Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreatology Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.004
Hyunseok Yoon , Yeokyeong Shin , Baek-Yeol Ryoo , Hyehyun Jeong , Inkeun Park , Dong-Wan Seo , Sang Soo Lee , Do Hyun Park , Tae Jun Song , Dongwook Oh , Dae Wook Hwang , Jae Hoon Lee , Ki Byung Song , Yejong Park , Bong Jun Kwak , Seung-Mo Hong , Jin-hong Park , Song Cheol Kim , Kyu-pyo Kim , Changhoon Yoo
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma","authors":"Hyunseok Yoon ,&nbsp;Yeokyeong Shin ,&nbsp;Baek-Yeol Ryoo ,&nbsp;Hyehyun Jeong ,&nbsp;Inkeun Park ,&nbsp;Dong-Wan Seo ,&nbsp;Sang Soo Lee ,&nbsp;Do Hyun Park ,&nbsp;Tae Jun Song ,&nbsp;Dongwook Oh ,&nbsp;Dae Wook Hwang ,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Lee ,&nbsp;Ki Byung Song ,&nbsp;Yejong Park ,&nbsp;Bong Jun Kwak ,&nbsp;Seung-Mo Hong ,&nbsp;Jin-hong Park ,&nbsp;Song Cheol Kim ,&nbsp;Kyu-pyo Kim ,&nbsp;Changhoon Yoo","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3–47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX—locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX.

Methods

Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed.

Results

With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3–47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX—locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy.

Conclusions

The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线改良 FOLFIRINOX 治疗边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺腺癌疾病进展后二线治疗的临床疗效
背景改良FOLFIRINOX(mFOLFIRINOX)是边界可切除胰腺癌(BRPC)和局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌(LAPC)的标准一线疗法之一。本回顾性分析纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受一线 mFOLFIRINOX 治疗的 BRPC 和 LAPC 患者(n = 647)。结果中位随访时间为44.2个月(95%置信区间[CI],42.3-47.6),322名患者在接受mFOLFIRINOX治疗后出现疾病进展--仅177名患者(55.0%)出现局部进展,145名患者(45.0%)出现远处转移。局部进展组的进展后生存期(PPS)明显长于远处转移组(10.1 个月对 7.3 个月,P = 0.002)。在局部进展组中,二线化疗/放疗和全身化疗的生存结果没有差异(二线治疗无进展生存期[PFS-2],3.2 个月对 4.3 个月;P = 0.649;PPS,10.7 个月对 10.2 个月;P = 0.791)。在 mFOLFIRINOX 治疗进展后接受二线系统化疗的患者中(n = 211),吉西他滨联合纳布紫杉醇与更好的疾病控制率(69.2% vs. 42.3%,p = 0.005)和 PFS-2 相关(3.2 个月 vs. 4.3 个月;p = 0.649;PPS,10.7 个月 vs. 10.2 个月;p = 0.791)。结论目前的研究显示了 BRPC 和 LAPC 一线 mFOLFIRINOX 治疗进展后的后续治疗模式和临床结果。有必要开展进一步研究,以确定 mFOLFIRINOX 治疗失败后的最佳治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
期刊最新文献
Timing of lumen-apposing metal stents removal in pancreatic fluid collections: Could we go beyond? Risk score to predict inpatient mortality of acute pancreatitis patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Response to "Evaluation of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction scales following pancreatoduodenectomies based on magnetic resonance imaging: A diagnostic test study". Prescribing of pancreatic enzyme therapy for malabsorption in unresectable pancreatic cancer: Cross-sectional survey across New Zealand and Australia. Clinical significance and therapeutic implication of CD200 in pancreatic cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1