Quantitative review of probabilistic approaches to fatigue design in the medium cycle fatigue regime

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103589
Elvis Kufoin, Luca Susmel
{"title":"Quantitative review of probabilistic approaches to fatigue design in the medium cycle fatigue regime","authors":"Elvis Kufoin,&nbsp;Luca Susmel","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To quantify the fatigue behaviour of materials, a Wöhler diagram is required. The state of the art shows that, over the years, numerous approaches suitable for determining Wöhler curves have been devised and validated through large fatigue data sets. The variation in experimental fatigue data elicits the use of statistics for analysis and design purposes. By focusing on the medium-cycle fatigue regime (i.e., failures in the range 10<sup>3</sup>÷10<sup>7</sup> cycles to failure), this paper reviews relevant statistical approaches, particularly the methods suggested by the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) as well as the International Institute of Welding (IIW) and the so-called Linear Regression Method (LRM). Their responses were assessed on virtual data sets tailored to satisfy specific statistical requirements as well as experimental fatigue data sets from the literature. While the scatter bands at two times or less of the spread are similar for all approaches, the ASTM approach is seen to be the most conservative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 103589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024000110/pdfft?md5=da477b853e34a6c9a1c11bf8208e335c&pid=1-s2.0-S0266892024000110-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024000110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To quantify the fatigue behaviour of materials, a Wöhler diagram is required. The state of the art shows that, over the years, numerous approaches suitable for determining Wöhler curves have been devised and validated through large fatigue data sets. The variation in experimental fatigue data elicits the use of statistics for analysis and design purposes. By focusing on the medium-cycle fatigue regime (i.e., failures in the range 103÷107 cycles to failure), this paper reviews relevant statistical approaches, particularly the methods suggested by the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) as well as the International Institute of Welding (IIW) and the so-called Linear Regression Method (LRM). Their responses were assessed on virtual data sets tailored to satisfy specific statistical requirements as well as experimental fatigue data sets from the literature. While the scatter bands at two times or less of the spread are similar for all approaches, the ASTM approach is seen to be the most conservative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中等循环疲劳机制下疲劳设计概率方法的定量审查
为了量化材料的疲劳行为,需要绘制沃勒曲线图。最新技术表明,多年来已设计出许多适合确定沃勒曲线的方法,并通过大量疲劳数据集进行了验证。实验疲劳数据的变化促使人们使用统计数据进行分析和设计。通过重点关注中等循环疲劳机制(即失效循环次数在 103÷107 次之间),本文回顾了相关的统计方法,特别是美国材料试验协会 (ASTM) 和国际焊接学会 (IIW) 建议的方法以及所谓的线性回归法 (LRM)。对虚拟数据集以及文献中的实验疲劳数据集进行了评估,以满足特定的统计要求。虽然所有方法在两倍或更小范围内的散布带相似,但 ASTM 方法被认为是最保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
98
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.
期刊最新文献
Real-time anomaly detection of the stochastically excited systems on spherical (S2) manifold Nonprobabilistic time-dependent reliability analysis for uncertain structures under interval process loads Fractional-order filter approximations for efficient stochastic response determination of wind-excited linear structural systems Seismic reliability analysis using Subset Simulation enhanced with an explorative adaptive conditional sampling algorithm Efficient optimization-based method for simultaneous calibration of load and resistance factors considering multiple target reliability indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1