Using rodent data to elucidate dopaminergic mechanisms of ADHD: Implications for human personality.

Q3 Medicine Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2023.12
Gail Tripp, Jeff Wickens
{"title":"Using rodent data to elucidate dopaminergic mechanisms of ADHD: Implications for human personality.","authors":"Gail Tripp, Jeff Wickens","doi":"10.1017/pen.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An altered behavioral response to positive reinforcement has been proposed to be a core deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), a congenic animal strain, displays a similarly altered response to reinforcement. The presence of this genetically determined phenotype in a rodent model allows experimental investigation of underlying neural mechanisms. Behaviorally, the SHR displays increased preference for immediate reinforcement, increased sensitivity to individual instances of reinforcement relative to integrated reinforcement history, and a steeper delay of reinforcement gradient compared to other rat strains. The SHR also shows less development of incentive to approach sensory stimuli, or cues, that predict reward after repeated cue-reward pairing. We consider the underlying neural mechanisms for these characteristics. It is well known that midbrain dopamine neurons are initially activated by unexpected reward and gradually transfer their responses to reward-predicting cues. This finding has inspired the dopamine transfer deficit (DTD) hypothesis, which predicts certain behavioral effects that would arise from a deficient transfer of dopamine responses from actual rewards to reward-predicting cues. We argue that the DTD predicts the altered responses to reinforcement seen in the SHR and individuals with ADHD. These altered responses to reinforcement in turn predict core symptoms of ADHD. We also suggest that variations in the degree of dopamine transfer may underlie variations in personality dimensions related to altered reinforcement sensitivity. In doing so, we highlight the value of rodent models to the study of human personality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"7 ","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10877278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An altered behavioral response to positive reinforcement has been proposed to be a core deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), a congenic animal strain, displays a similarly altered response to reinforcement. The presence of this genetically determined phenotype in a rodent model allows experimental investigation of underlying neural mechanisms. Behaviorally, the SHR displays increased preference for immediate reinforcement, increased sensitivity to individual instances of reinforcement relative to integrated reinforcement history, and a steeper delay of reinforcement gradient compared to other rat strains. The SHR also shows less development of incentive to approach sensory stimuli, or cues, that predict reward after repeated cue-reward pairing. We consider the underlying neural mechanisms for these characteristics. It is well known that midbrain dopamine neurons are initially activated by unexpected reward and gradually transfer their responses to reward-predicting cues. This finding has inspired the dopamine transfer deficit (DTD) hypothesis, which predicts certain behavioral effects that would arise from a deficient transfer of dopamine responses from actual rewards to reward-predicting cues. We argue that the DTD predicts the altered responses to reinforcement seen in the SHR and individuals with ADHD. These altered responses to reinforcement in turn predict core symptoms of ADHD. We also suggest that variations in the degree of dopamine transfer may underlie variations in personality dimensions related to altered reinforcement sensitivity. In doing so, we highlight the value of rodent models to the study of human personality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用啮齿动物数据阐明多巴胺能多动症机制:对人类人格的影响。
正强化行为反应的改变被认为是注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的核心缺陷。自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)是一种先天性动物品系,对强化的反应也有类似的改变。在啮齿动物模型中出现这种由基因决定的表型,有助于对潜在的神经机制进行实验研究。在行为上,与其他大鼠品系相比,SHR 对即时强化的偏好增加,对单个强化实例的敏感性相对于综合强化历史增加,强化梯度的延迟更陡峭。此外,SHR 还表现出对接近感官刺激或线索的动机发展较弱,而这些刺激或线索在重复线索-奖赏配对后可预测奖赏。我们考虑了这些特征的潜在神经机制。众所周知,中脑多巴胺神经元最初会被意外奖赏激活,并逐渐将其反应转移到奖赏预测线索上。这一发现启发了多巴胺转移缺陷(DTD)假说,该假说预测了多巴胺反应从实际奖赏到奖赏预测线索的转移不足所产生的某些行为效应。我们认为,DTD 预测了 SHR 和多动症患者对强化反应的改变。这些强化反应的改变反过来又预测了多动症的核心症状。我们还认为,多巴胺转移程度的变化可能是与强化敏感性改变有关的人格维度变化的基础。因此,我们强调了啮齿动物模型对人类人格研究的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jaak Panksepp's primary emotions are associated with Diener's global life satisfaction: How low arousal of the SADNESS/separation distress system could form the core of life satisfaction? Reduced MMN-indexed auditory change detection in a non-clinical high schizotypy sample. Are you how you eat? Aspects of self-awareness in eating disorders. Midfrontal theta reactivity to conflict and error are linked to externalizing and internalizing respectively. Midfrontal conflict theta and parietal P300 are linked to a latent factor of DSM externalising disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1