Is there a basis for a weight cut-off point? A large-scale investigation of atypical anorexia and anorexia nervosa subtypes among patients at a residential treatment centre

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Eating Disorders Review Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1002/erv.3077
Valerie Z. Wong, Michael R. Lowe
{"title":"Is there a basis for a weight cut-off point? A large-scale investigation of atypical anorexia and anorexia nervosa subtypes among patients at a residential treatment centre","authors":"Valerie Z. Wong,&nbsp;Michael R. Lowe","doi":"10.1002/erv.3077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>There is debate surrounding how to differentiate between anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN (atypAN) as diagnostic entities, and whether a distinction based on BMI is warranted. Better understanding eating disorder (ED) and emotional symptoms across atypAN and AN subtypes [AN-restricting (AN-R), AN-binge/purge (AN-BP)], with and without controlling for BMI, can elucidate how atypAN differs from AN subtypes and whether there is a basis for a BMI cut-off.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>1810 female patients at an ED treatment centre completed intake surveys. ANCOVAs assessed differences across AN-R (<i>n</i> = 853), AN-BP (<i>n</i> = 726), and atypAN (<i>n</i> = 231) groups on ED, depressive, and anxiety symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and mindfulness, with and without controlling for BMI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Relative to AN-R, atypAN and AN-BP groups endorsed significantly higher ED and depressive symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and significantly lower mindfulness (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but atypAN and AN-BP groups did not differ from one another. When controlling for BMI, all previously significant differences between atypAN and AN-R did not remain significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with atypAN who have a higher BMI experience more pronounced ED and emotional symptoms, suggesting that relying solely on BMI as a marker of illness severity may be problematic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"32 4","pages":"641-651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

There is debate surrounding how to differentiate between anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN (atypAN) as diagnostic entities, and whether a distinction based on BMI is warranted. Better understanding eating disorder (ED) and emotional symptoms across atypAN and AN subtypes [AN-restricting (AN-R), AN-binge/purge (AN-BP)], with and without controlling for BMI, can elucidate how atypAN differs from AN subtypes and whether there is a basis for a BMI cut-off.

Methods

1810 female patients at an ED treatment centre completed intake surveys. ANCOVAs assessed differences across AN-R (n = 853), AN-BP (n = 726), and atypAN (n = 231) groups on ED, depressive, and anxiety symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and mindfulness, with and without controlling for BMI.

Results

Relative to AN-R, atypAN and AN-BP groups endorsed significantly higher ED and depressive symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and significantly lower mindfulness (all p < 0.001), but atypAN and AN-BP groups did not differ from one another. When controlling for BMI, all previously significant differences between atypAN and AN-R did not remain significant.

Conclusion

Individuals with atypAN who have a higher BMI experience more pronounced ED and emotional symptoms, suggesting that relying solely on BMI as a marker of illness severity may be problematic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重分界点有依据吗?一项针对住院治疗中心患者中非典型厌食症和神经性厌食症亚型的大规模调查。
目的:关于如何区分神经性厌食症(AN)和非典型厌食症(atypAN)这两种诊断实体,以及是否有必要根据体重指数(BMI)进行区分,一直存在争议。更好地了解非典型厌食症和厌食症亚型[限制型厌食症(AN-R)、暴饮暴食型厌食症(AN-BP)]的进食障碍(ED)和情绪症状,无论是否控制体重指数,都能阐明非典型厌食症与厌食症亚型有何不同,以及体重指数分界线是否有依据。方差分析评估了AN-R组(n = 853)、AN-BP组(n = 726)和atypAN组(n = 231)在ED、抑郁和焦虑症状、焦虑敏感性、体验性回避和正念方面的差异,同时考虑或不考虑BMI:结果:相对于AN-R组,非典型性AN组和AN-BP组的ED和抑郁症状、焦虑敏感性、体验性回避均明显高于AN-R组,而正念则明显低于AN-BP组(均为p体重指数(BMI)较高的非典型性焦虑症患者会出现更明显的情欲障碍和情绪症状,这表明仅仅依靠体重指数作为疾病严重程度的标志可能存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Association of Phosphate Supplements With Refeeding Oedema in Restrictive Eating Disorders. The Cognitive Profile in Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa and the Relationship With Autism and ADHD: A Pilot Study. Professional Digital Counselling for Eating Disorders in Germany: Results of the DigiBEssst Project Survey on the Perspectives and Experiences of Health Professionals, Individuals With Eating Disorders, and Carers. Carer Outcomes From a Residential Treatment Service for Eating Disorders. Editorial: Biological Therapies and Eating Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1