Anxiety and depression in patients with giant cell arteritis.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae013
Joana Martins-Martinho, André Ponte, Eduardo Dourado, Nikita Khmelinskii, Sofia C Barreira, Ana R Cruz-Machado, Carla Macieira, Vítor Teixeira, Ana M Rodrigues, Diogo Telles-Correia, João E Fonseca, Cristina Ponte
{"title":"Anxiety and depression in patients with giant cell arteritis.","authors":"Joana Martins-Martinho, André Ponte, Eduardo Dourado, Nikita Khmelinskii, Sofia C Barreira, Ana R Cruz-Machado, Carla Macieira, Vítor Teixeira, Ana M Rodrigues, Diogo Telles-Correia, João E Fonseca, Cristina Ponte","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with GCA with that in the general population, using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and to identify independent predictors of these psychiatric manifestations in patients with GCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study including all patients diagnosed with GCA followed during 1 year in a vasculitis outpatient clinic. The HADS and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires were prospectively collected. Patients' HADS results were compared with an age- and gender-matched control group. HADS anxiety (HADS-A) and HADS depression (HADS-D) scores between 8 and 10 defined possible anxiety and depression and ≥11 defined probable anxiety and depression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 72 patients and 288 controls. Compared with controls, patients with GCA had a statistically significant higher prevalence of HADS-A ≥8 (48.6% <i>vs</i> 26.4%), HADS-A ≥11 (30.6% <i>vs</i> 12.2%) and HADS-D ≥11 (33.3% <i>vs</i> 18.1%). GCA was an independent predictor of HADS-A ≥8 [odds ratio (OR) 3.3 (95% CI 1.9, 5.9)], HADS-A ≥11 [OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.0, 7.4)] and HADS-D ≥11 [OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.4, 4.7)]. Among patients with GCA, a negative correlation was observed between HADS-A/D and SF-36 mental health scores (<i>r</i> = -0.780 and <i>r</i> = -0.742, respectively). Glucocorticoid therapy was a predictor of HADS-A ≥8 [OR 10.4 (95% CI 1.2, 94.2)] and older age of HADS-D ≥8 [OR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1, 1.3)] and HADS-D ≥11 [OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0, 1.2)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the general population, patients with GCA have a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression and GCA is an independent predictor of these symptoms. Glucocorticoid treatment and older age are predictors of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"rkae013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with GCA with that in the general population, using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and to identify independent predictors of these psychiatric manifestations in patients with GCA.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including all patients diagnosed with GCA followed during 1 year in a vasculitis outpatient clinic. The HADS and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires were prospectively collected. Patients' HADS results were compared with an age- and gender-matched control group. HADS anxiety (HADS-A) and HADS depression (HADS-D) scores between 8 and 10 defined possible anxiety and depression and ≥11 defined probable anxiety and depression, respectively.

Results: We included 72 patients and 288 controls. Compared with controls, patients with GCA had a statistically significant higher prevalence of HADS-A ≥8 (48.6% vs 26.4%), HADS-A ≥11 (30.6% vs 12.2%) and HADS-D ≥11 (33.3% vs 18.1%). GCA was an independent predictor of HADS-A ≥8 [odds ratio (OR) 3.3 (95% CI 1.9, 5.9)], HADS-A ≥11 [OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.0, 7.4)] and HADS-D ≥11 [OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.4, 4.7)]. Among patients with GCA, a negative correlation was observed between HADS-A/D and SF-36 mental health scores (r = -0.780 and r = -0.742, respectively). Glucocorticoid therapy was a predictor of HADS-A ≥8 [OR 10.4 (95% CI 1.2, 94.2)] and older age of HADS-D ≥8 [OR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1, 1.3)] and HADS-D ≥11 [OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0, 1.2)].

Conclusions: Compared with the general population, patients with GCA have a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression and GCA is an independent predictor of these symptoms. Glucocorticoid treatment and older age are predictors of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with GCA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨细胞动脉炎患者的焦虑和抑郁。
研究目的使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)比较 GCA 患者与普通人群中焦虑和抑郁的发生率,并确定 GCA 患者出现这些精神表现的独立预测因素:我们进行了一项横断面研究,包括在脉管炎门诊随访一年的所有确诊为 GCA 的患者。前瞻性地收集了 HADS 和 36 项短表 (SF-36) 问卷。患者的 HADS 结果与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了比较。HADS焦虑(HADS-A)和HADS抑郁(HADS-D)得分在8-10分之间分别定义为可能的焦虑和抑郁,≥11分定义为可能的焦虑和抑郁:我们纳入了 72 名患者和 288 名对照组。与对照组相比,GCA 患者 HADS-A≥8 分(48.6% vs 26.4%)、HADS-A≥11 分(30.6% vs 12.2%)和 HADS-D≥11 分(33.3% vs 18.1%)的患病率显著高于对照组。GCA 是 HADS-A≥8 [odds ratio (OR) 3.3 (95% CI 1.9, 5.9)]、HADS-A ≥11 [OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.0, 7.4)]和 HADS-D ≥11 [OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.4, 4.7)]的独立预测因素。在 GCA 患者中,HADS-A/D 和 SF-36 心理健康评分之间呈负相关(分别为 r = -0.780 和 r = -0.742)。糖皮质激素治疗是HADS-A≥8[OR 10.4 (95% CI 1.2, 94.2)]和HADS-D≥8[OR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1, 1.3)]及HADS-D≥11[OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0, 1.2)]年龄较大的预测因素:与普通人群相比,GCA 患者焦虑和抑郁的发生率更高,GCA 是这些症状的独立预测因素。糖皮质激素治疗和年龄较大分别是预测 GCA 患者焦虑和抑郁的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pain management in people with inflammatory arthritis: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope. CONTExT-RA: a cross-sectional study evaluating disease activity, quality of life and the socio-demographic profile of Irish patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Recording of non-musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and safety outcomes in European spondyloarthritis registries: a survey. Intramuscular methylprednisolone in hand osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study. Scleroderma renal crisis, an increasingly rare but persistently challenging condition: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1