Patients with infusion-related reactions on fixed-dose rituximab treatment have higher body surface area than those without infusion-related reactions in adults with frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective study.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1186/s40780-024-00334-0
Hironobu Nishiura, Masaya Takahashi, Katsuhito Mori, Takashi Sugimoto, Masanori Emoto, Yasutaka Nakamura
{"title":"Patients with infusion-related reactions on fixed-dose rituximab treatment have higher body surface area than those without infusion-related reactions in adults with frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective study.","authors":"Hironobu Nishiura, Masaya Takahashi, Katsuhito Mori, Takashi Sugimoto, Masanori Emoto, Yasutaka Nakamura","doi":"10.1186/s40780-024-00334-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are major side effects of rituximab administration. Male sex, high body weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index are predictive markers of rituximab-induced IRRs. However, as rituximab was not administered at a fixed dosage in a previous study, whether a higher dosage or factors associated with a larger physique are more strongly associated with rituximab-induced IRRs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Thirteen adults with frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) who received an initial rituximab dose of 500 mg between September 2015 and November 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Data on IRRs were collected from medical records. The incidence of rituximab-induced IRRs was 38.5% (5/13). The IRR group had a significantly higher BSA than the non-IRR group (median, 1.86 vs. 1.48 m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.045). Additionally, rituximab dosage normalized by BSA in the IRR group was significantly lower than that in the non-IRR group (median, 268.8 vs. 337.9 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed that adults with frequently relapsing MCNS who experienced IRRs tend to have a higher BSA, even with fixed-dose rituximab treatment. Therefore, when patients with higher BSA receive rituximab treatment, clinicians should be careful about monitoring patient condition whether the dosage is fixed or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00334-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are major side effects of rituximab administration. Male sex, high body weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index are predictive markers of rituximab-induced IRRs. However, as rituximab was not administered at a fixed dosage in a previous study, whether a higher dosage or factors associated with a larger physique are more strongly associated with rituximab-induced IRRs is unknown.

Main body: Thirteen adults with frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) who received an initial rituximab dose of 500 mg between September 2015 and November 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Data on IRRs were collected from medical records. The incidence of rituximab-induced IRRs was 38.5% (5/13). The IRR group had a significantly higher BSA than the non-IRR group (median, 1.86 vs. 1.48 m2; p = 0.045). Additionally, rituximab dosage normalized by BSA in the IRR group was significantly lower than that in the non-IRR group (median, 268.8 vs. 337.9 mg/m2; p = 0.045).

Conclusions: Our study revealed that adults with frequently relapsing MCNS who experienced IRRs tend to have a higher BSA, even with fixed-dose rituximab treatment. Therefore, when patients with higher BSA receive rituximab treatment, clinicians should be careful about monitoring patient condition whether the dosage is fixed or not.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项回顾性研究:在经常复发的微小病变肾病综合征成人患者中,接受固定剂量利妥昔单抗治疗后出现输液相关反应的患者的体表面积高于未出现输液相关反应的患者。
背景输液相关反应(IRR)是利妥昔单抗用药的主要副作用。男性、高体重、体表面积(BSA)和体重指数是利妥昔单抗引起输液相关反应的预测指标。然而,由于在之前的一项研究中,利妥昔单抗的用药剂量并不固定,因此,用药剂量越大或体型越大的相关因素是否与利妥昔单抗诱发的IRR有更强的关联尚不清楚:对2015年9月至2022年11月期间接受初始剂量为500毫克利妥昔单抗治疗的13名经常复发的肾病综合征(MCNS)成人患者进行了回顾性评估。IRR数据来自医疗记录。利妥昔单抗引起的IRR发生率为38.5%(5/13)。IRR组的BSA明显高于非IRR组(中位数为1.86平方米对1.48平方米;P = 0.045)。此外,IRR组的利妥昔单抗剂量按BSA归一化后明显低于非IRR组(中位数,268.8 vs. 337.9 mg/m2; p = 0.045):我们的研究显示,频繁复发的成人 MCNS 患者在经历 IRR 后,即使接受固定剂量利妥昔单抗治疗,其 BSA 也往往较高。因此,当 BSA 较高的患者接受利妥昔单抗治疗时,无论剂量是否固定,临床医生都应注意监测患者的病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compatibility of hypokalaemia caused by low-dose prednisolone plus abiraterone acetate therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A qualitative study on the current status and problems of pharmacists in home healthcare from the viewpoint of care managers in medically underpopulated areas in Japan. Effects of famotidine use during pregnancy: an observational cohort study. Development and validation of the prediction score for augmented renal clearance in critically Ill Japanese adults. Investigating the hypothermic effects of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials on non-bacterial fever model mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1