Vulnerability and perceived risks in the peer-to-peer sharing economy

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Consumer Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1111/ijcs.13028
Barbara Culiberg, Mateja Kos Koklic, Monika Kukar-Kinney, Irena Vida
{"title":"Vulnerability and perceived risks in the peer-to-peer sharing economy","authors":"Barbara Culiberg,&nbsp;Mateja Kos Koklic,&nbsp;Monika Kukar-Kinney,&nbsp;Irena Vida","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.13028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing economy, as an attractive alternative to permanent ownership, creates a triadic relationship among three groups of participants: service enablers, providers, and consumers. One of its main features is the expansion of the user's role to the roles of consumer and provider, or “prosumer.” However, in their role as prosumers, individuals may have an aversion to participating in the P2P sharing economy market due to their sense of powerlessness and lack of control, suggesting that their vulnerability needs to be considered. Despite their importance, prosumers have not received commensurate attention in the sharing economy literature. To address this gap, we examined prosumer vulnerability's impact on risk perceptions in the role of prosumer and illuminated these risks' impact on intentions to participate. The results from a U.S. survey indicate that vulnerability is a significant driver of all risk types, for both consumers and providers. Furthermore, psychological risk and security risk are found to significantly decrease intention to participate. Unexpectedly, social risk increases intention to participate among consumers and providers, while privacy and health risks are insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcs.13028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing economy, as an attractive alternative to permanent ownership, creates a triadic relationship among three groups of participants: service enablers, providers, and consumers. One of its main features is the expansion of the user's role to the roles of consumer and provider, or “prosumer.” However, in their role as prosumers, individuals may have an aversion to participating in the P2P sharing economy market due to their sense of powerlessness and lack of control, suggesting that their vulnerability needs to be considered. Despite their importance, prosumers have not received commensurate attention in the sharing economy literature. To address this gap, we examined prosumer vulnerability's impact on risk perceptions in the role of prosumer and illuminated these risks' impact on intentions to participate. The results from a U.S. survey indicate that vulnerability is a significant driver of all risk types, for both consumers and providers. Furthermore, psychological risk and security risk are found to significantly decrease intention to participate. Unexpectedly, social risk increases intention to participate among consumers and providers, while privacy and health risks are insignificant.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点对点共享经济中的脆弱性和感知风险
点对点(P2P)共享经济作为永久所有权的一种有吸引力的替代方式,在三类参与者之间建立了一种三位一体的关系:服务推动者、提供者和消费者。其主要特点之一是将用户的角色扩展为消费者和提供者,即 "专业消费者"。然而,在扮演 "消费者 "角色时,个人可能会因无力感和缺乏控制而对参与 P2P 共享经济市场产生反感,这表明需要考虑他们的脆弱性。尽管 "主消费者 "非常重要,但在共享经济文献中却没有得到相应的关注。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了消费者的脆弱性对消费者角色风险感知的影响,并阐明了这些风险对参与意愿的影响。美国的一项调查结果表明,对于消费者和提供者而言,脆弱性是所有风险类型的重要驱动因素。此外,心理风险和安全风险会显著降低参与意愿。出乎意料的是,社会风险增加了消费者和提供者的参与意愿,而隐私和健康风险则微不足道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Future of Tech-Infused Luxury: A Roadmap and Research Directions Influencer Marketing, Narrative Transportation, and Consumer Well-Being: An Exploration of How Virtual Influencers Impact Followers' Well-Being Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda Consumer Perspectives on Food Traceability—A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda Service Quality in Spectator Sports: A Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1