Dualities of digital services: everyday digital services as positive and negative contributors to customer well-being

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Service Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0075
Tiina Kemppainen, Tiina Elina Paananen
{"title":"Dualities of digital services: everyday digital services as positive and negative contributors to customer well-being","authors":"Tiina Kemppainen, Tiina Elina Paananen","doi":"10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study examines the dualities of digital services – that is, how customers’ favorite everyday digital services can positively and negatively contribute to their well-being. Thus, the study describes the meanings of favorite digital services as part of customers’ everyday lives and the types of well-being to which such services can contribute.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We used a qualitative research approach through semi-structured interviews conducted in 2021 to collect data from 14 young adults (22–31 years old) who actively used digital services in their daily lives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Our findings revealed that customers’ favorite everyday digital services can contribute to their mental well-being, social well-being, and intellectual well-being. Within these three dimensions of well-being, we identified nine dualities of digital services that describe their positive and negative contributions: (1) digital escapism versus digital disruption, (2) digital relaxation versus digital stress, (3) digital empowerment versus digital subjugation, (4) digital augmentation versus digital emptiness, (5) digital socialization versus digital isolation, (6) digital togetherness versus digital exclusion, (7) digital self-expression versus digital pressure, (8) digital learning versus digital dependence, and (9) digital inspiration versus digital stagnation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>These findings suggest that everyday digital services have the potential to contribute to customer well-being in various aspects – both positively and negatively – accentuating the need for service providers to decipher the impacts of their offerings on well-being. Indeed, understanding the relationship between digital services and customer well-being can help companies tailor their services to customers’ needs. Companies that prioritize customer well-being not only benefit their customers but also create sustainable growth opportunities in the long run. Further, companies can use the derived information in service design to develop marketing strategies that emphasize the positive impacts of their digital services on customer well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Although prior transformative service studies have investigated the well-being of multiple stakeholders, such studies have focused on services related to the physical and healthcare domains. Consequently, the role of everyday digital services as contributors to customer well-being is an under-researched topic. In addition, the concept of well-being and its various dimensions has received limited attention in previous service research. By investigating everyday digital services and their multidimensional contribution to customer well-being, this study broadens the perspective on well-being within TSR and aids in refining a more precise conceptualization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the dualities of digital services – that is, how customers’ favorite everyday digital services can positively and negatively contribute to their well-being. Thus, the study describes the meanings of favorite digital services as part of customers’ everyday lives and the types of well-being to which such services can contribute.

Design/methodology/approach

We used a qualitative research approach through semi-structured interviews conducted in 2021 to collect data from 14 young adults (22–31 years old) who actively used digital services in their daily lives.

Findings

Our findings revealed that customers’ favorite everyday digital services can contribute to their mental well-being, social well-being, and intellectual well-being. Within these three dimensions of well-being, we identified nine dualities of digital services that describe their positive and negative contributions: (1) digital escapism versus digital disruption, (2) digital relaxation versus digital stress, (3) digital empowerment versus digital subjugation, (4) digital augmentation versus digital emptiness, (5) digital socialization versus digital isolation, (6) digital togetherness versus digital exclusion, (7) digital self-expression versus digital pressure, (8) digital learning versus digital dependence, and (9) digital inspiration versus digital stagnation.

Practical implications

These findings suggest that everyday digital services have the potential to contribute to customer well-being in various aspects – both positively and negatively – accentuating the need for service providers to decipher the impacts of their offerings on well-being. Indeed, understanding the relationship between digital services and customer well-being can help companies tailor their services to customers’ needs. Companies that prioritize customer well-being not only benefit their customers but also create sustainable growth opportunities in the long run. Further, companies can use the derived information in service design to develop marketing strategies that emphasize the positive impacts of their digital services on customer well-being.

Originality/value

Although prior transformative service studies have investigated the well-being of multiple stakeholders, such studies have focused on services related to the physical and healthcare domains. Consequently, the role of everyday digital services as contributors to customer well-being is an under-researched topic. In addition, the concept of well-being and its various dimensions has received limited attention in previous service research. By investigating everyday digital services and their multidimensional contribution to customer well-being, this study broadens the perspective on well-being within TSR and aids in refining a more precise conceptualization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字服务的双重性:日常数字服务对客户福祉的积极和消极贡献
目的本研究探讨了数字服务的双重性,即客户最喜爱的日常数字服务如何对其幸福感产生积极和消极的影响。因此,本研究描述了最受喜爱的数字服务作为客户日常生活一部分的意义,以及此类服务可促进的幸福感类型。研究结果我们的研究结果显示,客户最喜爱的日常数字服务可促进其精神幸福感、社会幸福感和智力幸福感。在这三个幸福维度中,我们发现了数字服务的九种二元性,分别描述了它们的积极和消极贡献:(1) 数字逃避与数字破坏,(2) 数字放松与数字压力,(3) 数字赋权与数字征服,(4) 数字增强与数字空虚,(5) 数字社交与数字孤立,(6) 数字团结与数字排斥,(7) 数字自我表达与数字压力,(8) 数字学习与数字依赖,以及 (9) 数字启发与数字停滞。这些研究结果表明,日常数字服务有可能在不同方面--无论是积极的还是消极的--促进客户的幸福感,因此服务提供商更有必要解读其提供的服务对幸福感的影响。事实上,了解数字服务与客户福祉之间的关系有助于企业根据客户需求量身定制服务。优先考虑客户福祉的公司不仅能让客户受益,还能创造长期的可持续增长机会。此外,企业还可以在服务设计中利用所获得的信息制定营销策略,强调其数字服务对客户福祉的积极影响。原创性/价值虽然之前的变革性服务研究已经调查了多个利益相关者的福祉,但这些研究主要集中在与物理和医疗保健领域相关的服务上。因此,日常数字服务对客户幸福感的促进作用是一个研究不足的课题。此外,在以往的服务研究中,幸福感的概念及其各个维度受到的关注也很有限。通过调查日常数字服务及其对客户幸福感的多维贡献,本研究拓宽了 TSR 中幸福感的视角,有助于完善更精确的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
15.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Managing Service Quality – Impact Factor: 1.286 (2015) – the Journal of Service Theory and Practice (JSTP) aims to publish research in the field of service management that not only makes a theoretical contribution to the service literature, but also scrutinizes and helps improve industry practices by offering specific recommendations and action plans to practitioners. Recognizing the importance of the service sector across the globe, the journal encourages submissions from and/or studying issues from around the world. JSTP gives prominence to research based on real world data, be it quantitative or qualitative. The journal also encourages the submission of strong conceptual and theoretical papers that make a substantive contribution to the scholarly literature in service management. JSTP publishes double-blind peer reviewed papers and encourages submissions from both academics and practitioners. The changing social structures and values, as well as new developments in economic, political, and technological fields are creating sea-changes in the philosophy, strategic aims, operational practices, and structures of many organizations. These changes are particularly relevant to the service sector, as public demand for high standards increases, and organizations fight for both market share and public credibility. The journal specifically addresses solutions to these challenges from a global, multi-cultural, and multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Does employee intervention encourage or discourage the spread of dysfunctional customer behavior? Determinants of customer buying behaviour in omnichannel retailing: a systematic literature review and future research directions Unlocking emotional labor: how organizational control systems shape frontline service employees’ emotional labor The edifying body: the role of embodied practices in the social production of servicescapes Occupational stress as a mediator between organisational intelligence traits and digital government service quality: a triangulation design approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1