Social practice theory and household water demand: A review of literature and research evidence

WIREs Water Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1002/wat2.1719
Joseph Cahill, Claire Hoolohan, Alison L. Browne
{"title":"Social practice theory and household water demand: A review of literature and research evidence","authors":"Joseph Cahill, Claire Hoolohan, Alison L. Browne","doi":"10.1002/wat2.1719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changing climate, rapid increases in global consumption, and shock events are increasing stress on water resources globally. For policy makers and water sector stakeholders tasked with reducing demand, and for academic researchers interested in understanding how these complex issues intertwine to create current and future water demand profiles, the shortcomings of individualized behavior change approaches driven by psycho-econometric understandings of resource consumption is increasingly evident. Since the early 2000s, social practice theory has been increasingly recognized as deepening understandings of the complex ways water is consumed and the dynamic factors that influence household demands. This review examines evidence of how social practice ideas are deployed in academic research in scope (theory; geographical; practices entities/performances; sites, locations, and temporality of practices; infrastructural configurations); methods (historical; talk—interviews, focus groups; diaries; ethnography and home tours; surveys; living labs, experiments, design methods; mixed methods); and implications (co-production; materiality; diversity; disruption and insecurity; inequalities) including for policy and practice. Emerging from the review is a set of ideas that demonstrate how to apply insights from social practice more effectively in water studies and in water management, aiding the exploration of new areas of enquiry, policies and mechanisms to enable less intensive patterns of water use. This review points to a need for increased collaboration across the water sector and wider stakeholders to enact deep and meaningful change to how water is supplied and consumed in society.","PeriodicalId":501223,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The changing climate, rapid increases in global consumption, and shock events are increasing stress on water resources globally. For policy makers and water sector stakeholders tasked with reducing demand, and for academic researchers interested in understanding how these complex issues intertwine to create current and future water demand profiles, the shortcomings of individualized behavior change approaches driven by psycho-econometric understandings of resource consumption is increasingly evident. Since the early 2000s, social practice theory has been increasingly recognized as deepening understandings of the complex ways water is consumed and the dynamic factors that influence household demands. This review examines evidence of how social practice ideas are deployed in academic research in scope (theory; geographical; practices entities/performances; sites, locations, and temporality of practices; infrastructural configurations); methods (historical; talk—interviews, focus groups; diaries; ethnography and home tours; surveys; living labs, experiments, design methods; mixed methods); and implications (co-production; materiality; diversity; disruption and insecurity; inequalities) including for policy and practice. Emerging from the review is a set of ideas that demonstrate how to apply insights from social practice more effectively in water studies and in water management, aiding the exploration of new areas of enquiry, policies and mechanisms to enable less intensive patterns of water use. This review points to a need for increased collaboration across the water sector and wider stakeholders to enact deep and meaningful change to how water is supplied and consumed in society.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会实践理论与家庭用水需求:文献和研究证据综述
不断变化的气候、全球用水量的快速增长以及突发事件都在增加全球水资源的压力。对于肩负减少需求任务的政策制定者和水行业利益相关者来说,对于有兴趣了解这些复杂问题如何交织在一起形成当前和未来水资源需求状况的学术研究人员来说,以对资源消耗的心理计量学理解为驱动力的个性化行为改变方法的缺点日益明显。自 21 世纪初以来,人们越来越认识到社会实践理论加深了人们对复杂的用水方式以及影响家庭需求的动态因素的理解。本综述从范围(理论;地理;实践实体/表现;实践的地点、位置和时间性;基础设施配置);方法(历史;谈话-访谈、焦点小组;日记;人种学和家庭参观;调查;生活实验室、实验、设计方法;混合方法);以及包括对政策和实践的影响(共同生产;物质性;多样性;破坏和不安全;不平等)等方面考察了学术研究中如何运用社会实践思想的证据。本综述提出了一系列观点,展示了如何在水资源研究和水资源管理中更有效地应用社会实践的见解,帮助探索新的研究领域、政策和机制,以实现较低强度的用水模式。本综述指出,有必要加强水部门和更广泛的利益相关者之间的合作,以便对社会的供水和用水方式进行深刻而有意义的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anishinaabek responsibilities and relationships are demonstrated in N'bi (Water) Declarations Food for fish: Challenges and opportunities for quantifying foodscapes in river networks Immunity through technification? A critical review of water governance discourses in Tunisia Optimization methods in water system operation Water on the mind: Mapping behavioral and psychological research on water security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1