Long-term prognosis and prognostic factors after primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.02.006
{"title":"Long-term prognosis and prognostic factors after primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Little is known regarding which patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy<span><span> (ICM) should be considered for prophylactic therapies, such as an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), in the primary percutaneous intervention<span> era. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on </span></span>major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in </span></span>heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed patients of ICM and non-ICM who underwent ICD implantation at our institute from October 2006 to August 2020. MACE were defined as composite outcome of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, and appropriate ICD therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span><span>A total of 167 patients were enrolled [male, 138 (83 %); age, 62.1 ± 11.7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 23.5 ± 6.1 %; left ventricular diastolic diameter, 67.4 ± 9.0 mm; </span>atrial fibrillation, 47 (28 %); NSVT, 124 (74 %); use of class III </span>antiarrhythmic drugs<span>, 55 (33 %); ischemic cardiomyopathy, 56 (34 %); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (44 %)]. The median follow-up duration was 61 months. MACE occurred with 71 patients (43 %). When comparing baseline characteristics of the patients, left ventricular ejection fraction (</span></span><em>p</em> = 0.02) and atrial fibrillation (<em>p</em> = 0.04) were significantly associated with MACE. The multivariable Cox analysis for the target variable MACE identified atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio 2.00; 95 % confidence index 1.18–3.37; <em>p</em> = 0.01) as an independent predictor for MACE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prior NSVT before ICD implantation was not an independent predictor of future MACE in patients with HFrEF with primary prophylactic ICD. In contrast, atrial fibrillation was associated with worse prognosis. To predict the prognosis of patients with primary prophylactic ICD, these factors should be assessed as comprehensive risk stratification factors for MACE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"84 3","pages":"Pages 170-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508724000248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known regarding which patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) should be considered for prophylactic therapies, such as an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), in the primary percutaneous intervention era. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients of ICM and non-ICM who underwent ICD implantation at our institute from October 2006 to August 2020. MACE were defined as composite outcome of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, and appropriate ICD therapies.

Results

A total of 167 patients were enrolled [male, 138 (83 %); age, 62.1 ± 11.7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 23.5 ± 6.1 %; left ventricular diastolic diameter, 67.4 ± 9.0 mm; atrial fibrillation, 47 (28 %); NSVT, 124 (74 %); use of class III antiarrhythmic drugs, 55 (33 %); ischemic cardiomyopathy, 56 (34 %); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (44 %)]. The median follow-up duration was 61 months. MACE occurred with 71 patients (43 %). When comparing baseline characteristics of the patients, left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.02) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with MACE. The multivariable Cox analysis for the target variable MACE identified atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio 2.00; 95 % confidence index 1.18–3.37; p = 0.01) as an independent predictor for MACE.

Conclusions

Prior NSVT before ICD implantation was not an independent predictor of future MACE in patients with HFrEF with primary prophylactic ICD. In contrast, atrial fibrillation was associated with worse prognosis. To predict the prognosis of patients with primary prophylactic ICD, these factors should be assessed as comprehensive risk stratification factors for MACE.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级预防性植入式心律转复除颤器治疗后的长期预后和预后因素
在初级经皮介入治疗时代,哪些缺血性心肌病(ICM)患者应考虑接受预防性治疗,如植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),人们对此知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨非持续性室性心动过速(NSVT)对射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的影响。我们对 2006 年 10 月至 2020 年 8 月期间在我院接受 ICD 植入术的 ICM 和非 ICM 患者进行了回顾性分析。MACE定义为心血管死亡、心衰住院和适当ICD治疗的复合结果。共纳入 167 名患者[男性,138 人(83%);年龄,62.1 ± 11.7 岁;左室射血分数,23.5 ± 6.1%;左室舒张直径,67.4 ± 9.0毫米;心房颤动,47(28%);NSVT,124(74%);使用III类抗心律失常药物,55(33%);缺血性心肌病,56(34%);心脏再同步化治疗,73(44%)]。中位随访时间为 61 个月。71名患者(43%)发生了MACE。在比较患者的基线特征时,左心室射血分数(= 0.02)和心房颤动(= 0.04)与 MACE 显著相关。针对目标变量 MACE 的多变量 Cox 分析发现,心房颤动(危险比 2.00;95% 置信度指数 1.18-3.37;= 0.01)是 MACE 的独立预测因子。在植入 ICD 前曾发生过 NSVT 并不能独立预测使用一级预防性 ICD 的 HFrEF 患者未来的 MACE。相反,心房颤动与较差的预后有关。为了预测原发性预防性 ICD 患者的预后,应将这些因素作为 MACE 的综合风险分层因素进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in super-old and old aged patients in an advanced aging society. The effect of circumferential and longitudinal strain on left ventricle ejection fraction and myocardial surface area strain. Authors' reply. Usefulness of intraoperative color three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for detecting treatable residual mitral regurgitation immediately after mitral valve repair. Validation of artificial intelligence-based application to estimate nutrients in daily meals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1