Accuracy and stability analysis of horizontal discretizations used in unstructured grid ocean models

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Ocean Modelling Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102335
Fabricio Rodrigues Lapolli , Pedro da Silva Peixoto , Peter Korn
{"title":"Accuracy and stability analysis of horizontal discretizations used in unstructured grid ocean models","authors":"Fabricio Rodrigues Lapolli ,&nbsp;Pedro da Silva Peixoto ,&nbsp;Peter Korn","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One important tool at our disposal to evaluate the robustness of Global Circulation Models (GCMs) is to understand the horizontal discretization of the dynamical core under a shallow water approximation. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and stability of different methods used in, or adequate for, unstructured ocean models considering shallow water models. Our results show that the schemes have different accuracy capabilities, with the A- (NICAM) and B-grid (FeSOM 2.0) schemes providing at least 1st order accuracy in most operators and time integrated variables, while the two C-grid (ICON and MPAS) schemes display more difficulty in adequately approximating the horizontal dynamics. Moreover, the theory of the inertia-gravity wave representation on regular grids can be extended for our unstructured based schemes, where from least to most accurate we have: A-, B, and C-grid, respectively. Considering only C-grid schemes, the MPAS scheme has shown a more accurate representation of inertia-gravity waves than ICON. In terms of stability, we see that both A- and C-grid MPAS scheme display the best stability properties, but the A-grid scheme relies on artificial diffusion, while the C-grid scheme does not. Alongside, the B-grid and C-grid ICON schemes are within the least stable. Finally, in an effort to understand the effects of potential instabilities in ICON, we note that the full 3D model without a filtering term does not destabilize as it is integrated in time. However, spurious oscillations are responsible for decreasing the kinetic energy of the oceanic currents. Furthermore, an additional decrease of the currents’ turbulent kinetic energy is also observed, creating a spurious mixing, which also plays a role in the strength decrease of these oceanic currents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000222/pdfft?md5=9caf7e4ad314a4e6136390bd78ddafc7&pid=1-s2.0-S1463500324000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One important tool at our disposal to evaluate the robustness of Global Circulation Models (GCMs) is to understand the horizontal discretization of the dynamical core under a shallow water approximation. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and stability of different methods used in, or adequate for, unstructured ocean models considering shallow water models. Our results show that the schemes have different accuracy capabilities, with the A- (NICAM) and B-grid (FeSOM 2.0) schemes providing at least 1st order accuracy in most operators and time integrated variables, while the two C-grid (ICON and MPAS) schemes display more difficulty in adequately approximating the horizontal dynamics. Moreover, the theory of the inertia-gravity wave representation on regular grids can be extended for our unstructured based schemes, where from least to most accurate we have: A-, B, and C-grid, respectively. Considering only C-grid schemes, the MPAS scheme has shown a more accurate representation of inertia-gravity waves than ICON. In terms of stability, we see that both A- and C-grid MPAS scheme display the best stability properties, but the A-grid scheme relies on artificial diffusion, while the C-grid scheme does not. Alongside, the B-grid and C-grid ICON schemes are within the least stable. Finally, in an effort to understand the effects of potential instabilities in ICON, we note that the full 3D model without a filtering term does not destabilize as it is integrated in time. However, spurious oscillations are responsible for decreasing the kinetic energy of the oceanic currents. Furthermore, an additional decrease of the currents’ turbulent kinetic energy is also observed, creating a spurious mixing, which also plays a role in the strength decrease of these oceanic currents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非结构网格海洋模型所用水平离散法的精度和稳定性分析
评估全球环流模式(GCM)稳健性的一个重要工具是了解浅水近似条件下动态核心的水平离散。在此,我们评估了考虑到浅水模型的非结构化海洋模型中使用或适用的不同方法的准确性和稳定性。我们的结果表明,这些方案具有不同的精度能力,A 网格(NICAM)和 B 网格(FeSOM 2.0)方案在大多数算子和时间积分变量方面至少具有一阶精度,而两种 C 网格(ICON 和 MPAS)方案在充分近似水平动力学方面表现出更大的困难。此外,规则网格上的惯性-重力波表示理论可以扩展到我们的非结构化方案,从精度最低到最高,我们有从精确度最低到最高分别为:A 网格、B 网格和 C 网格。仅考虑 C 网格方案,MPAS 方案比 ICON 方案更精确地表示了惯性重力波。在稳定性方面,我们看到 A 网格和 C 网格 MPAS 方案都显示出最佳的稳定性,但 A 网格方案依赖于人工扩散,而 C 网格方案不依赖于人工扩散。同时,B 网格和 C 网格 ICON 方案的稳定性最差。最后,为了了解 ICON 中潜在不稳定性的影响,我们注意到不带滤波项的全三维模型在进行时间积分时不会失稳。然而,虚假振荡导致洋流动能下降。此外,我们还观测到洋流湍流动能的额外降低,从而产生了虚假混合,这也是这些洋流强度降低的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Storm surge modelling along European coastlines: The effect of the spatio-temporal resolution of the atmospheric forcing Editorial Board The effect of shallow water bathymetry on swash and surf zone modeled by SWASH Explainable AI in lengthening ENSO prediction from western north pacific precursor On warm bias and mesoscale dynamics setting the Southern Ocean large-scale circulation mean state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1