Benefits classification to enhance project value creation

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102574
Ofer Zwikael
{"title":"Benefits classification to enhance project value creation","authors":"Ofer Zwikael","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Projects create greater value when they realize their expected benefits. However, project benefits are often not fully realized, partly because managers find benefits an unclear concept that is difficult to identify, measure, and manage. As a result, various project benefits classification frameworks have been proposed to support managers from the project owner organization in setting the expected benefits before project commencement, managing the project, and evaluating benefits realization following project completion. However, the few existing frameworks include inconsistent, incomplete, and overlapping benefits groups. The objective of this paper is to develop a comprehensive project benefits classification framework to clarify the diverse benefits types and support their management. In an exploratory study, 30 interviews were conducted with senior executives, and in a second study, 173 real-life project benefits were analyzed. Findings from these two empirical studies suggest that project benefits can be classified into 10 groups based on their ultimate beneficiary (the final level of the beneficiary hierarchy): the project owner organization itself or the general public. More specifically, these benefits groups include seven groups of organizational benefits (revenue generation, cost savings, productivity enhancement, quality improvement, risk reduction, compliance, and learning) and three groups of public benefits (economic, social, and environmental). This classification enhances the setting, management, and evaluation of project benefits and advances our understanding of project value creation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"42 2","pages":"Article 102574"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000164/pdfft?md5=8fa08af3e88dba0843dc81a9925ddb00&pid=1-s2.0-S0263786324000164-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Projects create greater value when they realize their expected benefits. However, project benefits are often not fully realized, partly because managers find benefits an unclear concept that is difficult to identify, measure, and manage. As a result, various project benefits classification frameworks have been proposed to support managers from the project owner organization in setting the expected benefits before project commencement, managing the project, and evaluating benefits realization following project completion. However, the few existing frameworks include inconsistent, incomplete, and overlapping benefits groups. The objective of this paper is to develop a comprehensive project benefits classification framework to clarify the diverse benefits types and support their management. In an exploratory study, 30 interviews were conducted with senior executives, and in a second study, 173 real-life project benefits were analyzed. Findings from these two empirical studies suggest that project benefits can be classified into 10 groups based on their ultimate beneficiary (the final level of the beneficiary hierarchy): the project owner organization itself or the general public. More specifically, these benefits groups include seven groups of organizational benefits (revenue generation, cost savings, productivity enhancement, quality improvement, risk reduction, compliance, and learning) and three groups of public benefits (economic, social, and environmental). This classification enhances the setting, management, and evaluation of project benefits and advances our understanding of project value creation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效益分类,提高项目价值创造
项目在实现预期效益时会创造更大的价值。然而,项目效益往往得不到充分实现,部分原因是管理人员认为效益是一个不明确的概念,难以确定、衡量和管理。因此,人们提出了各种项目效益分类框架,以支持项目业主组织的管理人员在项目开始前设定预期效益、管理项目,以及在项目完成后评估效益实现情况。然而,现有的几个框架包括不一致、不完整和重叠的效益分组。本文旨在制定一个全面的项目效益分类框架,以明确不同的效益类型并支持其管理。在一项探索性研究中,对高级管理人员进行了 30 次访谈;在第二项研究中,对 173 个实际项目效益进行了分析。这两项实证研究的结果表明,项目效益可根据其最终受益人(受益人层次结构的最后一级)分为 10 组:项目业主组织本身或公众。更具体地说,这些效益组别包括七组组织效益(创收、成本节约、生产率提高、质量改进、风险降低、合规和学习)和三组公共效益(经济、社会和环境)。这种分类方法加强了项目效益的设定、管理和评估,并推进了我们对项目价值创造的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Struggling with strategizing in public client organisations: Managing strategic projects in inter-organisational contexts Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project Dynamics of multi-level programme integration in a strategic programme: The case of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1