Unconditioned stimulus devaluation decreases the generalization of costly safety behaviors

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102847
Alex H.K. Wong, Minita Franzen, Matthias J. Wieser
{"title":"Unconditioned stimulus devaluation decreases the generalization of costly safety behaviors","authors":"Alex H.K. Wong,&nbsp;Minita Franzen,&nbsp;Matthias J. Wieser","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Safety behaviors are often maladaptive in clinical anxiety as they typically persist without realistic threat and cause various impairments. In the laboratory, safety behaviors are modelled by responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) that reduce the occurrence of an expected aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). Preliminary evidence suggests that US devaluation, a procedure that decreases US aversiveness, devalues the threat value of the CS and thus diminishes safety behaviors to the CS. This study (n = 78) aimed to extend this finding and examined whether US-devaluation can reduce the generalization of safety behaviors to various stimuli. After acquiring safety behaviors to CSs of different categories, the US predicted by one CS category was devalued. In test, participants showed a selective reduction in safety behaviors to novel stimuli of the devalued CS category, reflecting a decrease in generalization of safety behaviors. Trait anxiety was associated with persistent generalized safety behaviors to novel stimuli of the devalued category. We discuss how US devaluation may improve treatment outcome but also the challenges of clinical translation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102847"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000239/pdfft?md5=97b40ace64e2e142e14574cb57892d68&pid=1-s2.0-S0887618524000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety behaviors are often maladaptive in clinical anxiety as they typically persist without realistic threat and cause various impairments. In the laboratory, safety behaviors are modelled by responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) that reduce the occurrence of an expected aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). Preliminary evidence suggests that US devaluation, a procedure that decreases US aversiveness, devalues the threat value of the CS and thus diminishes safety behaviors to the CS. This study (n = 78) aimed to extend this finding and examined whether US-devaluation can reduce the generalization of safety behaviors to various stimuli. After acquiring safety behaviors to CSs of different categories, the US predicted by one CS category was devalued. In test, participants showed a selective reduction in safety behaviors to novel stimuli of the devalued CS category, reflecting a decrease in generalization of safety behaviors. Trait anxiety was associated with persistent generalized safety behaviors to novel stimuli of the devalued category. We discuss how US devaluation may improve treatment outcome but also the challenges of clinical translation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无条件刺激贬值会降低代价高昂的安全行为的普遍性
在临床焦虑症中,安全行为通常是不适应的,因为它们通常在没有现实威胁的情况下持续存在,并导致各种障碍。在实验室中,安全行为是通过对条件刺激(CS)的反应来模拟的,这种反应会减少预期的厌恶性非条件刺激(US)的出现。初步证据表明,US 贬值(一种降低 US 厌恶性的程序)会降低 CS 的威胁价值,从而减少对 CS 的安全行为。本研究(n = 78)旨在扩展这一发现,并考察US贬值是否会减少对各种刺激的安全行为的泛化。在获得对不同类别 CS 的安全行为后,对一个 CS 类别所预测的 US 进行贬值。在测试中,受试者对被贬低的 CS 类别的新刺激表现出选择性的安全行为减少,这反映了安全行为泛化的减少。特质焦虑与对贬值类别的新刺激的持续泛化安全行为有关。我们讨论了美国贬值如何改善治疗效果,以及临床转化所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1