Finding climate smart agriculture in civil-society initiatives

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s11027-024-10108-6
Federico Davila, Brent Jacobs, Faisal Nadeem, Rob Kelly, Nami Kurimoto
{"title":"Finding climate smart agriculture in civil-society initiatives","authors":"Federico Davila, Brent Jacobs, Faisal Nadeem, Rob Kelly, Nami Kurimoto","doi":"10.1007/s11027-024-10108-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>International civil society and non-government organisations (NGOs) play a role in implementing agricultural projects, which contribute to the mitigation, adaptation, and food security dimensions of climate-smart agriculture (CSA). Despite the growth of CSA, it remains unclear how CSA is designed, conceptualised, and embedded into agricultural development projects led and implemented by NGOs, creating a lack of clarity as to the direction of future of agricultural development interventions. This paper examines the extent to which development programmes from the NGO sector actively incorporate CSA principles to benefit smallholder farmers under the major pillars of CSA. Drawing from six projects’ documentation since 2009, we conducted a thematic analysis to reveal the alignment of projects with the pillars of CSA and discuss the extent to which CSA allows for localised adaptability given the diverse agricultural contexts in which civil society and NGOs work. We find that despite a lack of clarity in CSA definition and focus, the agricultural practices in the six projects make heterogenous contributions to the adoption of CSA principles. We illustrate the diversity of ways in which CSA is ‘done’ by a global NGO across six areas: greening and forests, practices and knowledge exchange, markets, policy and institutions, nutrition, carbon and climate, and gender. We discuss the need for balance in contextual adaptability across the three pillars of CSA with explicit consideration of trade-offs to reduce unintended outcomes from CSA initiatives. We conclude with reflections on the role of civil society and NGOs as boundary agents in the agricultural development sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10108-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International civil society and non-government organisations (NGOs) play a role in implementing agricultural projects, which contribute to the mitigation, adaptation, and food security dimensions of climate-smart agriculture (CSA). Despite the growth of CSA, it remains unclear how CSA is designed, conceptualised, and embedded into agricultural development projects led and implemented by NGOs, creating a lack of clarity as to the direction of future of agricultural development interventions. This paper examines the extent to which development programmes from the NGO sector actively incorporate CSA principles to benefit smallholder farmers under the major pillars of CSA. Drawing from six projects’ documentation since 2009, we conducted a thematic analysis to reveal the alignment of projects with the pillars of CSA and discuss the extent to which CSA allows for localised adaptability given the diverse agricultural contexts in which civil society and NGOs work. We find that despite a lack of clarity in CSA definition and focus, the agricultural practices in the six projects make heterogenous contributions to the adoption of CSA principles. We illustrate the diversity of ways in which CSA is ‘done’ by a global NGO across six areas: greening and forests, practices and knowledge exchange, markets, policy and institutions, nutrition, carbon and climate, and gender. We discuss the need for balance in contextual adaptability across the three pillars of CSA with explicit consideration of trade-offs to reduce unintended outcomes from CSA initiatives. We conclude with reflections on the role of civil society and NGOs as boundary agents in the agricultural development sector.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在民间社会倡议中寻找气候智能型农业
国际民间社会和非政府组织(NGOs)在实施农业项目方面发挥着作用,这些项目有助于气候智能型农业(CSA)的减缓、适应和粮食安全。尽管 "气候智慧型农业 "在不断发展,但如何设计 "气候智慧型农业"、将其概念化并将其纳入非政府组织领导和实施的农业发展项目中,目前仍不明确,这导致农业发展干预措施的未来方向不清晰。本文探讨了非政府组织部门的发展项目在多大程度上积极纳入了 CSA 原则,以在 CSA 的主要支柱下造福小农。根据 2009 年以来六个项目的文件,我们进行了专题分析,以揭示项目与 CSA 支柱的一致性,并讨论 CSA 在多大程度上允许民间社会和非政府组织在不同的农业背景下进行本地化调整。我们发现,尽管 CSA 的定义和重点不够明确,但六个项目中的农业实践对 CSA 原则的采用做出了不同的贡献。我们说明了一个全球性非政府组织在以下六个领域 "实施" CSA 的方式的多样性:绿化和森林、实践和知识交流、市场、政策和机构、营养、碳和气候以及性别。我们讨论了在 CSA 的三大支柱中平衡环境适应性的必要性,并明确考虑了权衡取舍,以减少 CSA 举措的意外结果。最后,我们对民间社会和非政府组织作为农业发展部门的边界代理人的作用进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management. Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.
期刊最新文献
Trends in climate adaptation solutions for mountain regions Social networks can mitigate climate change-related food insecurity risks in dryland farming systems in Ghana Biochar-enhanced soilless farming: a sustainable solution for modern agriculture Exploiting time zone differences to harmonize electricity supplies: case study of the Central Asian Region Russia on the pathways to carbon neutrality: forks on roadmaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1