Radiographic bone loss around dental implants: a large-cohort, long-term follow-up revealing prevalence and predictive factors.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b5013287
David French, Danielle Clark-Perry, Ronen Ofec, Liran Levin
{"title":"Radiographic bone loss around dental implants: a large-cohort, long-term follow-up revealing prevalence and predictive factors.","authors":"David French, Danielle Clark-Perry, Ronen Ofec, Liran Levin","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5013287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed radiographic bone levels of 10,871 dental implants in a cohort of 4,247 patients over a 22-year period. The objectives of the study were to assess and explore risk factors associated with the radiographic bone level of dental implants.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>A longitudinal observational cohort study based on data collected from 1995 to 2019 was conducted on implants placed by a single periodontist. Inclusion criteria included both partially and fully edentulous sites. Exclusion criteria were patients who were considered ASA 3 or greater. Information on medical and dental status prior to implant placement such as diabetes and smoking were included in the analysis. Implant factors such as the implant characteristics (length and diameter) and surgical site were recorded. The outcome assessed was the prevalence of bone loss around implants and any associative factors related to the bone loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, dental implants lost an average of 0.05 ± 0.38 mm of bone 2 to 3 years after placement and 0.21 ± 0.64 mm 8 years after placement. The soft tissue condition was evaluated using the Implant Mucosal Index (IMI), and bone loss around dental implants was significantly higher when bleeding on probing was multi-point and moderate, multi-point and profuse, and when infection with suppuration was recorded. The mean difference in bone level between smokers and nonsmokers was 0.26 mm (P < .01) over a 4-year period. A mean difference of 0.10 mm (P = .04) in bone loss over 4 years was found between those with an autoimmune disease compared to those without. The diameter of the implant and immediate loading of the dental implant did not influence the radiographic bone levels over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large dataset of dental implants highlights predictive risk factors for bone loss around dental implants and the impact these risk factors have on the implant bone level. Consideration of these risk factors by both the dental team and the patient prior to dental implant placement will promote success of the treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"296-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5013287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study analyzed radiographic bone levels of 10,871 dental implants in a cohort of 4,247 patients over a 22-year period. The objectives of the study were to assess and explore risk factors associated with the radiographic bone level of dental implants.

Method and materials: A longitudinal observational cohort study based on data collected from 1995 to 2019 was conducted on implants placed by a single periodontist. Inclusion criteria included both partially and fully edentulous sites. Exclusion criteria were patients who were considered ASA 3 or greater. Information on medical and dental status prior to implant placement such as diabetes and smoking were included in the analysis. Implant factors such as the implant characteristics (length and diameter) and surgical site were recorded. The outcome assessed was the prevalence of bone loss around implants and any associative factors related to the bone loss.

Results: Overall, dental implants lost an average of 0.05 ± 0.38 mm of bone 2 to 3 years after placement and 0.21 ± 0.64 mm 8 years after placement. The soft tissue condition was evaluated using the Implant Mucosal Index (IMI), and bone loss around dental implants was significantly higher when bleeding on probing was multi-point and moderate, multi-point and profuse, and when infection with suppuration was recorded. The mean difference in bone level between smokers and nonsmokers was 0.26 mm (P < .01) over a 4-year period. A mean difference of 0.10 mm (P = .04) in bone loss over 4 years was found between those with an autoimmune disease compared to those without. The diameter of the implant and immediate loading of the dental implant did not influence the radiographic bone levels over time.

Conclusions: This large dataset of dental implants highlights predictive risk factors for bone loss around dental implants and the impact these risk factors have on the implant bone level. Consideration of these risk factors by both the dental team and the patient prior to dental implant placement will promote success of the treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科植入物周围的放射性骨质流失:一项大型队列长期跟踪调查揭示了流行率和预测因素。
背景:这项回顾性研究分析了 22 年间 4247 名患者中 10871 个牙科植入物的放射骨水平。研究目的是评估和探讨与牙科植入物放射骨水平相关的风险因素:一项纵向观察队列研究基于 1995 年至 2019 年收集的数据,研究对象是由一名牙周病医生植入的种植体。纳入标准包括部分缺牙和完全缺牙部位。排除标准是ASA 3级或以上的患者。分析还包括植入种植体前的医疗和牙科状况信息,如糖尿病和吸烟。种植体特征(长度和直径)和手术部位等种植体因素也被记录在案。评估的结果是种植体周围骨质流失的发生率以及与骨质流失相关的任何因素:总体而言,牙科种植体植入 2-3 年后平均骨质流失 0.05±0.38mm,植入 8 年后平均骨质流失 0.21±0.64mm。使用种植体粘膜指数(IMI)对软组织状况进行评估,当探诊出血为多点中度出血、多点大量出血以及感染化脓时,种植体周围的骨量损失明显较高。吸烟者和非吸烟者的骨量平均相差 0.26 毫米(PConclusions):这组关于牙科种植体的大型数据突出显示了牙科种植体周围骨质流失的预测性风险因素,以及这些风险因素对种植体骨质水平的影响。牙科团队和患者在种植牙前考虑这些风险因素将有助于治疗的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Complications and risk factors associated with zygomatic implants: retrospective analysis with 73 consecutive patients followed for 3.5 years. Computer-assisted contouring combined with bone ostectomy for dental implant placement of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia involving the right maxilla. Musculoskeletal pain is associated with poor sleep quality and increased daytime sleepiness in dental students: a cross-sectional pilot study. Comparison of two treatment modalities in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial. The effects of photobiomodulation and/or azithromycin treatment on bone resorption biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid from patients with stage III-IV grade C periodontitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1