Evaluation of Fair Value Relevance and Sensitivity to Valuation Assumptions

Abacus Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1111/abac.12315
Le Ma, Peter Wells
{"title":"Evaluation of Fair Value Relevance and Sensitivity to Valuation Assumptions","authors":"Le Ma, Peter Wells","doi":"10.1111/abac.12315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates whether the relevance of investment properties measured using Level 3 inputs is impacted by the assumptions underpinning the determination of fair values. Evidence is provided of investors generally finding investment property fair values determined with Level 3 inputs to be relevant, and the values are not discounted in market price. However, this is not the case when there is evidence of firms using optimistic assumptions in the determination of fair values. Specifically, there is a material price discount of recognized investment property values as well as fair value gains for these observations. Our research setting of real estate investment firms has several advantages as these firms typically have as their major assets investment properties whose fair value and rental income can be observed from financial reports. This allows investors to easily infer and compare the key valuation assumptions as captured by the capitalization rate. The implication for more general circumstances where valuation assumptions cannot be inferred from financial reports is that detailed disclosures of assumptions are necessary for users to assess the reliability of fair values determined with Level 3 inputs.","PeriodicalId":501337,"journal":{"name":"Abacus","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates whether the relevance of investment properties measured using Level 3 inputs is impacted by the assumptions underpinning the determination of fair values. Evidence is provided of investors generally finding investment property fair values determined with Level 3 inputs to be relevant, and the values are not discounted in market price. However, this is not the case when there is evidence of firms using optimistic assumptions in the determination of fair values. Specifically, there is a material price discount of recognized investment property values as well as fair value gains for these observations. Our research setting of real estate investment firms has several advantages as these firms typically have as their major assets investment properties whose fair value and rental income can be observed from financial reports. This allows investors to easily infer and compare the key valuation assumptions as captured by the capitalization rate. The implication for more general circumstances where valuation assumptions cannot be inferred from financial reports is that detailed disclosures of assumptions are necessary for users to assess the reliability of fair values determined with Level 3 inputs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估公允价值的相关性和对估值假设的敏感性
本文评估了使用第三级输入值计量的投资性房地产的相关性是否会受到确定公允价值所依据的假设的影响。本文提供的证据表明,投资者普遍认为使用第三级输入值确定的投资性房地产公允价值是相关的,其价值不会被市场价格折现。但是,如果有证据表明公司在确定公允价值时使用了乐观的假设,情况就不是这样了。具体来说,在这些观察结果中,公认的投资性房地产价值以及公允价值收益都存在重大的价格折扣。我们以房地产投资公司为研究背景有几个优势,因为这些公司的主要资产通常是投资性房地产,其公允价值和租金收入可以从财务报告中观察到。这使得投资者可以很容易地推断和比较资本化率所反映的关键估值假设。对于无法从财务报告中推断估值假设的更一般情况,其影响是,用户有必要详细披露假设,以评估用第三级输入值确定的公允价值的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Analyze the Practical Relevance of Costing Methods? The Example of Hospital Cost Accounting in France Tone Management and Litigation Concerns in CEOs’ Early Years Does the Publication or the Implementation of IAS 19(R) Have Real Economic Consequences? Financial Resilience Perspective on COVID‐19 Business Support: A Comparative Study of Four European Countries Managerial Ability and Debt Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1