The effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on the incidence of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE European Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102343
Zainab Alimoradi , Farideh Kazemi , Azita Tiznobeik , Mark D. Griffiths , Seyyedeh Zahra Masoumi , Soodabeh Aghababaei
{"title":"The effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on the incidence of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zainab Alimoradi ,&nbsp;Farideh Kazemi ,&nbsp;Azita Tiznobeik ,&nbsp;Mark D. Griffiths ,&nbsp;Seyyedeh Zahra Masoumi ,&nbsp;Soodabeh Aghababaei","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The results of previous studies regarding the effect of vitamin D on the incidence of preeclampsia are inconsistent. Therefore, the primary objective of the present review was to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the risk of preeclampsia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five major scientific databases were searched from inception to June 10, 2023. Studies with randomized controlled trial designs were identified. To assess the methodological quality of the selected studies, the Cochrane Tool Checklist (CTC) was used. The random effect model was chosen as a combination model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the standard χ<sup>2</sup> test, and the intensity of heterogeneity was calculated using <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>. Effect size indicators including risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with estimated 95 % confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled RR of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.47 to 0.78; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>=14.4 %; χ<sup>2</sup>=23.37; <em>p</em> = 0.27; tau<sup>2</sup>=0.05), and indicated a 39 % reduction in the risk of preeclampsia. The pooled RD of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was -0.03 (95 % CI: -0.05 to -0.01; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>=45.5 %; χ<sup>2</sup>=36.68; <em>p</em> = 0.01; tau<sup>2</sup>=0.0008) and the difference in the risk of preeclampsia among women who received vitamin D supplements was 3 % less than the control group. The NNT was 29 (95 % CI: 20 to 52).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduces preeclampsia during pregnancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The results of previous studies regarding the effect of vitamin D on the incidence of preeclampsia are inconsistent. Therefore, the primary objective of the present review was to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the risk of preeclampsia.

Methods

Five major scientific databases were searched from inception to June 10, 2023. Studies with randomized controlled trial designs were identified. To assess the methodological quality of the selected studies, the Cochrane Tool Checklist (CTC) was used. The random effect model was chosen as a combination model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the standard χ2 test, and the intensity of heterogeneity was calculated using I2. Effect size indicators including risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with estimated 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled RR of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.47 to 0.78; I2=14.4 %; χ2=23.37; p = 0.27; tau2=0.05), and indicated a 39 % reduction in the risk of preeclampsia. The pooled RD of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was -0.03 (95 % CI: -0.05 to -0.01; I2=45.5 %; χ2=36.68; p = 0.01; tau2=0.0008) and the difference in the risk of preeclampsia among women who received vitamin D supplements was 3 % less than the control group. The NNT was 29 (95 % CI: 20 to 52).

Conclusion

Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduces preeclampsia during pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕期补充维生素 D 对子痫前期发病率的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析
以往关于维生素 D 对子痫前期发病率影响的研究结果并不一致。因此,本综述的主要目的是确定孕期补充维生素 D 对子痫前期风险的影响。我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 6 月 10 日的五个主要科学数据库。检索了采用随机对照试验设计的研究。为了评估所选研究的方法学质量,使用了科克伦工具检查表(CTC)。选择随机效应模型作为组合模型。统计异质性采用标准 χ 检验进行评估,异质性强度采用 。计算效应大小指标,包括风险比(RR)、风险差异(RD)和治疗所需人数(NNT),并估计 95% 的置信区间。系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入了 19 项研究。与对照组相比,干预组先兆子痫的总RR为0.61 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.78; =14.4%; χ=23.37; =0.27; tau=0.05),表明先兆子痫的风险降低了39%。与对照组相比,干预组先兆子痫的汇总RD为-0.03 (95% CI: -0.05 to -0.01; =45.5%; χ=36.68; =0.01; tau=0.0008),接受维生素D补充剂的妇女的先兆子痫风险差异比对照组低3%。NNT为29(95% CI:20至52)。补充维生素D可明显减少孕期子痫前期的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of clinical control and symptom severity on attitudes towards holistic complementary alternative medicine in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study Evolving research methodologies are shaping the future of integrative medicine Hotspots and trends in global antiviral herbal basic research: A visualization analysis Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Reflexology specific guidance for using the template for the intervention description and replication (TIDieR): A delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1