Unveiling the Influence of the Curve of Spee on Bite Force and Chewing Ability: A Comparative Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1155/2024/6533841
Zainab Ali Alkhalaf, Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Rakhi Issrani, Raghad Mohammed Alsaleh, Sultana Zamil Almegren, Mahmoud Gamal Salloum
{"title":"Unveiling the Influence of the Curve of Spee on Bite Force and Chewing Ability: A Comparative Study","authors":"Zainab Ali Alkhalaf,&nbsp;Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen,&nbsp;Kiran Kumar Ganji,&nbsp;Mohammad Khursheed Alam,&nbsp;Rakhi Issrani,&nbsp;Raghad Mohammed Alsaleh,&nbsp;Sultana Zamil Almegren,&nbsp;Mahmoud Gamal Salloum","doi":"10.1155/2024/6533841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Aim</i>. To investigate the impact of the curve of Spee (CS) accentuation on bite force, chewing ability, and additionally, other factors that influence chewing ability and bite force such as restorations, caries, gender, habits, and TMJ problems. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. 231 participants (118 male and 113 female, mean age = ±27.96 years) were recruited for this cross-section study. Participants completed a data collection sheet in which age, gender, Angle’s classification of malocclusion, overjet, overbite, TMJ problems, habits, restorations, and caries experience were recorded. Two examiners made a lower impression, chewing ability test and measured the bite force for each participant. Measurement of the CS was obtained digitally from the poured dental cast, and the categorization was as follows: flat (&lt;1 mm), normal (1-2 mm), or deep (&gt;2 mm). <i>Results</i>. The mean maximum bite force (MBF) was 468.722 N for participants with flat CS, 389.822 N for normal CS, 647.08 N for deep CS, and 384.667 N for reverse CS. The average MBF was higher for participants with deep CS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). MBF force was higher in males. However, BMI was not significantly related to MBF values. Participants with normal and flat CS have comparable chewing capacity (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Also, a significant difference in bite force and chewing ability was found between the three categories of CS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Bite force variations across various CS types were linked to gender and habits. Chewing ability showed no differences concerning gender, habits, TMJ problems, caries, or restorations, emphasizing CS’s significant impact on bite force while showcasing the unchanged nature of chewing ability amidst diverse factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6533841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the impact of the curve of Spee (CS) accentuation on bite force, chewing ability, and additionally, other factors that influence chewing ability and bite force such as restorations, caries, gender, habits, and TMJ problems. Materials and Methods. 231 participants (118 male and 113 female, mean age = ±27.96 years) were recruited for this cross-section study. Participants completed a data collection sheet in which age, gender, Angle’s classification of malocclusion, overjet, overbite, TMJ problems, habits, restorations, and caries experience were recorded. Two examiners made a lower impression, chewing ability test and measured the bite force for each participant. Measurement of the CS was obtained digitally from the poured dental cast, and the categorization was as follows: flat (<1 mm), normal (1-2 mm), or deep (>2 mm). Results. The mean maximum bite force (MBF) was 468.722 N for participants with flat CS, 389.822 N for normal CS, 647.08 N for deep CS, and 384.667 N for reverse CS. The average MBF was higher for participants with deep CS (p < 0.05). MBF force was higher in males. However, BMI was not significantly related to MBF values. Participants with normal and flat CS have comparable chewing capacity (p > 0.05). Also, a significant difference in bite force and chewing ability was found between the three categories of CS (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Bite force variations across various CS types were linked to gender and habits. Chewing ability showed no differences concerning gender, habits, TMJ problems, caries, or restorations, emphasizing CS’s significant impact on bite force while showcasing the unchanged nature of chewing ability amidst diverse factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示斯佩氏曲线对咬合力和咀嚼能力的影响:比较研究
目的研究斯贝曲线(CS)加重对咬合力和咀嚼能力的影响,以及影响咀嚼能力和咬合力的其他因素,如修复体、龋齿、性别、习惯和颞下颌关节问题。材料与方法这项横断面研究共招募了 231 名参与者(男性 118 人,女性 113 人,平均年龄 = ±27.96 岁)。参与者填写了一份数据收集表,其中记录了年龄、性别、安格尔错颌畸形分类、过咬合、过咬合、颞下颌关节问题、习惯、修复和龋病经历。两名检查员为每位受试者制作下牙印片、进行咀嚼能力测试并测量咬合力。从浇铸的牙模中以数字方式获得 CS 的测量值,并将其分为以下几类:扁平(1 毫米)、正常(1-2 毫米)或深(2 毫米)。结果平CS参与者的平均最大咬合力(MBF)为468.722牛顿,正常CS为389.822牛顿,深CS为647.08牛顿,反CS为384.667牛顿。深度 CS 的参与者的平均 MBF 值更高。男性的 MBF 力量更大。然而,体重指数与 MBF 值没有明显关系。正常和扁平 CS 的参与者的咀嚼能力相当()。此外,三类 CS 的咬合力和咀嚼能力也存在明显差异()。结论不同类型 CS 的咬合力差异与性别和习惯有关。咀嚼能力在性别、习惯、颞下颌关节问题、龋齿或修复方面没有差异,这强调了 CS 对咬合力的重要影响,同时也展示了咀嚼能力在各种因素中的不变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence of Unrecorded Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England, and Spain: The Multinational, Observational REVEAL-CKD Study Influencing Factors for Depression and Depression Aggravation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Blood Urea Nitrogen to Albumin Ratio Was Associated With Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity–Adjusted Analysis Affordability of Original and Generic Antihypertensive Drugs Under the National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy and Basic Medical Insurance System: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Xi’an, China Guidelines for Returning to Dance Following Concussion: Adaptations From Sport Concussion Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1