Dimitrios Papanagnou MD, James Ahn MD, MHPE, Emily Hillman MD, MHPE, Melanie Camejo MD, MHPE, Nicole Deiorio MD, Kathryn M. Fischer MD, MS, Meg Wolff MD, MHPE, Molly Estes MD, Sara Dimeo MD, MEHP, Jaime Jordan MD
{"title":"Development of entrustable professional activities for emergency medicine medical education fellowships: A modified Delphi study","authors":"Stephen Villa MD, MACM,&nbsp;Holly Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Lalena M. Yarris MD, MCR,&nbsp;Samuel O. Clarke MD, MAS,&nbsp;Wendy C. Coates MD,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Sokol MD, MACM,&nbsp;Amanda Jurvis DO, MACM,&nbsp;Dimitrios Papanagnou MD,&nbsp;James Ahn MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Emily Hillman MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Melanie Camejo MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Nicole Deiorio MD,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Fischer MD, MS,&nbsp;Meg Wolff MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Molly Estes MD,&nbsp;Sara Dimeo MD, MEHP,&nbsp;Jaime Jordan MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>It is essential that medical education (MedEd) fellows achieve desired outcomes prior to graduation. Despite the increase in postgraduate MedEd fellowships in emergency medicine (EM), there is no consistently applied competency framework. We sought to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for EM MedEd fellows.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From 2021 to 2022, we used a modified Delphi method to achieve consensus for EPAs. EM education experts generated an initial list of 173 EPAs after literature review. In each Delphi round, panelists were asked to make a binary choice of whether to include the EPA. We determined an inclusion threshold of 70% agreement a priori. After the first round, given the large number of EPAs meeting inclusion threshold, panelists were instructed to vote whether each EPA should be included in the “20 most important” EPAs for a MedEd fellowship. Modifications were made between rounds based on expert feedback. We calculated descriptive statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen experts completed four Delphi rounds each with 100% response. After Round 1, 87 EPAs were eliminated and two were combined. Following Round 2, 46 EPAs were eliminated, seven were combined, and three were included in the final list. After the third round, one EPA was eliminated and 13 were included. After the fourth round, 11 EPAs were eliminated. The final list consisted of 16 EPAs in domains of career development, education theory and methods, research and scholarship, and educational program administration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a list of 16 EPAs for EM MedEd fellowships, the first step in implementing competency-based MedEd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is essential that medical education (MedEd) fellows achieve desired outcomes prior to graduation. Despite the increase in postgraduate MedEd fellowships in emergency medicine (EM), there is no consistently applied competency framework. We sought to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for EM MedEd fellows.

Methods

From 2021 to 2022, we used a modified Delphi method to achieve consensus for EPAs. EM education experts generated an initial list of 173 EPAs after literature review. In each Delphi round, panelists were asked to make a binary choice of whether to include the EPA. We determined an inclusion threshold of 70% agreement a priori. After the first round, given the large number of EPAs meeting inclusion threshold, panelists were instructed to vote whether each EPA should be included in the “20 most important” EPAs for a MedEd fellowship. Modifications were made between rounds based on expert feedback. We calculated descriptive statistics.

Results

Seventeen experts completed four Delphi rounds each with 100% response. After Round 1, 87 EPAs were eliminated and two were combined. Following Round 2, 46 EPAs were eliminated, seven were combined, and three were included in the final list. After the third round, one EPA was eliminated and 13 were included. After the fourth round, 11 EPAs were eliminated. The final list consisted of 16 EPAs in domains of career development, education theory and methods, research and scholarship, and educational program administration.

Conclusions

We developed a list of 16 EPAs for EM MedEd fellowships, the first step in implementing competency-based MedEd.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为急诊医学教育研究金制定可委托的专业活动:经修改的德尔菲研究
背景 医学教育(MedEd)研究员在毕业前取得预期成果至关重要。尽管急诊医学(EM)专业的医学教育研究生人数不断增加,但却没有一个统一的能力框架。我们试图为急诊医学教育研究员制定可委托的专业活动(EPA)。 方法 从 2021 年到 2022 年,我们采用改良德尔菲法就 EPA 达成共识。EM 教育专家在查阅文献后,生成了一份包含 173 项 EPA 的初步清单。在德尔菲法的每一轮中,小组成员都被要求对是否纳入 EPA 进行二元选择。我们事先确定的纳入阈值是 70% 的一致意见。第一轮结束后,鉴于符合纳入阈值的 EPA 数量较多,我们指示小组成员投票决定是否将每项 EPA 纳入医学教育奖学金 "20 项最重要 "的 EPA 中。根据专家的反馈意见,我们在两轮之间进行了修改。我们计算了描述性统计数据。 结果 17 位专家完成了四轮德尔菲讨论,每轮的回复率均为 100%。第一轮后,87 项 EPA 被淘汰,两项被合并。第二轮后,46 个 EPA 被淘汰,7 个被合并,3 个被列入最终名单。第三轮后,1 个环保局被淘汰,13 个环保局被纳入。第四轮后,11 个环保局被淘汰。最终名单包括职业发展、教育理论与方法、研究与学术以及教育项目管理等领域的 16 项 EPA。 结论 我们为 EM MedEd 奖学金制定了 16 项 EPA,这是实施基于能力的 MedEd 的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience. Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1