The effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional capacity in patients with early stroke: a meta-analysis

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Review of Aging and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1186/s11556-024-00338-7
Yun-Shan Zhang, Kai Zhang, Lang Huang, Jing-Xue Wei, Zi-Ting Bi, Jing-Hua Xiao, Jian Huang, Chao-Song Luo, Ying-Dong Li, Jia-Mei Zhang
{"title":"The effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional capacity in patients with early stroke: a meta-analysis","authors":"Yun-Shan Zhang, Kai Zhang, Lang Huang, Jing-Xue Wei, Zi-Ting Bi, Jing-Hua Xiao, Jian Huang, Chao-Song Luo, Ying-Dong Li, Jia-Mei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00338-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respiratory muscle training is a continuous and standardized training of respiratory muscles, but the evidence of the effects on early stroke patients is not clear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional capacity in patients with early stroke. PubMed, Embase, PEDro, ScienceDirect, AMED, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception to December 8, 2023 for articles about studies that 1) stroke patients with age ≥ 18 years old. Early stroke < 3 months at the time of diagnosis, 2) respiratory muscle training, including inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, 3) the following measurements are the outcomes: respiratory muscle strength, respiratory muscle endurance, pulmonary function testing, dyspnea fatigue score, and functional capacity, 4) randomized controlled trials. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted data and appraised the methodological quality and risk of bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool by two independent reviewers. RevMan 5.4 with a random effect model was used for data synthesis and analysis. Mean differences (MD) or standard mean differences (SMD), and 95% confidence interval were calculated (95%CI). Nine studies met inclusion criteria, recruiting 526 participants (mean age 61.6 years). Respiratory muscle training produced a statistically significant effect on improving maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 10.93, 95%CI: 8.51–13.36), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 9.01, 95%CI: 5.34–12.69), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.54–1.10), peak expiratory flow (MD = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.94–1.63), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.13–1.59), functional capacity (SMD = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.05–0.98) in patients with early stroke. Subgroup analysis showed that inspiratory muscle training combined with expiratory muscle training was beneficial to the recovery of maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 9.78, 95%CI: 5.96–13.60), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 11.62, 95%CI: 3.80–19.43), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.47–1.27), peak expiratory flow (MD = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.22–1.80), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.41–1.11), functional capacity (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.08–1.13), while inspiratory muscle training could improve maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 11.60, 95%CI: 8.15–15.05), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 7.06, 95%CI: 3.50–10.62), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.21–1.21), peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.37–1.31), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.08–0.72). This study provides good-quality evidence that respiratory muscle training is effective in improving respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and functional capacity for patients with early stroke. Inspiratory muscle training combined with expiratory muscle training seems to promote functional recovery in patients with early stroke more than inspiratory muscle training alone. Prospero registration number: CRD42021291918.","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00338-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respiratory muscle training is a continuous and standardized training of respiratory muscles, but the evidence of the effects on early stroke patients is not clear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional capacity in patients with early stroke. PubMed, Embase, PEDro, ScienceDirect, AMED, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception to December 8, 2023 for articles about studies that 1) stroke patients with age ≥ 18 years old. Early stroke < 3 months at the time of diagnosis, 2) respiratory muscle training, including inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, 3) the following measurements are the outcomes: respiratory muscle strength, respiratory muscle endurance, pulmonary function testing, dyspnea fatigue score, and functional capacity, 4) randomized controlled trials. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted data and appraised the methodological quality and risk of bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool by two independent reviewers. RevMan 5.4 with a random effect model was used for data synthesis and analysis. Mean differences (MD) or standard mean differences (SMD), and 95% confidence interval were calculated (95%CI). Nine studies met inclusion criteria, recruiting 526 participants (mean age 61.6 years). Respiratory muscle training produced a statistically significant effect on improving maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 10.93, 95%CI: 8.51–13.36), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 9.01, 95%CI: 5.34–12.69), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.54–1.10), peak expiratory flow (MD = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.94–1.63), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.13–1.59), functional capacity (SMD = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.05–0.98) in patients with early stroke. Subgroup analysis showed that inspiratory muscle training combined with expiratory muscle training was beneficial to the recovery of maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 9.78, 95%CI: 5.96–13.60), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 11.62, 95%CI: 3.80–19.43), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.47–1.27), peak expiratory flow (MD = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.22–1.80), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.41–1.11), functional capacity (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.08–1.13), while inspiratory muscle training could improve maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 11.60, 95%CI: 8.15–15.05), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 7.06, 95%CI: 3.50–10.62), forced vital capacity (MD = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.21–1.21), peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.37–1.31), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.08–0.72). This study provides good-quality evidence that respiratory muscle training is effective in improving respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and functional capacity for patients with early stroke. Inspiratory muscle training combined with expiratory muscle training seems to promote functional recovery in patients with early stroke more than inspiratory muscle training alone. Prospero registration number: CRD42021291918.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸肌训练对早期中风患者呼吸功能和功能能力的影响:一项荟萃分析
呼吸肌训练是一种持续、标准化的呼吸肌训练,但对早期脑卒中患者的效果尚无明确证据。本荟萃分析旨在研究呼吸肌训练对早期卒中患者呼吸功能和功能能力的影响。从开始到 2023 年 12 月 8 日,在 PubMed、Embase、PEDro、ScienceDirect、AMED、CINAHL 和中国国家知网数据库中检索了有关以下研究的文章:1)年龄≥18 岁的脑卒中患者。2)呼吸肌训练,包括吸气肌训练和呼气肌训练;3)以下测量结果:呼吸肌力量、呼吸肌耐力、肺功能测试、呼吸困难疲劳评分和功能能力;4)随机对照试验。符合纳入标准的研究均提取了数据,并由两名独立审稿人使用物理治疗证据数据库量表和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对其方法学质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。RevMan 5.4 采用随机效应模型进行数据综合与分析。计算了平均差 (MD) 或标准平均差 (SMD) 以及 95% 置信区间 (95%CI)。九项研究符合纳入标准,共招募了 526 名参与者(平均年龄 61.6 岁)。呼吸肌训练对改善最大吸气压力(MD = 10.93,95%CI:8.51-13.36)、最大呼气压力(MD = 9.01,95%CI:5.34-12.69)、强迫生命容量(MD = 0.82,95%CI:0.54-1.10)、呼气峰流速(MD = 1.28,95%CI:0.94-1.63)、1 秒内用力呼气量(MD = 1.36,95%CI:1.13-1.59)、早期卒中患者的功能能力(SMD = 0.51,95%CI:0.05-0.98)。亚组分析显示,吸气肌训练联合呼气肌训练有利于最大吸气压(MD = 9.78,95%CI:5.96-13.60)、最大呼气压(MD = 11.62,95%CI:3.80-19.43)、强迫生命容量(MD = 0.87,95%CI:0.47-1.27)、呼气流量峰值(MD = 1.51,95%CI:1.22-1.80)、1 s 内强迫呼气量(MD = 0.76,95%CI:0.41-1.11)、功能容量(SMD = 0.61,95%CI:0.08-1.13),而吸气肌训练可改善最大吸气压力(MD = 11.60,95%CI:8.15-15.05)、最大呼气压力(MD = 7.06,95%CI:3.50-10.62)、用力肺活量(MD = 0.71,95%CI:0.21-1.21)、呼气峰流速(MD = 0.84,95%CI:0.37-1.31)、1 秒内用力呼气量(MD = 0.40,95%CI:0.08-0.72)。本研究提供了高质量的证据,证明呼吸肌训练能有效改善早期卒中患者的呼吸肌力量、肺功能和功能能力。与单纯的吸气肌训练相比,吸气肌训练结合呼气肌训练似乎更能促进早期卒中患者的功能恢复。Prospero 注册号:CRD42021291918。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
期刊最新文献
Can hypoxic exercise retard cellular senescence? A narrative review. 'Can do' versus 'Do do' in nursing home residents: identification of contextual factors discriminating groups with aligned or misaligned physical activity and physical capacity. Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed? Effectiveness of community-based Baduanjin exercise intervention for older adults with varying frailty status: a randomized controlled trial. Optimal lifestyle patterns for delaying ageing and reducing all-cause mortality: insights from the UK Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1